Results 1 to 15 of 105

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    All-American Macarthur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    5,196

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew328 View Post
    Schools take home checks from playoff games for the gate...typically football playoff games do generate the schools money and as the rounds progress those checks do increase into mid-five figures....I know after expenses were paid schools will clear a nice chunk of change from the state title games....
    https://sportsday.dallasnews.com/hig...he-dallas-area

    This article is a few years old, but basically there are 3 schools in this sample that actually 'made' money for their school.

    Look at some of the negative numbers on here. It's staggering. If anything, with salaries where they are now, this gap has probably widened. Frankly, this thread actually made me dig more deeply into this and it's actually worse than I thought. Keep in mind, even these schools that actually did 'make money' are giants. You telling me the other 700+ high school teams in Texas are making money?


    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-s...ball-stadiums/

    Ross Kecseg with the Austin-based fiscal watchdog group Empower Texans calls the money being spent on high school stadiums "excessive." The larger problem, he says, is school officials who combine outsize expenditures in one large bond package, leaving voters with no option to approve or reject one project over another. New school construction, building renovations, requests for more buses and other needs may be wrapped into a single request.

    "When they put these propositions on the ballot, they put a whole lot of other things with them," Kecseg said. "By law they're allowed to separate the different requests ... but they lump them all together in an all-or-nothing proposition."

    The above points out one of the major issues.

    – Richardson ISD taxpayers asked for an opportunity to vote for two bonds: One covering necessary expenditures such as facility updates and additional classrooms (with no tax increase); The other for luxury items: $60 million for 4 indoor football practice fields, one at each high school, and $17 million for “library renovation” at every school. The taxpayers’ request for two bonds was rejected, as the district adopted an “all-or-nothing” approach that appears to be the prevailing bond strategy by districts across the state of Texas.
    https://texasscorecard.com/commentar...otball-fields/

    I could post numerous examples of this. We clearly have our priorities out of whack.

    https://www.texastribune.org/2017/06...prepare-worst/

    This issue is never more relevant than in the small towns struggling to meet a budget.


    "We don't have football because of costs. We don't have ag because of costs. We don't have band because of costs," said Superintendent O.K. Wolfenbarger III.

    He plans to keep cutting back on supplies, using less copy paper, finding cheaper deals on utilities and not rehiring support staff.

    "If I start cutting teacher positions ... I've got kids that are going to be in danger of not having the courses they need to graduate," he said.

    How can you read this and think we don't have a real problem?
    Last edited by Macarthur; 01-08-2019 at 11:27 AM.
    Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers.

    -Voltaire

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •