Massey Ratings 11/25

[WOS87]

Overall Rating

1. Gilmer 1.86
2. Bridgeport 1.84
3. China Spring 1.81 (moved up 1)
4. West Orange-Stark 1.75 (moved up 3)
5. Liberty Hill 1.69 (moved up 1)
6. Prosper 1.68 (moved down 3)
7. Carthage 1.62 (moved down 2)
8. Bellville 1.60 (moved up 1)
9. Navasota 1.59 (moved down 1)
10. Cuero 1.52 (moved up 5)
11. Abilene Wylie 1.51 (moved up 2)
12. Celina 1.50 (moved down 1)
13. Sweetwater 1.45 (moved up 1)
14. Giddings 1.43 (moved up 2)
15. Waco La Vega 1.40 (moved up 6)
16. Burkburnett 1.36 (moved down 4)
17. Tyler Chapel Hill 1.33 (moved down 7)
18. Diboll 1.25
19. Rockdale 1.24 (moved up 3)
20. La Vernia 1.20 (moved down 1)
21. Mexia 1.16 (moved up 4)
22. Monahans 1.14 (moved up 5)
23. Argyle 1.13 (moved down 3)
24. Cleveland 1.10 (moved down 7)
25. Sealy 1.07 (moved down 2)

Top Rated Offenses
1. Brownwood
2. Bridgeport
3. Gilmer
4. Carthage
5. Cuero

Top Rated Defenses
1. West Orange-Stark
2. Prosper
3. Sweetwater
4. Abilene Wylie
5. Bellville


Predictions:

Division I
China Spring 24, Abilene Wylie 15
Prosper 27, Van 10
La Vega 27, Navasota 26
Cuero 45, La Feria 15

Division II
Bridgeport 38, Monahans 23
Liberty Hill 22, Sweetwater 17
Celina 34, Pleasant Grove 20
Kaufman 18, New Boston 16
Gilmer 28, WO-S 24
Carthage 34, Rockdale 22
Bellville 35, Sinton 15
Giddings 41, Rio Hondo 24

[3afan]

Originally posted by WOS87


Predictions:

Division I
China Spring 24, Abilene Wylie 15
Prosper 27, Van 10
La Vega 27, Navasota 26
Cuero 45, La Feria 15

Division II
Bridgeport 38, Monahans 23
Liberty Hill 22, Sweetwater 17
Celina 34, Pleasant Grove 20
Kaufman 18, New Boston 16
Gilmer 28, WO-S 24
Carthage 34, Rockdale 22
Bellville 35, Sinton 15
Giddings 41, Rio Hondo 24


not very many projected close games

[SintonFan_inAustin]

Originally posted by WOS87
Overall Rating

1. Gilmer 1.86
2. Bridgeport 1.84
3. China Spring 1.81 (moved up 1)
4. West Orange-Stark 1.75 (moved up 3)
5. Liberty Hill 1.69 (moved up 1)
6. Prosper 1.68 (moved down 3)
7. Carthage 1.62 (moved down 2)
8. Bellville 1.60 (moved up 1)
9. Navasota 1.59 (moved down 1)
10. Cuero 1.52 (moved up 5)
11. Abilene Wylie 1.51 (moved up 2)
12. Celina 1.50 (moved down 1)
13. Sweetwater 1.45 (moved up 1)
14. Giddings 1.43 (moved up 2)
15. Waco La Vega 1.40 (moved up 6)
16. Burkburnett 1.36 (moved down 4)
17. Tyler Chapel Hill 1.33 (moved down 7)
18. Diboll 1.25
19. Rockdale 1.24 (moved up 3)
20. La Vernia 1.20 (moved down 1)
21. Mexia 1.16 (moved up 4)
22. Monahans 1.14 (moved up 5)
23. Argyle 1.13 (moved down 3)
24. Cleveland 1.10 (moved down 7)
25. Sealy 1.07 (moved down 2)

Top Rated Offenses
1. Brownwood
2. Bridgeport
3. Gilmer
4. Carthage
5. Cuero

Top Rated Defenses
1. West Orange-Stark
2. Prosper
3. Sweetwater
4. Abilene Wylie
5. Bellville


Predictions:

Division I
China Spring 24, Abilene Wylie 15
Prosper 27, Van 10
La Vega 27, Navasota 26
Cuero 45, La Feria 15

Division II
Bridgeport 38, Monahans 23
Liberty Hill 22, Sweetwater 17
Celina 34, Pleasant Grove 20
Kaufman 18, New Boston 16
Gilmer 28, WO-S 24
Carthage 34, Rockdale 22
Bellville 35, Sinton 15
Giddings 41, Rio Hondo 24 we gain 3 points, it was 35-12 yesterday.

[RPF2666]

HMMMM!!!!:thinking:

[WTF-82]

I believe this is the first week this season this poll has picked against the Loboes.

[NateDawg39]

Not even in the playoffs and Browniewood made the list

[martwayne]

u need to re-think your game: navasota 42
la vega 38

navasota wins this game. i'm trying to tell everyone this, and u know this man.

[Keystonepride]

What Specifically are the Massey ratings?

is it just numbers? How do they determine rankings?

[Keystonepride]

Originally posted by martwayne
u need to re-think your game: navasota 42
la vega 38

navasota wins this game. i'm trying to tell everyone this, and u know this man.

I agree....I think Navasota will win!

[STANG RED]

Originally posted by Keystonepride
What Specifically are the Massey ratings?

is it just numbers? How do they determine rankings?

I think strength of schedule is part of the equation, but I dont know what all else besides pure numbers are in it.

[3afan]

Originally posted by NateDawg39
Not even in the playoffs and Browniewood made the list

'cause they scored alot - so what? its just #s

[Panther One]

Everything in his ratings are based off scores, and strength of schedule is indeed factored into his ranking calculation. When we played Ingram and Canyon Lake, our SOS plummeted, and we fell in the ratings. The same thing happened in WOS87's power ratings. These are good to get a guage of the two teams, but they have limitations. Even though the BCS is crap, combining computer rankings with human rankings is the best solution. Sometimes polls need bias and a little reasoning put into them.

In someone's free time (WOS87), they should come up with a system that computes the weighted average of the Massey, Harris, Padilla, Jerry's, and WOS87's ratings and combines them with the various human polls. That would be interesting to see.

[wimbo_pro]

This rating, IMO, becomes very telling this late in the year. Looking at LH's ratings, it tells a story of the '08 Panthers that I think is accurate. Yes, the easy teams near the end of the season dropped them in the ratings, but it is offest by the VERY strong early schedule.

I think I see accuracy in the fact that LH is not in the top 5 in offense, and they are not in the top 5 in defense. HOWEVER, they ARE in the top 5 when taken all together. And isnt this really what the story of LH has been this year? They are winning as a TEAM....not an overly dominating offense of yester-year (though the stats are close), and not the dominating defense of last year and late in '06. But somehow...someway...they rally and get it done. T-E-A-M. I think this rating is very accurate.