PDA

View Full Version : You are ROM



coach
10-25-2008, 04:59 PM
i was looking at some posts when the downlow just started and this is how mathew told people they were ROM. My question is, Why can't we still do that?

Emerson1
10-25-2008, 05:45 PM
Don't wanna hurt peoples feelings

carter08
10-25-2008, 06:04 PM
I remember that.

Necks_Fan
10-25-2008, 06:24 PM
Originally posted by carter08
I remember that. I don't.

pirate4state
10-25-2008, 06:41 PM
Well, we aren't gonna tell you WHY they were ROM'd so what's the point in making an announcement?

and you know yall will want to know WHY!

kepdawg
10-25-2008, 06:57 PM
Originally posted by pirate4state
Well, we aren't gonna tell you WHY they were ROM'd so what's the point in making an announcement?

and you know yall will want to know WHY!

So we know when people are ROM

If there hadn't been a post about you I would have never known you were benched

Sweetwater Red
10-25-2008, 07:02 PM
Originally posted by kepdawg
So we know when people are ROM

If there hadn't been a post about you I would have never known you were benched

She wasn't ROM(ejected). She was benched.:thinking:

kepdawg
10-25-2008, 07:04 PM
Originally posted by Sweetwater Red
She wasn't ROM(ejected). She was benched.:thinking:

And your point is?

Sweetwater Red
10-25-2008, 07:08 PM
Originally posted by kepdawg
And your point is?

Why would they make an announcement about someone being
benched for a few days as opposed to being kicked clear off
the board?:confused:

kepdawg
10-25-2008, 07:12 PM
Originally posted by Sweetwater Red
Why would they make an announcement about someone being
benched for a few days as opposed to being kicked clear off
the board?:confused:

So we know when people are benched

I don't know what part of my posts you are having a problem understanding

I clearly stated my reason for announcing rommees

I clearly stated that p4 was benched

Sweetwater Red
10-25-2008, 07:23 PM
Originally posted by kepdawg


I don't know what part of my posts you are having a problem understanding



:tongue:

kepdawg
10-25-2008, 07:25 PM
Originally posted by Sweetwater Red
:tongue:

:taunt:

sinton66
10-25-2008, 07:48 PM
How about this explanation? Matthew didn't have the standardized warning system we now have, and the new owners have taken a different approach. As far as we're concerned, it's nobody's business but ours and the person disciplined. It says right on the rules page (that all of you agreed to):" Be aware that disciplinary actions are a private matter between the leadership and those who are disciplined. Our policy is not to discuss these matters with anyone."

If one even halfway pays attention, it's not hard at all to tell when someone has been rommed. It ALWAYS says "Ejected" under their name. That's just going to have to suffice.

kepdawg
10-25-2008, 07:55 PM
Originally posted by sinton66
How about this explanation? Matthew didn't have the standardized warning system we now have, and the new owners have taken a different approach. As far as we're concerned, it's nobody's business but ours and the person disciplined. It says right on the rules page (that all of you agreed to):" Be aware that disciplinary actions are a private matter between the leadership and those who are disciplined. Our policy is not to discuss these matters with anyone."

If one even halfway pays attention, it's not hard at all to tell when someone has been rommed. It ALWAYS says "Ejected" under their name. That's just going to have to suffice.

I know I can't have a discussion with you on the subject so I guess that settles it.

sinton66
10-25-2008, 07:59 PM
You could send me a pm. I won't guarantee I'll agree with you, but I'll listen to what you have to say.