View Full Version : Matt Leinart
Old Tiger
04-03-2008, 02:34 PM
What's the big deal about those photos? Idiotic media(no offense to anyone who is in the media on this board).
BreckTxLonghorn
04-03-2008, 02:36 PM
I believe those girls were under 21, so the whole 'contributing to minors' thing got'em riled up.
Sweetwater Red
04-03-2008, 02:36 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3325419
Old Tiger
04-03-2008, 02:39 PM
Originally posted by BreckTxLonghorn
I believe those girls were under 21, so the whole 'contributing to minors' thing got'em riled up. I haven't heard that yet....
Originally posted by Sweetwater Red
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3325419
What is there to be dissappointed about? The guy was at his home. I would guess he's more dissappointed about the pictures getting out instead of the incident.
BuffyMars
04-03-2008, 02:50 PM
who???
oh yeaaaaaah....that guy....i remember him. barely.
he should probably bank while he still can with those ladies.
pirate4state
04-03-2008, 02:51 PM
This is the first I've heard of it. Haven't been watching too much television. Pretty silly & pretty much a non story unless those coeds are minors.
kepdawg
04-03-2008, 02:52 PM
Who cares what he does! I'm not the one paying him!
Old Tiger
04-03-2008, 02:58 PM
Here are the photos
http://msn.foxsports.com/id/7977866_36_1.jpg
http://msn.foxsports.com/id/7977868_36_2.jpg
pirate4state
04-03-2008, 03:00 PM
Originally posted by Go Blue
Here are the photos
http://msn.foxsports.com/id/7977866_36_1.jpg
http://msn.foxsports.com/id/7977868_36_2.jpg
:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Yeah, we really don't need those on here....
Old Tiger
04-03-2008, 03:01 PM
Originally posted by pirate4state
:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Yeah, we really don't need those on here.... Why? No one knows for sure if those girls are under age or not so as of now they are legal. Or did I miss the jest of your post? :(
pirate4state
04-03-2008, 03:05 PM
Originally posted by Go Blue
Why? No one knows for sure if those girls are under age or not so as of now they are legal. Or did I miss the jest of your post? :( because you can see them in the other link already provided...
They do appear to be some high class individuals. . . or maybe they just want his money. But I doubt that ever crossed his mind that evening.
DaHop72
04-03-2008, 03:10 PM
Maybe he ought to spend more time with this little guy.
http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff239/DaHop72/matt.jpg
kepdawg
04-03-2008, 03:14 PM
Originally posted by DaHop72
Maybe he ought to spend more time with this little guy.
http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff239/DaHop72/matt.jpg
:clap:
BuffyMars
04-03-2008, 04:01 PM
Originally posted by DaHop72
Maybe he ought to spend more time with this little guy.
http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff239/DaHop72/matt.jpg
he and tom brady should start a club.
wildstangs
04-03-2008, 05:32 PM
Reminds me of Randall "Pink" Floyd.
LH Panther Mom
04-03-2008, 05:52 PM
Originally posted by Go Blue
I haven't heard that yet....
What is there to be dissappointed about? The guy was at his home. I would guess he's more dissappointed about the pictures getting out instead of the incident.
It's called "morality clause". :rolleyes: :rolleyes: Goodell's show, Goodell's rules! And yes, I know your thoughts on the whole morality clause.
Old Tiger
04-03-2008, 06:47 PM
Originally posted by LH Panther Mom
It's called "morality clause". :rolleyes: :rolleyes: Goodell's show, Goodell's rules! And yes, I know your thoughts on the whole morality clause. His coach said that not Goodell.
LH Panther Mom
04-03-2008, 07:00 PM
Originally posted by Go Blue
His coach said that not Goodell.
Yeah, I read it. Do the coaches not have a responsibility as far as it's concerned? Sounds like the coach has a certain behavior guideline that HE expects, and this didn't meet it.
Old Tiger
04-03-2008, 07:02 PM
Originally posted by LH Panther Mom
Yeah, I read it. Do the coaches not have a responsibility as far as it's concerned? Sounds like the coach has a certain behavior guideline that HE expects, and this didn't meet it. It's the off-season and he's at his own house?
BuffyMars
04-03-2008, 07:12 PM
yeah, i don't see what the big deal is....other than the fact he's a big douchebag.
BreckTxLonghorn
04-03-2008, 07:25 PM
Again, he contributed to minors. That's illegal.
Goodell and Whisenhunt have a huge right to interfere in all of this.
lostaussie
04-03-2008, 07:33 PM
Originally posted by BreckTxLonghorn
Again, he contributed to minors. That's illegal.
Goodell and Whisenhunt have a huge right to interfere in all of this. Dude..........it's GO BLUE.............would you have expected anything more. It's like arguing with your computer screen.
LH Panther Mom
04-03-2008, 07:34 PM
Originally posted by Go Blue
It's the off-season and he's at his own house?
The girls are underage. :doh: :doh: So what if it's the off-season? Laws don't only apply to "while you're at work", they're year round. :p
LH Panther Mom
04-03-2008, 07:34 PM
Originally posted by BreckTxLonghorn
Again, he contributed to minors. That's illegal.
Goodell and Whisenhunt have a huge right to interfere in all of this.
:clap: :kiss: :clap: :kiss:
PHS Wildcats
04-03-2008, 07:37 PM
:clap:
Old Tiger
04-03-2008, 09:30 PM
Originally posted by LH Panther Mom
The girls are underage. :doh: :doh: So what if it's the off-season? Laws don't only apply to "while you're at work", they're year round. :p Did he get a citation for contributing to minors? ;) Also, how do we know for sure these girls are underaged, because some gossip site said so?
ASUFrisbeeStud
04-03-2008, 09:51 PM
If I was pro football player and had millions and was considered sexy, I'd definitly have a bunch of young ladies at my house. Then again I'm a childish sexist pig so I probably shouldn't put my thoughts in.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.