PDA

View Full Version : Graham Students, teachers face off over T-shirt



KTA
10-25-2007, 08:57 PM
Students, teachers face off over T-shirt
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Christopher T. Hunnewell



It was just a T-shirt worn by Graham High School students on a Friday with no football game.
The dark-blue garment donned by around 80 kids had a simple message in white letters spelling “A-Day, B-Day” on the front and “Those were the good days” on the back.
But before the day was over, issues were raised regarding the school’s authority, rights of free speech and the willingness of future leaders to endure sacrifice for what they believed to be right.



“This is the first time,” said Curtis Ribble, “the students have worked together on anything.”
And for most of the students, the T-shirt was not a “big deal.”
What was a big deal, were changes GHS students have faced since school began in August.
GHS upperclassmen found the big deal as they stepped into their school’s hallways for the Fall 2007 semester where changes happened overnight. For nearly 15 years, most students attended classes under a college style system — A-days and B-days — where they attended certain classes on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, while others fell on Tuesday and Thursdays.
The former schedule offered students and teachers longer class time each day and more time to concentrate on homework and extracurricular activities. However, because the state’s educational requirements mandated a change in credit requirements to graduate, GHS was forced to reinstate the traditional eight-class-a-day week. That change displeased many in the student body already feeling pressured by circumstances beyond their control.


Other changes included the confusion caused by the recent renovation of the entire campus starting with razing of the old gym at the main GHS building for a new library. With construction, students found the main GHS hallway crowded as the passageway was literally cut in half with a white plywood wall. The claustrophobic conditions were compounded with irritating grinding and needle-gun sounds reverberating constantly throughout the building as workers prepared the space.
“This last eight weeks have been total chaos,” said Leaann Buckalew while bringing her daughter another T-shirt. “With the All American Girl Pageant, they don’t have time to prepare and Ricki has missed tennis twice. They want to prepare these kids for college, but I can also see both points.
“My problem is that as parents we’d like some answers. We’ve heard everything from they are saving $400,000 in salaries (by not having A and B classes) and all because the Texas mandate or that we didn’t score high enough on the TAKS test last year. We were only academically acceptable.”
The situation was ridiculous, Buckalew added, but very creative on the part of the kids.
“The kids didn’t stand out here and throw rocks,” she said. “If the administration had let it go, it would have blown over in 15 or 30 minutes.”
Most students interviewed understood the changes were unavoidable, necessary and welcome. Yet, they couldn’t help but feel bitter at the destruction of the familiar during a time they wanted to recall with fond memories. Seniors were also frustrated because they would not be able to enjoy the benefits.
“It is about change,” said GHS Principal Delesa Styles. “The seniors are upset that we are disrupting their senior year with construction. I’ve talked to seniors, and they say they want to remember the building as it was. But it’s part of progress. Our school is making progress.”
In an effort to offset the changes, Styles explained, the school has tried to provide as much structure and routine as possible. Yet, the rules were the rules.
Earlier in the year, after word got out that students were considering buying the “A-Day, B-Day” T-shirts, Dean of Students Jerry Gibson spoke with a couple of students, Styles added, and told them that the school’s primary function is to promote learning and, therefore, any T-shirt that interferes with the learning environment would not be approved.
“Any kind of club or organizations must be approved,” Styles said. “They didn’t ask for permission, but they were specifically talked to about those shirts last night.”
Styles said her main concern was that an independent group tried to make choices in an effort to see how the school would respond, “or if anything would happen.”
“Our campus goal is to provide a safe learning environment with attendance, behavior and learning,” Styles said. “So it’s not about the T-shirts but about enforcing policies and rules. There’s nothing offensive about the shirt — it’s the behavior associated with the shirts.”
The other concern, she added, is that if the issue wasn’t addressed, what would happen next?
“It is a great shirt to wear for the weekend,” Styles said. “ But if I’m to prepare these kids for the work world, they have to understand that sometimes we change hats. There is a time and a place for specific types of dress.”
Without official sanction, student leaders proposed the idea of remembering the former class schedule and peacefully venting their frustration weeks before the Oct. 19 standoff. Organizers approached their classmates with the opportunity to buy the shirts and show their solidarity during National Freedom of Speech Week.
“If she could have afforded the price of a shirt,” said one parent, “my daughter would have been wearing one, too.”
Gibson, Styles pointed out, outlined to the students that though the shirts didn’t meet the restrictions of garments with either lewd words or symbols and didn’t promote violence, gangs or substance abuse, it was the administration’s conclusion that the shirts would be a disruption of classes. Referencing the student handbook and code of conduct, which all the students signed, the student leaders were informed that the principal had the authority to ban any item of clothing deemed disruptive to the main objective of all school: education.
“In no shape or form was this something we were going to take action on and march on the administration,” said Chance Moreland, historian for the Thespian Club. “We know they won’t change the schedule, we just wanted to say something funny.”
Considering the action to be harmless fun, student leaders assumed that the administration could not control a strong show of solidarity and put out the word that everyone with a shirt should wear them Friday. But the students were wrong as teachers met students at the doors or in parking lots and directed them to remove the shirts, change into another or go home and change.
“I didn’t think it was going to be a big deal when I pulled up this morning,” Moreland said. “I thought the administration was going to ignore it, and everyone else would say ‘oh well, pooh’ and give it up. But when I got out there, where there are normally one or two teachers, they had extra help trying to get people out of their cars to see their shirts. People would walk by and they’d say, ‘you, you and you, go home, go home, go home.’”
Many students said they were not aware of the consequences if they wore the shirts but simply thought it was “a cool shirt.”
“We’re just doing this, we didn’t know we would get in trouble about it,” said Shannon Dockstader. “I’m not sure why they are making it a big deal. We talked about how we liked A Day and B Day, and they are getting mad about it.”
Though the administration was firm that the shirts would not be allowed in class, the debate did not get tense. The only authorities enforcing the rule were the educators. The most notable use of force was the sight of a diminutive teacher with her head barely reaching the top of a young man’s shoulder as she grasped him firmly by the elbow and guided him politely to the administration office to change. Meanwhile, coaches with voices capable of rattling a chain length fence on the playing field quietly offered “no comment” and directed their charges with a nod to class.
When one boy was informed he couldn’t wear the shirt, he proceeded to revert from shirt to skin and started for class before teachers stopped his progress.
By 9 a.m., the sunshine patriots and summer soldiers whom Thomas Payne wrote about more than 200 years ago had ditched their uniforms for civvies.
“They’re all rock stars given the chance,” said one teacher.
Yet, others were firmly resolved in their belief to carry through something they believed to be right. Lesley Gatlin and Amanda Cerecedez refused to compromise by changing shirts or “signing out” for the day but held their heads up and accepted in school suspension. Gatlin had refused to remove her T-shirt but removed it as she made her way for a day in “The Little House on the Prairie” as the I.S.S. Building is referred.
“She didn’t care,” said an unidentified girl. “But she has the full support of the student body.”
Leaving their classes, kids donned the blue shirts as a comfortable option to the low 90-degree temperatures of mid afternoon. Few, such as Ricki Buckalew and Cerecedez, had any regrets.
“If we didn’t do this that would be going back on our word,” said Ricki. “We’re making a statement, and we can’t just take it back as soon as the administration says so.”
“We didn’t mean it as a political statement,” Cerecedez said. “We just wanted to remember things the way they were.”

Cameron Crazy
10-25-2007, 09:00 PM
Yup. Those were great!

Ranger Mom
10-25-2007, 09:15 PM
Maybe I missed something because the article was so long I couldn't keep reading.

But I don't understand what the big deal is....they probably WERE the good old days!!

slpybear the bullfan
10-25-2007, 09:20 PM
*sigh*


I think the my twenties were good old days!:D

Big Papa
10-25-2007, 09:23 PM
thats pretty interesting...i dont understand why the school didnt let them wear the shirts...it didnt seem too disruptive to me

AP Panther Fan
10-25-2007, 09:25 PM
That's crazy, they really didn't violate the dress code, in my opinion....

I think it was a bad move by school officials...no offensive language, signs etc....good grief!

BobcatBenny
10-25-2007, 09:26 PM
I don't get it either, but if my Roweena will have an opinion, I am sure I will Luuuuvvvv it! :D
http://www.jodysgarage.com/images/funny/griffith/ernest.jpg

Big Papa
10-25-2007, 09:30 PM
Originally posted by AP Panther Fan
That's crazy, they really didn't violate the dress code, in my opinion....

I think it was a bad move by school officials...no offensive language, signs etc....good grief!

i agreee....i dont see their reasoning wiht how it was going to be disruptive to the school day...it seemed like they(school admin) were only ones making a big deal about it

KTA
10-25-2007, 09:31 PM
I though this was crap as well...from my understanding the principal is a real female dog

westcoast54
10-25-2007, 10:04 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by KTA
[B]Students, teachers face off over T-shirt
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Christopher T. Hunnewell



It was just a T-shirt worn by Graham High School students on a Friday with no football game.
The dark-blue garment donned by around 80 kids had a simple message in white letters spelling “A-Day, B-Day” on the front and “Those were the good days” on the back.
But before the day was over, issues were raised regarding the school’s authority, rights of free speech and the willingness of future leaders to endure sacrifice for what they believed to be right.

I don't see the big deal myself and I'm a teacher in another district. However administrators haver the right, right or wrong, to deem clothing, hairstyles, whatever "inappropriate." Once they do that then the student must comply or suffer the consequences. As far as Free Speech goes, student's in a school don't really have the right to free speech. For example, an administrator must approve all stories in a school newspaper before it's released. They have the right to pull any story they feel is not in the best interest of the school and its students. Doesn't seem fair but that's the law.
Once again I don't agree with what the school did just shedding some light on the subject.

KTA
10-25-2007, 10:10 PM
reguardless its still CRAP

GreenMonster
10-25-2007, 10:48 PM
I agree with WestCoast, as a teacher it isn't my job to make the rules just enforce them. I don't have to agree with what my administrators want I just have to be a team player and do what is asked of me in those situations. Like he stated, it is their right to ban anything that they feel will be disruptive to the learning environment.

westcoast54
10-25-2007, 10:59 PM
Originally posted by GreenMonster
I agree with WestCoast, as a teacher it isn't my job to make the rules just enforce them. I don't have to agree with what my administrators want I just have to be a team player and do what is asked of me in those situations. Like he stated, it is their right to ban anything that they feel will be disruptive to the learning environment.

Thanks Green Monster. Did you get your certification complete? Let me know where your at in a PM.

KTA
10-25-2007, 11:21 PM
it is their right to ban anything that they feel will be disruptive to the learning environment.

GM this is not a shot towards you

Graham is a little up tight community where the littlest thing upsets people. How does this affect somebody learning environment? That's just like at wal-mart, there was a Maxim magazine calendar and they took it down because too many people griped about it....nothing worse then what sports illustrated shows.

The fact is they didn't like that the kids "revolted" against what the GISD had chosen to do, it had nothing to do with what the shirts said. Just kind of one of those "do it because I said so, and if you don't like it you can go home" kind of things.....total crap.

Power trip at its finest

RMAC
10-26-2007, 02:43 AM
This is nothing like the shirts some friends of mine made a few years ago w/ the whole Hirshi incident. But I understand both sides of the arguement. If the kids really wanted to be heard, they need to write the to the state. It wasn't the ISD's idea to have a state mandate changing credits, thus, their hands were tied. If they feel the shirts are taking away form learning, then they shouldn't be aloud. Ours sure weren't.

rockdale80
10-26-2007, 07:55 AM
Originally posted by RMAC
This is nothing like the shirts some friends of mine made a few years ago w/ the whole Hirshi incident. But I understand both sides of the arguement. If the kids really wanted to be heard, they need to write the to the state. It wasn't the ISD's idea to have a state mandate changing credits, thus, their hands were tied. If they feel the shirts are taking away form learning, then they shouldn't be aloud. Ours sure weren't.


I dont think those shirts should be aloud either. They need to keep quiet so everyone can concentrate. But I think they should be ALLOWED.

RMAC
10-26-2007, 08:46 AM
Originally posted by rockdale80
I dont think those shirts should be aloud either. They need to keep quiet so everyone can concentrate. But I think they should be ALLOWED.

sorry god i didn't notice my mistake at 245 in the morning. DA :rolleyes:

rockdale80
10-26-2007, 08:53 AM
Originally posted by RMAC
sorry god i didn't notice my mistake at 245 in the morning. DA :rolleyes:


Sorry buddy. I couldnt help it.

block&tackle
10-26-2007, 09:35 AM
Originally posted by GreenMonster
I agree with WestCoast, as a teacher it isn't my job to make the rules just enforce them. I don't have to agree with what my administrators want I just have to be a team player and do what is asked of me in those situations. Like he stated, it is their right to ban anything that they feel will be disruptive to the learning environment.
I understand and respect what you are saying, I just have a different point of view. When I was teaching I noticed that administrators tended to be made up of some of the best people and some of the worst - unfortunately the latter tended to be a larger group. I finally got to the point where I could no longer be a "team player" when working for the idiots.

The problem here is that a wise leader picks his/her battles and this was a foolish battle. The educational enviroment was disrupted more by the administration's decision to make a stand on this than it was by the students' t-shirts.

I found that I could tell how much an administrator was in love with the power by their decisions to make and enforce stupid rules. A bad administrator can have such a negative effect on so many peoples' lives (students and teachers). This story bothers me cause I have a feeling that that is what is happening in Graham.

Ranger Mom
10-26-2007, 09:48 AM
Originally posted by block&tackle


The problem here is that a wise leader picks his/her battles and this was a foolish battle. The educational enviroment was disrupted more by the administration's decision to make a stand on this than it was by the students' t-shirts.



I think that summed up exactly how I feel too!!!

Good Job!!!:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

GreenMonster
10-26-2007, 09:51 AM
Originally posted by block&tackle

The educational enviroment was disrupted more by the administration's decision to make a stand on this than it was by the students' t-shirts.


I think this comment sums this entire episode up in a nutshell. This was a lame attempt by the administrators to make a statement that they are in control. Regardless of how stupid I feel an administrator's decision is though, I am still paid to do what my boss tells me to do. It doesn't matter if I work in a school, a bank, an office, a factory, or in the military, if I don't do my job that has been assigned to me then I won't have that job for very much longer. I choose to do my job.

block&tackle
10-26-2007, 10:04 AM
Like I said, I respect that. I wasn't able to do that but that was my problem. If there weren't people like you we would be in serious trouble.