Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32
  1. #16
    All-American Roughneck93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Columbia
    Posts
    15,706

    Default


  2. #17
    All-American Roughneck93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Columbia
    Posts
    15,706

    Default

    Dak...

  3. #18
    All-American Roughneck93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Columbia
    Posts
    15,706

    Default

    Defense has dominated in the second half....

  4. #19
    All-American Roughneck93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Columbia
    Posts
    15,706

    Default


  5. #20
    All-American Roughneck93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Columbia
    Posts
    15,706

    Default

    Irving...

  6. #21
    All-American Roughneck93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West Columbia
    Posts
    15,706

    Default

    13-2....

  7. #22
    All-American bobcat1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Sanger, Texas
    Posts
    13,220

    Default

    Total domination!

  8. #23
    Starter
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sherman, TX
    Posts
    924

    Default

    I had no idea Dez was a southpaw.

  9. #24
    Moderator Txbroadcaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    16,679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 83Indian View Post
    Is it just me on why we're playing starters in a meaningless game?
    If you held them out this week AND next coupled with the bye that would be 3 weeks. Way too long imo.
    Sideline To Sideline Show Each Week at https://lonestargridiron.com/categor...-to-sideline//

  10. #25
    All-American waterboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gilmer
    Posts
    9,825

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Txbroadcaster View Post
    If you held them out this week AND next coupled with the bye that would be 3 weeks. Way too long imo.
    Agreed. Players have to stay sharp and focused. The only true way to do that is to play like you normally would, getting reps in a game situation. I could understand rotating players in and out, but I would let my starters play at least half the game, maybe more depending on the amount of drop off in effectiveness.
    "Kaizen"

    ".......offense wins games, but DEFENSE wins championships!"

    P.R.I.D.E.

    Gilmer Buckeyes -State Champions:

    2004 3A - Division II
    2009 3A - Division I
    2014 4A - Division II
    2023 4A - Division II

  11. #26
    All-American
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Celina/Kansas City
    Posts
    2,561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Txbroadcaster View Post
    If you held them out this week AND next coupled with the bye that would be 3 weeks. Way too long imo.
    Quote Originally Posted by waterboy View Post
    Agreed. Players have to stay sharp and focused. The only true way to do that is to play like you normally would, getting reps in a game situation. I could understand rotating players in and out, but I would let my starters play at least half the game, maybe more depending on the amount of drop off in effectiveness.


    Yes. And yes.


    Let them play at least a half and stay sharp.
    Texas Forever.

  12. #27
    All-American Macarthur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    5,196

    Default

    Also, they can only dress like 42 or something like that. You just simply can't sit guys in the NFL. Not enough roster spots.
    Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers.

    -Voltaire

  13. #28
    All-American
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Giddings, TX
    Posts
    3,351

    Default

    I am really not trying to stir up anything on this, so don't take it there.

    Are they not getting Romo any reps because they don't want to get him hurt in case they need him? Which is what I have kinda heard come from some interviews. Or, do you guys think he has lost another step from this surgery and they don't want to show that in live full speed action?

    I tend to believe the latter of these scenarios more, cause if he was truly capable of being as good as before, they would want to get him some full speed reps just in case Dak does go down. I don't want to hear any qb controversy scenarios, because that is out the window at this point, and they would have control over that with play calls anyway. He could go in and hand off more than anything and run enough pass plays to check his timing. He wouldn't have to go in and try to break passing records. The cowboys don't have to worry about a qb controversy, so I think they are keeping his trade stock higher by not showing him.
    GO BUFFS!

  14. #29
    All-American Macarthur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    5,196

    Default

    I think they don't want to do anything that might damage any trade value, whether that be rust, diminished skills or injury.
    Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers.

    -Voltaire

  15. #30
    All-American
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Giddings, TX
    Posts
    3,351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macarthur View Post
    I think they don't want to do anything that might damage any trade value, whether that be rust, diminished skills or injury.
    I agree, they are rolling the dice on Dak not going down, and if he does, hoping Romo can step in better than most back ups could, which he probably can.
    GO BUFFS!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •