More Impressive?

[kepdawg]

102-3-1 from 1987-1993 with 3 championships

90-3 from 2002-2007 with 4 championships

[BILLYFRED0000]

Neither 148-8 with 6 titles 1998-2007.

[kepdawg]

Originally posted by BILLYFRED0000
Neither 148-8 with 6 titles 1998-2007.

I never saw that coming! :rolleyes:

If you don't want to discuss a topic, don't!

[cshscougar08]

SLC's 90-3. Easy.

[espn1]

Everything on this post is impressive and would get you a job anywhere!

[eagles_victory]

Originally posted by BILLYFRED0000
Neither 148-8 with 6 titles 1998-2007. besides doing it at 5a is more impressive then doing almost all of it in 2A and some in 3A

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by kepdawg
I never saw that coming! :rolleyes:

If you don't want to discuss a topic, don't!

Just messin with you Kep.
I pick the one with the titles. You win them all but the titles and you have just won a lot of games. Win the title and you are the champ.

[ronwx5x]

Originally posted by eagles_victory
besides doing it at 5a is more impressive then doing almost all of it in 2A and some in 3A

Celina's move from 2A to 3A seems to have gone pretty well so far!:taunt:

[kepdawg]

This has nothing to do with Celina! :mad:

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by eagles_victory
besides doing it at 5a is more impressive then doing almost all of it in 2A and some in 3A

Wrong bucko. Doing it anywhere is impressive. I think it is harder at the lower levels and the statistics back me up. Celina is the only 3a and under school with more than 5 titles at that level. Bwood also counts to a point but they were the modern day equivalent of 4a since there was a class b. Not 3a. Sealy is next at 5 titles.
So I pick the 4 title stretch because there is one more title. The 3 title stretch is impressive. And BTW both are SLC.

[Rocket]

Originally posted by BILLYFRED0000
Wrong bucko. Doing it anywhere is impressive. I think it is harder at the lower levels and the statistics back me up. Celina is the only 3a and under school with more than 5 titles at that level. Bwood also counts to a point but they were the modern day equivalent of 4a since there was a class b. Not 3a. Sealy is next at 5 titles.
So I pick the 4 title stretch because there is one more title. The 3 title stretch is impressive. And BTW both are SLC.

Harder at the lower levels? How convenient...

You were at the top of 2A. So you had an enrollement advantage. My theory holds true. You had a good coach and good program that stuck with you. He leaves, your done a long time ago. Same thing that happened at Brownwood. We were at the top of 3A playing 500 enrollment and less and we even won ONE when we moved up to 4A. Celina is done. Hope you guys enjoyed it.

The difference is we won all of ours when there was only 1 State Champion and 1 playoff team per District.

[CHS_89]

Originally posted by kepdawg
This has nothing to do with Celina! :mad:

Kep,
I saw this coming the minute you posted this thread. LOL!!!

[charlesrixey]

90-3 with four titles is more impressive

that also includes a loss in a title game

[charlesrixey]

:)

[JR2004]

Originally posted by kepdawg
102-3-1 from 1987-1993 with 3 championships

90-3 from 2002-2007 with 4 championships

SLC's second run is more impressive because it came at the 5A level. No doubt about it.

[Rocket]

Originally posted by JR2004
SLC's second run is more impressive because it came at the 5A level. No doubt about it.

:iagree:
100%

[nobogey72]

Originally posted by Rocket
Harder at the lower levels? How convenient...

You were at the top of 2A. So you had an enrollement advantage. My theory holds true. You had a good coach and good program that stuck with you. He leaves, your done a long time ago. Same thing that happened at Brownwood. We were at the top of 3A playing 500 enrollment and less and we even won ONE when we moved up to 4A. Celina is done. Hope you guys enjoyed it.

The difference is we won all of ours when there was only 1 State Champion and 1 playoff team per District.

You didn't "MOVE UP" to 4A. You may have been called 3A, but it was still the 2nd largest classification. :rolleyes: "Celina is Done"??? That statement may get brought back up again this year.:rolleyes: Dude, you are something else.:nerd: :nerd:

[BILLYFRED0000]

After further review, I take the 2002 -07 because of the Katy game they lost. Almost had 5 and a loooooongg winning streak.
Longer than ours if they had not have lost.

[Rocket]

Originally posted by nobogey72
You didn't "MOVE UP" to 4A. You may have been called 3A, but it was still the 2nd largest classification. :rolleyes: "Celina is Done"??? That statement may get brought back up again this year.:rolleyes: Dude, you are something else.:nerd: :nerd:

:stirpot:

You old fart. Nothing gets by you does it? I hope it does get brought up. I will add much more to that by then.

Worry about your Bullpups.. quit worrying about me.

[Old Tiger]

couldn't LH/Brownwood play Celina in the d2 semi's?

[nobogey72]

Originally posted by Rocket
:stirpot:

You old fart. Nothing gets by you does it? I hope it does get brought up. I will add much more to that by then.

Worry about your Bullpups.. quit worrying about me.

OK. Sorry. Couldn't help it.;)

[Rocket]

Originally posted by Go Blue
couldn't LH/Brownwood play Celina in the d2 semi's?

Yep. Texas Stadium.