WOS -vs- Giddings Updates [Archive]

Darren

11-23-2007, 09:00 PM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
LOL....no shot at you Darren..but GEEZUS...you are bout the 7th person tonight to ask something about a game being broadcast.....THIS IS WHY I CREATE THE "PLAYOFF BROADCAST" THREADS!!! go about half way down the 1st page and there is a thread I made up this week w/ most of the games, when they are being broadcast...and links to the broadcast. COME ON PEOPLE...STOP BEING LAZY! ;)

I tried to go onto the website you listed but I still don't see where it is being broadcast online.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:01 PM

Giddings busts one....Locke runs for 49yds....run down from behind. They're saying the guy who caught him is a track standout at WOS. Must be, LOL.

Giddings fumbles....and recovers the fumble...

2nd and 12

tied at 6

fumble again and WOS recovers!

tigerpride_08

11-23-2007, 09:02 PM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
Giddings busts one....Locke runs for 49yds....run down from behind. They're saying the guy who caught him is a track standout at WOS. Must be, LOL.

Giddings fumbles....and recovers the fumble...

2nd and 12

tied at 6

fumble again and WOS recovers!

maybe this where Brock would have maybe made a difference...maybe he would have broke it all the way:confused:...WOS needs to take advantage of getting the ball back...

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:02 PM

Originally posted by Darren
I tried to go onto the website you listed but I still don't see where it is being broadcast online. in the left margin...there is a little white box blinking that says " click here to listen to HS sports".....ya know what....here:

http://www.kogt.com/kogtlive.asx

Darren

11-23-2007, 09:03 PM

Originally posted by Darren
I tried to go onto the website you listed but I still don't see where it is being broadcast online.

Ok I finally figured it out.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:05 PM

Originally posted by Darren
Ok I finally figured it out. LOL...sounds like a wild one so far...glad you are able to tune in.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:06 PM

begining of the 2nd Q tied 6-6

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:09 PM

2nd and 9 at Giddings 39 for WOS.....

incomplete pass....flag.....

pass interference on Giddings.

14yd penalty and 1st down.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:10 PM

just heard a score....Jasper 13 Navasota 7

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:11 PM

1st down WOS to the Giddings 12 on a QB keeper...

They're running right at Giddings now for about the last 3 or 4 plays and Giddings cannot stop them.

T.O. Giddings 8:49 to play in the half.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:12 PM

WOS down to the 5yd line...2nd and goal.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:13 PM

TD WOS.

WOS goes for 2 and gets it.

WOS 14
Giddings 6

tigerpride_08

11-23-2007, 09:15 PM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
TD WOS.

WOS goes for 2 and gets it.

WOS 14
Giddings 6

i'm really surprised WOS is running it like they are....Giddings better respond this drive...

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:16 PM

Originally posted by tigerpride_08
i'm really surprised WOS is running it like they are....Giddings better respond this drive... they better do something...WOS has EXPLODED in the 2nd half almost every game this season. If Giddings doesn't stop them...this one could get UGLY after half time.

bulldogbark

11-23-2007, 09:18 PM

Originally posted by tigerpride_08
i'm really surprised WOS is running it like they are....Giddings better respond this drive...

Not suprising at all WO-S has always been able to run the ball. no one seemed to pay attention to it :)

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:19 PM

Giddings has 3rd down...QB keeps it and is stacked up.....flag....false start on Giddings

5yd penalty replay 3rd down....

4th down QB gets hit hard...

tigerpride_08

11-23-2007, 09:20 PM

Originally posted by bulldogbark
Not suprising at all WO-S has always been able to run the ball. no one seemed to pay attention to it :)

well i knew "DPG" returned from last year so i expected them to be able to run...but they're breaking off 4-5 yards everytime...i guess i thought to much of the Buff's D....:thinking:

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:21 PM

punt.....

WOS takes it at the 11....gets out to the 51......flag.....

looks like its coming back. block in the back against WOS. Flag at the 19.....backed up to their own 9yd line.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:21 PM

Originally posted by tigerpride_08
well i knew "DPG" returned from last year so i expected them to be able to run...but they're breaking off 4-5 yards everytime...i guess i thought to much of the Buff's D....:thinking: in my opinion most EVERYONE thought a little too much of Giddings. I think this game will be what exposes that if it continues to go the way its going.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:27 PM

WOS punts.....3 flags on the return...Dock had the return.....

illegal block in the back.....

ball at the 46 1st and 10

gain of 2 to the 44 2nd and 8

Jasper up over Navasota 27 to 14...

Giddings gets about 2....3rd and 6

QB keeper....hit about 6 times trying to run it.....

4th and 8 T.O WOS

tigerpride_08

11-23-2007, 09:27 PM

Buff's QB hit not once, not twice, but 6 TIMES! :D is that possible? haha

WOS87

11-23-2007, 09:27 PM

If we can play keep away for 3 more minutes.... Giddings will be going in to the half trailing for the first time this season....

and WO-S will be going in to the half with their 3rd biggest lead in 12 games.

Giddings Halftime Scores This Season

Giddings 30
Wimberley 14

Giddings 22
Kashmere 0

Giddings 35
Hutto 23

Giddings 10
Midway 0

Giddings 14
La Grange 7

Giddings 14
Navasota 7

Giddings 7
Caldwell 7

Giddings 13
Bellville 0

Giddings 35
Smithville 7

Giddings 7
Sealy 0

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 09:33 PM

3rd and 1 WOS.....don't think they got it...Giddings calls T.O.

WOS87

11-23-2007, 09:35 PM

Giddings fumbles the punt return...

WOS ball

mistanice

11-23-2007, 09:36 PM

score?

WOS87

11-23-2007, 09:37 PM

If we can just have a 2nd half that's half as good as any of the previous 11, I think we're in good shape! No team has scored more than 7 points against WO-S in a 2nd half this year.

WOS 14
Giddings 6
HALFTIME

WOS gets to receive to start the 3rd

tigerpride_08

11-23-2007, 09:37 PM

very sloppy play be Giddings so far...WOS no doubt has the advantage now...

WOS87

11-23-2007, 09:38 PM

The winner of this games plays the winner of La Vega and Crockett.... and that one is a LOT closer than most people probably thought it would be....

La Vega 20
Crockett 13
3rd Q

mistanice

11-23-2007, 09:41 PM

Originally posted by WOS87
The winner of this games plays the winner of La Vega and Crockett.... and that one is a LOT closer than most people probably thought it would be....

La Vega 20
Crockett 13
3rd Q

where are you getting this score?

WOS87

11-23-2007, 09:45 PM

Originally posted by mistanice
where are you getting this score?

---> HERE (http://www.fridaynightmadness.com/scoreboard.asp?id=1&c=5&w=11/22/2007)

WOS87

11-23-2007, 09:49 PM

SE Texas is doing better than a lot of people expected so far tonight.... we've just got to keep it up!

Lumberton 14
La Marque 14
HALF

Dayton 28
Texas City 3
HALF

WOS87

11-23-2007, 09:52 PM

Royse City losing to Roosevelt 9-34 at the half?

Wow!

mistanice

11-23-2007, 09:52 PM

Livingston won today. 42 - 7 over Houston Washington.

WOS87

11-23-2007, 10:08 PM

Jasper up over Navasota 34-14 in the 3rd

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:09 PM

and our 2nd half is underway. GO WOS!!!

WOS87

11-23-2007, 10:13 PM

WOS 20
Giddings 6

Woo hoo!!

and the PAT is....

Good!

WOS 21
Giddings 6

RdaleBoi08

11-23-2007, 10:13 PM

TD WOS

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:14 PM

WOOOHOO!!!

LHPfactory

11-23-2007, 10:18 PM

Who did WOS loose to this season, and what was the score?

WOS87

11-23-2007, 10:19 PM

4A Bay City.... we were leading 12-8 until the final 30 seconds of the game, when Bay City scored and won 15-12.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:20 PM

Originally posted by LHPfactory
Who did WOS loose to this season, and what was the score? I believe it was Bay City...a pretty decent 4A that also beat up on Cuero this year. Not sure what the score was, but I think it was fairly close if I recall correctly.

LHPfactory

11-23-2007, 10:21 PM

Yeah, I used to play Bay City back in the day, Lottta speed. They barely beat Cuero also, ............:thinking: Sounds Like a Cuero-WOS in the semis will be a great game.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:23 PM

Originally posted by LHPfactory
Yeah, I used to play Bay City back in the day, Lottta speed. They barely beat Cuero also, ............:thinking: Sounds Like a Cuero-WOS in the semis will be a great game. I listened to the Cuero/Bay City game....Bay City totally dominated much more than the score would have you think.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:24 PM

FUMBLE!!! Giddings recovers their fumble. 4th and short....they're goin for it.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:24 PM

1st down Giddings to the 31.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:25 PM

Giddings 1st and goal from the 6

RdaleBoi08

11-23-2007, 10:26 PM

Commentators Said Nexts Week Game Has Been Set For Friday @ Conroe!

RdaleBoi08

11-23-2007, 10:27 PM

Fumble On The 1, 3rd Down & Goal!

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:27 PM

2nd and goal....they say hes in.....he fumbles....falls on the ball....3rd and goal from the 1....

RdaleBoi08

11-23-2007, 10:27 PM

TD Giddings on QB Sneak

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:28 PM

TD Giddings...

21 to 12....Giddings goin for the EP or fake?

PAT NO GOOD!!!!

RdaleBoi08

11-23-2007, 10:28 PM

Field Goal No Good, Hit The Up Right

RdaleBoi08

11-23-2007, 10:30 PM

14 Play Drive, But Now A 2 Score Game!...

RdaleBoi08

11-23-2007, 10:34 PM

WOS 3 n out..Giddings Ball

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:34 PM

WOS fumbles? Giddings ball and Jenke takes it back down to the 15? I stepped away. What happened?

RdaleBoi08

11-23-2007, 10:34 PM

BIG Run By The FB To 12 Yard Line, Poor Tacklin By WOS

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:35 PM

Originally posted by RdaleBoi08
WOS 3 n out..Giddings Ball ah, okay.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:36 PM

TD Giddings 21 to 18....

PAT good

21 to 19 WOS 10 seconds left in 3rd.

WOS87

11-23-2007, 10:38 PM

There went Giddings' momentum!

WOS returns it for a 95 yard kickoff return!!

WOS 28
Giddings 19
4th Q

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:38 PM

95yd kickoff return for a TD WOS!!!

tigerfan69

11-23-2007, 10:38 PM

touchdown wos

R4Editor

11-23-2007, 10:48 PM

my uncle is at that game and he says both of these teams are fast.

tigerfan69

11-23-2007, 10:51 PM

It sounds like a good game.Alot of speed on both sides.

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 10:52 PM

Originally posted by tigerfan69
It sounds like a good game.Alot of speed on both sides. yup...been back and forth...turnovers, the makings of a good game. Glad I tuned in.

cr180t

11-23-2007, 10:58 PM

Whats the score?

X Man

11-23-2007, 10:58 PM

WOS is faced with a punt. 4th and 14. It looks like both teams have strong defense. WOS punter was hit, but no flag. There is a flag against Giddings. Late hit on return. Puts them on their 32.

X Man

11-23-2007, 10:59 PM

Score still WOS 28 Giddings 19

X Man

11-23-2007, 11:00 PM

Giddings gets 1st down on QB sneak

X Man

11-23-2007, 11:01 PM

2nd down and 4yd. did not make it. 3rd down and 1 yard.

X Man

11-23-2007, 11:02 PM

They made the first down. Sounds like Giddings is fired up to make a TD. Tough squad.

X Man

11-23-2007, 11:03 PM

Flag on pass. Radio says offensive pass interference, but zebra says defensive pass interference. Puts Giddings on the 8.

X Man

11-23-2007, 11:04 PM

Giddings fumbled and WOS recovers! WOS takes it on the 20! they will run the clock out.

RdaleBoi08

11-23-2007, 11:04 PM

QB Moves The Ball Down To The 1...& Fumbled It...WOS Has The Ball!

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 11:04 PM

FUMBLE!!!! WOS ball!!

WOS87

11-23-2007, 11:04 PM

woo hoo!!!

tigerfan69

11-23-2007, 11:05 PM

fumble wos recovers in the end zone will bring out to the 20.GO WOS.

X Man

11-23-2007, 11:05 PM

1 min 39 secs left. Giddings time out. 2nd down WOS.

X Man

11-23-2007, 11:07 PM

1 min 31 sec. Another time out.

tigerfan69

11-23-2007, 11:07 PM

Giddings time out last one.

X Man

11-23-2007, 11:07 PM

First down WOS! It's over!!!!!!

WOS87

11-23-2007, 11:08 PM

See you next year Giddings!

Pretty much our whole team will be coming back as most of them are Sophomores

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 11:09 PM

HEELLLLLL YEAH!!!! WAY TO GO WOS!!! Congrats and good luck next week against Waco La Vega!! :clap:

tigerfan69

11-23-2007, 11:10 PM

Final

WOS 28
Giddings 19

that was a very good game by both teams.

X Man

11-23-2007, 11:10 PM

Well, WOS goes to Conroe against LaVega! Giddings didn't have the Fitzhenry boy, but WOS didn't have One of the Garrett boys either. It's an even team game. No one can make excuses, and I'm glad. This was two super teams that met head on and played hard nose football.

CHS_Grad '85

11-23-2007, 11:12 PM

Man - what a heart breaker for Giddings... Congrats to WOS... :clap:

WOS87

11-23-2007, 11:18 PM

It's going to be in Huntsville.... not Conroe.

SintonFan_inAustin

11-23-2007, 11:42 PM

WOS going 5a in 2 yrs?

sweetwater07

11-23-2007, 11:53 PM

wow that score was surprising

IHStangFan

11-23-2007, 11:54 PM

Originally posted by sweetwater07
wow that score was surprising not to some of us :)

WOS87

11-24-2007, 12:00 AM

Originally posted by SintonFan_inAustin
WOS going 5a in 2 yrs?

If anything we'll be closer to 2A... we turned in an enrollment in the 600's this year... just 8 years ago for the 2000 realignment we turned in a number right above 1000.

sweetwater07

11-24-2007, 12:16 AM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
not to some of us :)

haha

DU_stud04

11-24-2007, 12:53 AM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
not to some of us :) i was wrong about the score :( wos didnt win by 4tds :(

IHStangFan

11-24-2007, 12:55 AM

Originally posted by DU_stud04
i was wrong about the score :( wos didnt win by 4tds :( LOL...no...they didn't. I'm waiting patiently for the "well Fitzhenry didn't play or we'd of won" crowd.

DU_stud04

11-24-2007, 12:59 AM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
LOL...no...they didn't. I'm waiting patiently for the "well Fitzhenry didn't play or we'd of won" crowd. didnt know he didnt play afterall

IHStangFan

11-24-2007, 12:59 AM

Originally posted by DU_stud04
didnt know he didnt play afterall yeah...but neither did one of the Garrett boys for WOS....so its a non-issue.

DU_stud04

11-24-2007, 01:03 AM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
yeah...but neither did one of the Garrett boys for WOS....so its a non-issue. if i had known he wasnt playing i woulda said wos by 35+ hahaha

good thing i didnt know hahaha

IHStangFan

11-24-2007, 01:05 AM

Originally posted by DU_stud04
if i had known he wasnt playing i woulda said wos by 35+ hahaha

good thing i didnt know hahaha LOL.....actually..their backup Locke had a darn good game.

eagles_victory

11-24-2007, 01:21 AM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
LOL...no...they didn't. I'm waiting patiently for the "well Fitzhenry didn't play or we'd of won" crowd. Well if you take someones best player off there team it is a pretty big loss

IHStangFan

11-24-2007, 01:24 AM

Originally posted by eagles_victory
Well if you take someones best player off there team it is a pretty big loss you evidently didn't read any further than this....WOS was missing one of the Garrett boys as well....so... :)

eagles_victory

11-24-2007, 01:28 AM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
you evidently didn't read any further than this....WOS was missing one of the Garrett boys as well....so... :) ok but you take one of the best players in the state off of a team and you act like it makes no difference. I could care less who won this game but you act like Brock not playing is no big deal.

IHStangFan

11-24-2007, 01:30 AM

Originally posted by eagles_victory
ok but you take one of the best players in the state off of a team and you act like it makes no difference. I could care less who won this game but you act like Brock not playing is no big deal. Locke had a GREAT game...and as stated WOS was missing one of their best players as well. I really don't think it'd of made much diff. Congrats to Giddings on a good season and I hope Fitzhenry does well at UT..I'll be watching. Great game WOS, and good luck next week against WLV.

setxsports

11-24-2007, 01:34 AM

The best RB for WO-S didn't play...Congrats WOS

eagles_victory

11-24-2007, 01:36 AM

I want to see what Chris Parr can do against this stout WOS team. It will be a dog fight next Friday night I still think LV is flying under the radar a little bit

IHStangFan

11-24-2007, 01:37 AM

Originally posted by eagles_victory
I want to see what Chris Parr can do against this stout WOS team. It will be a dog fight next Friday night I still think LV is flying under the radar a little bit yeah...I think this game is gonna be a battle! I picked WOS early in the year to win a title...but I'm worried about this next game.

eagles_victory

11-24-2007, 01:38 AM

Lavega is beatable dont get me wrong but you can talk Whaley Pratt or any other 3a running back and Chris Parr may be just as good or better. Kortney Parr aint bad either

IHStangFan

11-24-2007, 01:40 AM

Originally posted by eagles_victory
Lavega is beatable dont get me wrong but you can talk Whaley Pratt or any other 3a running back and Chris Parr may be just as good or better. Kortney Parr aint bad either there is definitely a great class of RBs shaping up in 3A ball. The Pratt kid is evidently the real deal, the Waley kid is supposed to be amazing as well. There's the Calhoun kid out in Van, the Clay kid in Snyder, etc. etc.

Bull's-eye

11-24-2007, 01:43 AM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
LOL...no...they didn't. I'm waiting patiently for the "well Fitzhenry didn't play or we'd of won" crowd.

Losing Fitzhenry definately hurt their chances of winning the game. If you ever watched Giddings, you know they are a much better team with him on the field.

eagles_victory

11-24-2007, 01:43 AM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
there is definitely a great class of RBs shaping up in 3A ball. The Pratt kid is evidently the real deal, the Waley kid is supposed to be amazing as well. There's the Calhoun kid out in Van, the Clay kid in Snyder, etc. etc. I was much more impressed with Chris Parr (soph) when i saw him this year then I was with Whaley the two times i saw him

Crimestick

11-24-2007, 02:15 AM

As I said last year, it was a shame to see two teams of this quality have to play in just the second round. There's no doubt in my mind that we'd have met two rounds from now if we hadn't played tonight (no disrespect to LaVega - I'm assuming that they also would be a later-round game). Congrats to Giddings on a great season and a hard-fought, memorable game. You had a lot of speed and talent on the field out there tonight. Dock really is a beast, and I was impressed that a kid his size is punting, returning punts, etc.

Originally posted by eagles_victory
I want to see what Chris Parr can do against this stout WOS team. It will be a dog fight next Friday night I still think LV is flying under the radar a little bit

I hate to break this, but there's no such thing as a sixth-ranked 11-0 team "flying under the radar." We were laying low until this week, but I have to guess that tonight will change that.

Yes, Fitz was out for Giddings, but WO-S was missing arguably their best player on offense as well. To be honest, I've seen Fitzhenry twice, and Locke played as well as he did in either of those games - and better passing.

I thought the game was not officiated well, but not poorly enough to affect the outcome. While my eyes obviously are blind to Giddings getting robbed (which I'm sure happened), they did see our punter get laid out with no flag, our CB get tackled by a WR and have a flag for defensive PI, and a WO-S receiver who was grabbed around the waist and hit his shoulder on the ground as he stretched for a first, which jolted the ball loose. It was called a fumble, even though his entire body hit before the arm holding the ball. Again - I don't think it affected the outcome, but wasn't it an oddly-called game for a playoff crew?

I hope all is healing well with Fitzhenry as he prepares for his stint at Texas, where he'll probably be playing CB alongside two WO-S grads - Beasley and Earl Thomas. That will be one hell of an athletic defensive backfield!

Go MUSTANGS!

crazy

11-24-2007, 02:59 AM

I agree with you Crime...it was a poorly officiated game. It very well could have made a difference in the game. They tried to do everything they could to give it to Giddings. The PI was crap! Their receiver was behind our defender and their receiver pulled our guy down (both were facing the ball) and WE got the PI! BULLBUTTER! The fumble was crap, too, just like you said. He was clearly down and the whistle had blown, yet they called it a fumble and gave it to Giddings. There were several illegal blocks they didn't call against Giddings. I hate having to play Refs, too. I'm so proud of our Mustangs.

griff

11-24-2007, 03:05 AM

Yeah, the refs had their share of blown calls and missed calls. However, I was happy that they caught the Giddings cheapshots (late hits). The Buffs have become known for this kind of thing. At least they escaped without any ejections this time.

X Man

11-24-2007, 03:54 AM

Originally posted by eagles_victory
ok but you take one of the best players in the state off of a team and you act like it makes no difference. I could care less who won this game but you act like Brock not playing is no big deal.

Exactly the point. WOS had one of the best players in the state not playing either. So things balance out. It's not an issue.

FormerBellvilleBrahma

11-24-2007, 10:16 AM

Originally posted by X Man
Exactly the point. WOS had one of the best players in the state not playing either. So things balance out. It's not an issue.

Not having Fitzhenry Giddings #1 QB had to make some differance, the player out for WOS, was he their #1 QB?

FormerBellvilleBrahma

11-24-2007, 10:21 AM

Originally posted by Bull's-eye
Losing Fitzhenry definately hurt their chances of winning the game. If you ever watched Giddings, you know they are a much better team with him on the field.

Not having a 3 year starter out there for that game did hurt Giddings chances on the game, he ran the offense, most of the time he was the offense.

setxsports

11-24-2007, 11:34 AM

Originally posted by FormerBellvilleBrahma
Not having Fitzhenry Giddings #1 QB had to make some differance, the player out for WOS, was he their #1 QB? RB

crazy

11-24-2007, 11:39 AM

Originally posted by FormerBellvilleBrahma
Not having a 3 year starter out there for that game did hurt Giddings chances on the game, he ran the offense, most of the time he was the offense.

Everybody can go back now and say coulda, shoulda, woulda all they want. Bottom line is....they DIDN'T.

WOS 28
GHS 19

It's history.

WOS1

11-24-2007, 11:43 AM

Locke made some very, very crucial plays in the second half which included some huge completions on 3rd down. I don't think Brock would have done any better or worse. As for the mental factor, I can see where that could be a problem. Most people don't know this but Quinny Garrett, the back who was out last night, was the starting tailback for Cisco last year before he moved back home. Cisco went to the 2A state title game. He is not just a good, but a great back. Losing him hurt WOS, but WOS is a TEAM. When you play as a team, you can overcome the loss of one person.

wimbo_pro

11-24-2007, 11:46 AM

Originally posted by griff
However, I was happy that they caught the Giddings cheapshots (late hits). The Buffs have become known for this kind of thing.

So true, Griff. I was pleased to see WOS beat them for this very reason.

LH Panther Mom

11-24-2007, 01:10 PM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
not to some of us :)
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: Correct...

buff4life

11-24-2007, 04:01 PM

buff4ever

11-24-2007, 04:41 PM

Well I can't say anyone on this thread thus far has surprised me any.

Congratulations to WOS, you guys have a great ball club, good luck the rest of the way.

To the sore winners out there who I can't believe are talking about the officials, are you insane? I wasn't going to bring it up, even though we lost, but there were some questionable calls that hurt us or could have helped us if they had been made or made the other way. But I will agree, they didn't change the outcome of the game either way. I just can't believe that WOS posters brought up the officiating after that win.

The difference in the game was the 95 yard kick off return. That made the 28 to 19 spread that proved to be too much for the buffs to come back from. The two score separation put us in a bind. Changed the play calling options when we later made it to the WOS 3 yard line. Heck even a field goal at that point would have POTENTIALLY won it had it still been 21 to 19, I UNDERSTAND THIS WASN'T THE CASE THOUGH.

Now to address the giddings haters out there who think we are the dirtiest team in america. The boys made the town proud last night. They faught hard till the end with class. There was ONE late hit, that's right ONE; and I truly believe the lineman thought the play was still going. I think WOS played with a lot of class as well even though they had more personal fouls than us.

NOTE: I was right about this game in some ways, wrong in one. I thought that it would be a defensive war, which both defenses are VERY good, but there were more points scored than I thought. I did say that if either team scored 28 they would win. I would have bet you that if giddings scored 3 tds that they would have won. I would have lost that bet.

LOCKE played one hell of a game for getting thrown in there against a very fast wos defense. Like i have stated, i would have thought his 3 tds would have won this game. WOS offense was better than I thought, of course they did very well at running right at us, OUR WEAKNESS this year and last.

Some of you may agree or disagree with me, I just can't say I expected to get on here and read some of the crap i did. We are proud of our buffs, this year this week the breaks went the other way.

Once again good luck to WOS.

3aSoftball4Mom

11-24-2007, 05:09 PM

Congatulations to Giddings on your great season, I hope that you are standing PROUD. :clap:

I was at the game and pretty much watching closeup through binoculars. The Buffs #7, did a fantastic job on both offense and defense. And I will say that he is one of the classiest players I've ever seen in HS FB. What I saw from him, was genuinely good sportsmanship...
ie:
patting the other team on the back....helping WOS players up, when he happened to tackle them......the first one to take a knee when a WOS player was hurt AND then turn around to tell his teammates to do the same. Not to mention, he has an extreme amount of talent, both offensively and defensively.

What I saw from "some" not all, other players were cheap shots, hitting opponents from the back after the play was over, etc.... Now I don't know if there was any trash talking, to provoke those shots, it's hard to see their mouths moving when they have their helmets on.
But realistically that's HS FB. Unfortunately:(

Both teams fought hard last night, both are very talented and well coached, but the better team won this year.

What I hate to hear, especially for the players sake is, that "if #5 was playing, Giddings would have won." What's that saying to the rest of the team? They are not worthy of a win without him? WOW :eek: Then by those standards, they aren't really needed out there.
It's been said that they are at their best when 5 is out there, I'm sure they are, but I'm also sure the coaches prepare for that scenario.

Yes, #5 is the top QB in the state and there are really not enough words/space to describe his talent in this post, but #7 is very talented too, as is the rest of the team, let's not overlook them. They were playing a talented team, with lots of speed and a great offense/deffense. WOS was missing one of the top, if not THE top RB in the state and they overcame.
They deserve credit for a great game played.
And on the other hand, Giddings deserves credit, for a well played game last night too.

Congratulations Stangs!! The best of luck next week .
:clap: :clap: :clap:

.......by the way, the refs weren't "that" bad. :D but if you think about it, every game and every sport has bad calls and usually not so great refs/umps. So I guess we should be used to it.

I know, I know, you don't have to say it......"STICK TO SOFTBALL"
lol

buff4ever

11-24-2007, 11:44 PM

Originally posted by 3aSoftball4Mom
Congatulations to Giddings on your great season, I hope that you are standing PROUD. :clap:

I was at the game and pretty much watching closeup through binoculars. The Buffs #7, did a fantastic job on both offense and defense. And I will say that he is one of the classiest players I've ever seen in HS FB. What I saw from him, was genuinely good sportsmanship...
ie:
patting the other team on the back....helping WOS players up, when he happened to tackle them......the first one to take a knee when a WOS player was hurt AND then turn around to tell his teammates to do the same. Not to mention, he has an extreme amount of talent, both offensively and defensively.

What I saw from "some" not all, other players were cheap shots, hitting opponents from the back after the play was over, etc.... Now I don't know if there was any trash talking, to provoke those shots, it's hard to see their mouths moving when they have their helmets on.
But realistically that's HS FB. Unfortunately:(

Both teams fought hard last night, both are very talented and well coached, but the better team won this year.

What I hate to hear, especially for the players sake is, that "if #5 was playing, Giddings would have won." What's that saying to the rest of the team? They are not worthy of a win without him? WOW :eek: Then by those standards, they aren't really needed out there.
It's been said that they are at their best when 5 is out there, I'm sure they are, but I'm also sure the coaches prepare for that scenario.

Yes, #5 is the top QB in the state and there are really not enough words/space to describe his talent in this post, but #7 is very talented too, as is the rest of the team, let's not overlook them. They were playing a talented team, with lots of speed and a great offense/deffense. WOS was missing one of the top, if not THE top RB in the state and they overcame.
They deserve credit for a great game played.
And on the other hand, Giddings deserves credit, for a well played game last night too.

Congratulations Stangs!! The best of luck next week .
:clap: :clap: :clap:

.......by the way, the refs weren't "that" bad. :D but if you think about it, every game and every sport has bad calls and usually not so great refs/umps. So I guess we should be used to it.

I know, I know, you don't have to say it......"STICK TO SOFTBALL"
lol

Thank you for noticing this, it seems like not very many people on this board want to even think that giddins can be like this! Your observations are appreciated, your coming out with it is more appreciated!

Crimestick

11-25-2007, 12:53 AM

Originally posted by buff4ever
Well I can't say anyone on this thread thus far has surprised me any.

Congratulations to WOS, you guys have a great ball club, good luck the rest of the way.

To the sore winners out there who I can't believe are talking about the officials, are you insane? I wasn't going to bring it up, even though we lost, but there were some questionable calls that hurt us or could have helped us if they had been made or made the other way. But I will agree, they didn't change the outcome of the game either way. I just can't believe that WOS posters brought up the officiating after that win.

The difference in the game was the 95 yard kick off return. That made the 28 to 19 spread that proved to be too much for the buffs to come back from. The two score separation put us in a bind. Changed the play calling options when we later made it to the WOS 3 yard line. Heck even a field goal at that point would have POTENTIALLY won it had it still been 21 to 19, I UNDERSTAND THIS WASN'T THE CASE THOUGH.

Now to address the giddings haters out there who think we are the dirtiest team in america. The boys made the town proud last night. They faught hard till the end with class. There was ONE late hit, that's right ONE; and I truly believe the lineman thought the play was still going. I think WOS played with a lot of class as well even though they had more personal fouls than us.

NOTE: I was right about this game in some ways, wrong in one. I thought that it would be a defensive war, which both defenses are VERY good, but there were more points scored than I thought. I did say that if either team scored 28 they would win. I would have bet you that if giddings scored 3 tds that they would have won. I would have lost that bet.

LOCKE played one hell of a game for getting thrown in there against a very fast wos defense. Like i have stated, i would have thought his 3 tds would have won this game. WOS offense was better than I thought, of course they did very well at running right at us, OUR WEAKNESS this year and last.

Some of you may agree or disagree with me, I just can't say I expected to get on here and read some of the crap i did. We are proud of our buffs, this year this week the breaks went the other way.

Once again good luck to WOS.

I'm not being a sore winner. It was simply something that surprised me. I even noted that there were likely calls that were just as bad that benefitted us. Sheesh!

crazy

11-25-2007, 11:19 AM

To BUFF

DUDE...I DID give credit to Giddings on the other thread and yet you turned it around and said it was pathetic. ALL you saw was that I said the officiating sucked (and it DID). I said that Giddings was huge, were tough and played hard the whole night. YOU are the one who kept ranting on the game. You wanna talk about "class"? Your h/c wouldn't shake hands with our h/c. How's THAT for class? I saw our players talking and hugging some of your players after the game. That was nice.

We are talking about the game. WE thought the officiating sucked. It's our opinion on the game. If you don't like, you can disagree, but don't call me or anybody else "pathetic" because of our opinion. YOU are the sore loser.

20FAN07

11-25-2007, 11:36 AM

the officiating was pretty lame

buff4ever

11-25-2007, 12:29 PM

Agree the officiating might have been not perfect, but it definetely didn't hurt either team more than the other.

I am sorry for our coach being like that, and I have stated in places that players from both sides acted with class after the game, I witnessed the same thing you did. Your head coach also found #7 Locke after the game and had a conversation with him that looked very genuine from where I was.

Not necessarily you, but some people on this thread just really skewed the view on the game.

zebrablue2

11-25-2007, 12:37 PM

Originally posted by 20FAN07
the officiating was pretty lame

what did the officials do that was so lame?

20FAN07

11-25-2007, 01:05 PM

Some of the calls just weren't correct, not putting anything against any team b/c they both played well. I know you can't blame refs, but some of the calls just weren't correct. There were a couple that i thought were fishy for both teams and there were some that weren't even called when it was pretty evident. Refs can't see everything, but it could've been better. Congrats to the Giddings team and good luck to Brock at UT (that hurts sayin that "Gig'em")

griff

11-25-2007, 01:11 PM

The officiating wasn't that bad. I've seen much worse. The only call I strongly disagreed with was the pass interference. I thought the receiver pulled the defender to the ground, yet the defender was penalized. There were a few occassions where the refs did not see personal fouls made by Giddings, but they did catch some of them. Overall, the officiating did NOT determine the outcome of the game.

20FAN07

11-25-2007, 01:16 PM

your right, it didnt determine the game. I thought the interference was a bad call. There were alot going on by both kids, but i have to agree with the offensive guy pulling him down. If anything i thought it would be offensive, but i wouldn't have called anything..like i said there was alot going on by both kids

griff

11-25-2007, 01:19 PM

Originally posted by buff4ever
I think WOS played with a lot of class as well even though they had more personal fouls than us.

You have got to be kidding! This is one reason why the thread hasn't retired. You had to throw in this little jab, didn't you. Talk about a "skewed view of the game". :rolleyes:

Do you even wonder for a moment with so many schools other than WO-S mentioning the dirty play of Giddings this year and in the past three years that maybe...just MAYBE...there is a problem? Hmmmm...?

Like I stated earlier...it all falls in the lap of the coaches. Fitzhenry not shaking hands withour coach is just another symptom of the real problem.

IHStangFan

11-25-2007, 01:26 PM

Originally posted by griff
You have got to be kidding! This is one reason why the thread hasn't retired. You had to throw in this little jab, didn't you. Talk about a "skewed view of the game". :rolleyes:

Do you even wonder for a moment with so many schools other than WO-S mentioning the dirty play of Giddings this year and in the past three years that maybe...just MAYBE...there is a problem? Hmmmm...?

Like I stated earlier...it all falls in the lap of the coaches. Fitzhenry not shaking hands withour coach is just another symptom of the real problem. to hell w/ it griff....let whoever thinks the need to "get a jab" get it if they think it'll make em feel better. Bottom line is...WOS advances, Giddings is at home. I don' t know why you guys are still in here beating a dead horse and arguing about it. Let em get their jabs to an empty house in this thread. Talk to the walls. Let's start lookin forward to this week instead of arguing about last week. :)

griff

11-25-2007, 01:32 PM

By the way...my apologies for confusing the two "buff4" twins in the "Congratulations to Giddings" thread. Your usernames and comments are so much alike.

My congratulations to Giddings on a fine season. You have an excellent team and I'm glad we met up again this year. Both teams played hard, both defenses were tested, and it was a very entertaining game to watch. Giddings was worthy of their #1 ranking.

WOS1

11-25-2007, 01:54 PM

Guys, I am with Buff on this one. I really don't know why the officiating thing was brought up. Yes, I did disagree with the PI in the 4th quarter, but they didn't score on that drive so it did not hurt us. I also remember a pass early in the 3rd quarter where the official could have easily called PI on us and he didn't. They ended up scoring on that drive anyway, so I don't really see an issue. There are always going to be close calls and one side will think it's bad and the other good. I really don't see why this was brought up.

As for the personal fouls. WOS had one in the beginning of the game for unnecessary roughness. Giddings had a minimum of 3 of them. They were not even close. I will say that I did not see near as much taunting by the Giddings players.

pirate4state

11-25-2007, 02:54 PM

Originally posted by WOS1
Guys, I am with Buff on this one. I really don't know why the officiating thing was brought up. Yes, I did disagree with the PI in the 4th quarter, but they didn't score on that drive so it did not hurt us. I also remember a pass early in the 3rd quarter where the official could have easily called PI on us and he didn't. They ended up scoring on that drive anyway, so I don't really see an issue. There are always going to be close calls and one side will think it's bad and the other good. I really don't see why this was brought up.

As for the personal fouls. WOS had one in the beginning of the game for unnecessary roughness. Giddings had a minimum of 3 of them. They were not even close. I will say that I did not see near as much taunting by the Giddings players.

I agree. As someone who had no vested interest other than hoping to watch a really good game, I didn't think the refs were THAT bad. There are always gonna be missed calls, but none of them really had any effect on the outcome of the game.

Congrats to the Buffs on a good season.

WOS is the fastest team I've seen this year. They are a tad faster than Cuero, but their offense is no where near as explosive! I would have liked them to attack rather than sit on the lead. Maybe the Giddings defense had something to do with that too, but some of the play calling in the 2nd half was troubling. No offense intended.

I talked about this with the WOS bunch that was kind enough to invite me to go hang with them after the game! :thumbsup: Thanks guys - it was fun & I really enjoyed meeting everyone. I'll have a pic up later this afternoon.

Good luck to WOS next week against the Pirates!! Save me a seat!! :)

Old Tiger

11-25-2007, 02:55 PM

WO-S owns Giddings?

1st and goal

11-25-2007, 03:38 PM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
to hell w/ it griff....let whoever thinks the need to "get a jab" get it if they think it'll make em feel better. Bottom line is...WOS advances, Giddings is at home. I don' t know why you guys are still in here beating a dead horse and arguing about it. Let em get their jabs to an empty house in this thread. Talk to the walls. Let's start lookin forward to this week instead of arguing about last week. :)

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black...Stangfan whats your dog in this fight??? The loss your team suffered was last week. 1 player on your team played dirtier than almost any team I've seen this year except for maybe 1 player on Wimberley.

Your posts do nothing except show us you are a very sore loser.

My hat is off to WO-S, your team and your coach really excelled. I've got video of the whole game. When I get time I'll look at it closer. I'm with the pirate lady, I think the ref's called a decent game. Your team may have missed the brother running back but my hat is off to the one that played. He really brought his A game. He kept Gidding's D in check and really moved the ball well.

It sure is lame that 2 teams of this talent have to play so early every year lately(in the playoffs). This could have easily been a state championship game.
WO-S still has a uphill battle. Good luck the rest of the way. I may come watch you guys play again if you play closer to Austin later on.

Again, Good luck.

WOS1

11-25-2007, 05:48 PM

Originally posted by pirate4state
I agree. As someone who had no vested interest other than hoping to watch a really good game, I didn't think the refs were THAT bad. There are always gonna be missed calls, but none of them really had any effect on the outcome of the game.

Congrats to the Buffs on a good season.

WOS is the fastest team I've seen this year. They are a tad faster than Cuero, but their offense is no where near as explosive! I would have liked them to attack rather than sit on the lead. Maybe the Giddings defense had something to do with that too, but some of the play calling in the 2nd half was troubling. No offense intended.

I talked about this with the WOS bunch that was kind enough to invite me to go hang with them after the game! :thumbsup: Thanks guys - it was fun & I really enjoyed meeting everyone. I'll have a pic up later this afternoon.

Good luck to WOS next week against the Pirates!! Save me a seat!! :)

We really enjoyed your company Pirate!!! Thanks for coming!!! You and softball mom have a seat waiting right next to me next week...;)

BTW- thanks for the updates.:D

whtfbplaya

11-25-2007, 06:17 PM

Originally posted by crazy
I agree with you Crime...it was a poorly officiated game. It very well could have made a difference in the game. They tried to do everything they could to give it to Giddings. The PI was crap! Their receiver was behind our defender and their receiver pulled our guy down (both were facing the ball) and WE got the PI! BULLBUTTER! The fumble was crap, too, just like you said. He was clearly down and the whistle had blown, yet they called it a fumble and gave it to Giddings. There were several illegal blocks they didn't call against Giddings. I hate having to play Refs, too. I'm so proud of our Mustangs.

It was not the best officiated, but in no way bad. Trust me it can always be better.
I thought the PI was could have been a no call, but the defense did run into him early with his eyes off the ball, then the offense pulled him at the last second.
The fumble was a great call, he was not down and there was not a whistle blown.:hand:
I will look for the blocks, but my hunch is you guess on that stuff too.

I thought the first pf could have been a no call, because I dont think the defender knew the qb did not have the ball anymore.
I thought that there could have been holding on wos on a pass ruled uncatchable up the middle of the field.
I also would have called kick catch int. on wos on the punt before halftime.

pirate4state

11-25-2007, 06:39 PM

Originally posted by WOS1
We really enjoyed your company Pirate!!! Thanks for coming!!! You and softball mom have a seat waiting right next to me next week...;)

BTW- thanks for the updates.:D

:thumbsup: Cool!

Mustangpride09

11-25-2007, 07:33 PM

Funny to see what happened when no 19 year olds were on the field.

pirate4state

11-25-2007, 07:34 PM

Originally posted by Mustangpride09
Funny to see what happened when no 19 year olds were on the field. :doh: :doh: let it go, please....

Mustangpride09

11-25-2007, 07:44 PM

Originally posted by pirate4state
:doh: :doh: let it go, please....

lol. It was too tempting, sorry.

IHStangFan

11-25-2007, 07:57 PM

Originally posted by 1st and goal
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black...Stangfan whats your dog in this fight??? The loss your team suffered was last week. 1 player on your team played dirtier than almost any team I've seen this year except for maybe 1 player on Wimberley.

Your posts do nothing except show us you are a very sore loser.

My hat is off to WO-S, your team and your coach really excelled. I've got video of the whole game. When I get time I'll look at it closer. I'm with the pirate lady, I think the ref's called a decent game. Your team may have missed the brother running back but my hat is off to the one that played. He really brought his A game. He kept Gidding's D in check and really moved the ball well.

It sure is lame that 2 teams of this talent have to play so early every year lately(in the playoffs). This could have easily been a state championship game.
WO-S still has a uphill battle. Good luck the rest of the way. I may come watch you guys play again if you play closer to Austin later on.

Again, Good luck. why do I have to have a dog in the fight (what is it w/ you people and a "dog in the fight") to say that this thread is the poster thread for beating a dead horse? OH...I might also have an interest because of the fact I picked WOS to win a title before the season started....do a search and look it up. Thanks for noticing me over here :wave:

setxsports

11-25-2007, 08:04 PM

Thanks IHS!! Pick WOS next year and the year after to. WOS is full of Sophmores and Jr's..:D

pirate4state

11-25-2007, 08:09 PM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
why do I have to have a dog in the fight (what is it w/ you people and a "dog in the fight") to say that this thread is the poster thread for beating a dead horse? OH...I might also have an interest because of the fact I picked WOS to win a title before the season started....do a search and look it up. Thanks for noticing me over here :wave:

I think you need to add the WOS Mustang to your sig :D

IHStangFan

11-25-2007, 09:04 PM

Originally posted by pirate4state
I think you need to add the WOS Mustang to your sig :D no because then I'd be "jumping on a bandwagon" even though you can go back and see where I picked them early in the season to win a title. Matter of fact....heres one of them where I say they play in the title game...

2nd to last post (http://bbs.3adownlow.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=68662&highlight=state+title)

Gobbla2001

11-25-2007, 09:06 PM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
heres one of them where I say they play in the title game...

2nd to last post (http://bbs.3adownlow.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=68662&highlight=state+title)

I wouldn't have brought that up because it's wrong :p

IHStangFan

11-25-2007, 09:07 PM

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
I wouldn't have brought that up because it's wrong :p just backing up where I had said it early on so as to not be called a "bandwagon jumper" :p

Gobbla2001

11-25-2007, 09:08 PM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
just backing up where I had said it early on so as to not be called a "bandwagon jumper" :p

whatever :rolleyes:

:D

IHStangFan

11-25-2007, 09:09 PM

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
whatever :rolleyes:

:D LOL....I believe the date on that post was what....8/8/07? :p They've got a very tough game this week though....I'll be listening in!

ronwx5x

11-25-2007, 09:11 PM

Originally posted by Mustangpride09
Funny to see what happened when no 19 year olds were on the field.
What makes you thinks there were no 19 year olds on the field? I think there were probably several.

buff4life

11-25-2007, 10:04 PM

Originally posted by whtfbplaya
It was not the best officiated, but in no way bad. Trust me it can always be better.
I thought the PI was could have been a no call, but the defense did run into him early with his eyes off the ball, then the offense pulled him at the last second.
The fumble was a great call, he was not down and there was not a whistle blown.:hand:
I will look for the blocks, but my hunch is you guess on that stuff too.

I thought the first pf could have been a no call, because I dont think the defender knew the qb did not have the ball anymore.
I thought that there could have been holding on wos on a pass ruled uncatchable up the middle of the field.
I also would have called kick catch int. on wos on the punt before halftime.

thought i might have been the only one to think that, but i wasn't voicing any of it, it would have been turned in my face....

3aSoftball4Mom

11-26-2007, 12:33 AM

Originally posted by WOS1
Thanks for coming!!! You and softball mom have a seat waiting right next to me next week...;)

:D Thanks!
"The daughter" says we ARE coming to the game.
I'm still thinking about it.
We are kind of missing the extended season, since my son-in-law's team is out of it so soon. We have gone into the middle of Dec. the last several years.
It was great meeting all of you guys.

Good luck to the Stangs! I had you picked for the State CH. too.

TexanFan4Life

11-26-2007, 01:33 AM

Originally posted by 3aSoftball4Mom
:D Thanks!
"The daughter" says we ARE coming to the game.
I'm still thinking about it.
We are kind of missing the extended season, since my son-in-law's team is out of it so soon. We have gone into the middle of Dec. the last several years.
It was great meeting all of you guys.

Good luck to the Stangs! I had you picked for the State CH. too.

You going to the WO-S game Friday?

3aSoftball4Mom

11-26-2007, 01:51 AM

Originally posted by TexanFan4Life
You going to the WO-S game Friday?

we're thinking about it.

R4Editor

11-26-2007, 10:06 AM

Originally posted by IHStangFan
no because then I'd be "jumping on a bandwagon" even though you can go back and see where I picked them early in the season to win a title. Matter of fact....heres one of them where I say they play in the title game...

2nd to last post (http://bbs.3adownlow.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=68662&highlight=state+title) there not quite there yet, but if they get by the Region 4 team then u can lay claim to picking them to reach the state title game.

48minutes

11-26-2007, 04:07 PM

Have not been on since the game, but I wanted to say Congrats to a great WOS team. They played good, and had great class. :)

To the buffs, good season. You guys are alot better than alot of teams still in it, unfortunate that two great teams have to meet so early. Just like last year, WOS was better than most teams left in it.

I was very shocked to see Locke put up what should have been 21 points against the WOS defense. I would have thought that would be enough to get a win with the defense the buffs have had, but oh well. Congrats WOS and good luck to your team

Old Tiger

11-26-2007, 04:09 PM

We can all Agree Fitzhenry is going to have fun at UT with Deon and Earl :)

X Man

11-26-2007, 08:53 PM

The difference in the game was the 95 yard kick off return. That made the 28 to 19 spread that proved to be too much for the buffs to come back from. The two score separation put us in a bind. Changed the play calling options when we later made it to the WOS 3 yard line. Heck even a field goal at that point would have POTENTIALLY won it had it still been 21 to 19, I UNDERSTAND THIS WASN'T THE CASE THOUGH.

I think the player that ran this back, is a sophomore!

IHStangFan

11-26-2007, 10:26 PM

Originally posted by R4Editor
there not quite there yet, but if they get by the Region 4 team then u can lay claim to picking them to reach the state title game. maybe you missed what I was trying to say...I KNOW they're not there yet.....what I was saying is ...I PICKED them ....you know....prediction.....to be in the title game. Here is a quote from 8/8/07 that I posted:

"agreed, I have WOS favored to make a champ. appearance, perhaps Giddings. Both from Reg. III."

so...I'm not sure what you mean.."then you can lay claim if they get by reg. IV." I PICKED THEM AS A FAV. BEFORE THE SEASON. I'm not saying they're IN the game yet...I said they WOULD be. If I am proved wrong..then my prediction was inaccurate. As far as having to wait to lay claim to something...no...I've already claimed I THOUGHT they'd make the title game. That's how predictions work...you PREDICT something will happen before it happens.
:p

WOS1

11-26-2007, 10:52 PM

Originally posted by X Man
The difference in the game was the 95 yard kick off return. That made the 28 to 19 spread that proved to be too much for the buffs to come back from. The two score separation put us in a bind. Changed the play calling options when we later made it to the WOS 3 yard line. Heck even a field goal at that point would have POTENTIALLY won it had it still been 21 to 19, I UNDERSTAND THIS WASN'T THE CASE THOUGH.

I think the player that ran this back, is a sophomore!

He's a Junior.