Quote Originally Posted by Dawgs View Post
Easy to say that. Comparing the WOS scores it doesn’t look like that. Say they both improved at the same rate. You guys are reaching if you think PG “a lot” better then Kennedale. There is nothing that points to that.
I disagree with you in part. PG would've beaten Kennedale pretty handily, in my opinion. As for a match up between Carthage and PG, my money would've been on Carthage, but I do think PG would've given them a VERY good game. Both teams were very, very good, no doubt. We could speculate all we want, but that is my opinion. Did you see the size and agility that the Hawks had? They had 300 pounders that very strong, agile, and quick. Unless you lined up against them, you really can't put it in perspective. The X factor would've definitely favored Carthage, though, with Surratt and company.