PDA

View Full Version : crazy woman lawsuit of the day



jason
12-06-2007, 10:05 AM
good grief...

LINK\ (http://www.newsobserver.com/news/wake/story/814331.html)



Sarah Ovaska, Staff Writer
RALEIGH - Kristin Wallace bought some very wet land as an investment. Eight acres of it, all underneath Lake Lynn.

The Cary woman bought the land for $12,500 last year at a public auction of property with delinquent taxes. Now she is suing to try to force the city of Raleigh or Wake County to buy the soggy land from her or drain it.

"It's extremely valuable to me," Wallace said, "dry."

City and county officials say Wallace, who started investing in real estate less than two years ago, knew the land was lake bottom when she bought it, something she doesn't dispute.

"It's bought as is," said Shelley Eason with the County Attorney's Office.

Lake Lynn was built in the 1970s to control flooding and has since been enveloped by the city. Easements from private property owners allowed the county to create the lake. It's now surrounded by apartment complexes and dog walkers, cyclists and joggers on the greenway.

Wallace's Cary-based company, Sugartree Investment Group, sued the city and county in late August seeking to remove both the water and a wooden footbridge that is part of the city's greenway system ringing the lake. The lawsuit was filed after her lawyer, H. Cliff Kirkhart of Cary, sent several letters to the city and county offering to sell the land for an unspecified amount.

Kirkhart wrote that he considers the city to be "trespassing" on the land by allowing joggers and cyclists to use the footbridge. The county, which maintains the lake itself as part of a flood-control project, is acting "malicious" by keeping the land flooded, he wrote in a complaint filed at the courthouse.

City and county officials want the lawsuit dismissed. In Wallace's case, a purchase "as is" means flooded, Eason said. Easements that allowed the county to flood the land carry over to the next owner, who can't demand that the lake be drained, she said. Francis Raspberry, the deputy city attorney handling the case, says the city's easement allowing recreation on the property also transfers to the new owner.

The 8 acres weren't always submerged. They were farmland, which was converted into a lake in 1976 as part of the Crabtree Creek Flood Control Project, a county-run initiative that created several dams and lakes to hold floodwaters. Other flood-control lakes include Shelley Lake and Lake Crabtree.

In 1983, the 8 acres were bought by now-defunct Lake Lynn Development, which owned surrounding dry land that would become homes and apartments.

Lake Lynn Development eventually went out of business. In 2006 the county revenue department noticed that yearly property tax bills of $9 to $35 a year had gone unpaid for more than a decade on the two parcels, one of 6.68 acres in the middle of the lake and a 1.32-acre inlet, Eason said.

More as a housekeeping effort than anything else, the county decided to get rid of the property and put it up for auction in September 2006 as required by law to try to recoup unpaid taxes. Expecting no bids, government officials thought the land would be transferred to the city, which would pay off the back taxes.

Neither the city nor the county envisioned someone's bidding for the water-logged land, Eason said.

Wallace entered the fray in the midst of the auction and made an upset bid of $6,250 on each parcel. She won, and the sheriff's deeds for both parcels were transferred to Sugartree Investment Group.

Real estate is a new venture for Wallace, and the lake purchase was one of her first investments, she said.

She's learning as she goes.

"I don't think there's ever been a case like this before," Wallace said.

All involved agree.

(Staff writers Jack Hagel and Dudley Price and news researcher Becky Ogburn contributed to this report.)

sarah.ovaska@newsobserver.com or 829-4622
Staff writers Jack Hagel and Dudley Price and news researcher Becky Ogburn contributed to this report.

District303aPastPlayer
12-06-2007, 10:19 AM
so she owns the land and the city has built a lake on top of it... and now she wants her land to be able to build on it, but she wants it dry....? am i reading this right?

3afan
12-06-2007, 10:22 AM
there was a lake before she bought it ... the lake was built in the 70s

Ranger Mom
12-06-2007, 10:24 AM
She bought a lake!!

What a ditz!!

Even if she DID drain it, what would you do with a low-lying piece of land that is surrounded by apartment complexes??

Build a house on it and be surrounded by people that hate you??

rangerjim
12-06-2007, 10:26 AM
She better buy a boat house for this cuz she's doesn't have a leg to stand on. Easements for the trail transfer from owner to owner.

She better go buy some hot McDonald's coffee and spill it on herself to recoup the $12,500 she spent for her part of the lake.

Stownhorse
12-06-2007, 10:26 AM
The county should have taken care of that crap a long time ago.

jason
12-06-2007, 11:23 AM
Originally posted by Ranger Mom
She bought a lake!!

What a ditz!!

Even if she DID drain it, what would you do with a low-lying piece of land that is surrounded by apartment complexes??

Build a house on it and be surrounded by people that hate you?? she didnt buy the lake, she bought the land UNDER the lake...


and this isnt directed at you, but just a clarification for all...

she claims, since the city is the one using the land as flood control, it is their responsibility to get their water off her property or purchase the land back from her...

no doubt, the lawsuit should be thrown out, and she should be given a 'stupid' fine...

STANG RED
12-06-2007, 01:08 PM
They are both at fault. She is stupid for buying it, and the city was stupid for selling it to her. Just give her back what she paid for it, and she better be happy just to get it back. Tell the lawyers to go crawl back in the hole they crawled out of and quit trying to make an easy buck. I'm sure Raleigh has an ambulance or two they could be out chasing anyway.