PDA

View Full Version : This guy is a nutcase...



Maroon87
10-18-2007, 09:53 AM
..but he actually has a valid point, IMO. Thoughts?

Former player Bryant sues NFL over drug testing

By P. SOLOMON BANDA - Associated Press Writer




DENVER (AP) -Former San Francisco receiver Antonio Bryant filed a lawsuit Wednesday seeking to stop the NFL from requiring him to submit to drug testing, arguing the league's policy doesn't apply to him anymore.

The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court states the 49ers terminated Bryant's contract March 1, meaning: ``Antonio Bryant is not a `player,' not an employee or not under contract to the Defendants in any form or fashion.''

Letters sent to Bryant by the NFL, which were part of court documents filed Wednesday, show the NFL asked him to submit to a urinalysis on Sept. 6, 13, and 18 and threatened him with discipline equivalent to a positive test if he didn't cooperate.

Bryant's agent and attorney, Peter Schaffer, said his client had been randomly tested since he left the 49ers, but decided he was under no obligation to take them.

``It doesn't make any sense at all,'' Schaffer said of the NFL's testing of Bryant.

Bryant's lawsuit asks a judge for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order prohibiting the NFL from administering tests or sharing the results of those tests. It also asks the court to prohibit the NFL from telling teams that Bryant faces suspension should they decide to sign him.

As for what teams Bryant might be considering or whether he would play in the NFL again, Schaffer said his client is keeping his options open.

A message left after business hours for NFL spokesman Greg Aiello was not returned. A phone number listed for Bryant, who lives in Coppell, Texas, was inoperable.

The lawsuit was filed in Colorado because Schaffer is based in the state.

Bryant was released in March, just one season after he signed a four-year contract with the 49ers worth $14 million.

Bryant caught 40 passes last season for a team-leading 733 yards. But he repeatedly clashed with coach Mike Nolan and was suspended four games for violating the NFL's substance-abuse policy.

Bryant won the Biletnikoff Award as the NCAA's best receiver as a sophomore at Pitt. He played for Dallas and Cleveland before joining the 49ers.

In May, Bryant pleaded no contest to reckless driving and was sentenced to a year's probation for going more than 100 mph through San Mateo, Calif.

3afan
10-18-2007, 09:55 AM
wonder why he's skeered to take a drug test? :thinking:

Maroon87
10-18-2007, 09:58 AM
Originally posted by 3afan
wonder why he's skeered to take a drug test? :thinking:

I'll give you 3 guesses but you'll only need one...;)

Actually I think it's a valid complaint because he is not on an active roster nor is he apparently in negtioations to return.

pirate4state
10-18-2007, 10:01 AM
He has a valid point, but if he has nothing to hide take the tests unless he has to pay for them. :thinking:

piratebg
10-18-2007, 10:03 AM
Well, I can definitely see his point. He has a good one, but I also think he is kind of admitting guilt as well. I mean, how hard is it to pee in a cup to prove your innocence?

kaorder1999
10-18-2007, 10:07 AM
I didnt read the entire story but my opinion is if he is no longer in the league and is no longer under contract with a team or the NFl then quit wasting the time to test him. Worry about the ones that are in the league now that need it. I would make him sign something that says if they are to no longer test him then he can neve rplay in the NFL again.

burnet44
10-18-2007, 10:08 AM
Originally posted by Maroon87


The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court states the 49ers terminated Bryant's contract March 1, meaning: ``Antonio Bryant is not a `player,' not an employee or not under contract to the Defendants in any form or fashion.''


In May, Bryant pleaded no contest to reckless driving and was sentenced to a year's probation for going more than 100 mph through San Mateo, Calif.

1. Is this testing part of his probation?
maybe the NFL is testing him for the court?
Maybe he was employed by the league when he was placed on probation
2. The NFL continues to test him because if he wants to get back into the league he must be clean
3. People who dont want to be tested are afraid of being caught

while I agree he isnt employed by the NFL they can test him for drugs if he wants to be a part of the league
I would say ok no testing, but you will never play in the league
no testing no league simple enough

"not an employee or not under contract to the Defendants in any form or fashion"
cool so how can you sue someone you are not an employee too\

"It also asks the court to prohibit the NFL from telling teams that Bryant faces suspension should they decide to sign him.

As for what teams Bryant might be considering or whether he would play in the NFL again, Schaffer said his client is keeping his options open."

so is the NFL by testing him
no test no league

fire away

Maroon87
10-18-2007, 10:11 AM
Originally posted by burnet44


As for what teams Bryant might be considering or whether he would play in the NFL again, Schaffer said his client is keeping his options open."

so is the NFL by testing him
no test no league

fire away


I'm OK with that part of it...if he were in negotioations with an NFL club I'd say definitely test him, but if he's just sitting out not playing I don't see the point. and yes I'm sure he's dirty but that doesn't give the NFL a right to overstep it's boundaries, unless it's a provision of the substance abuse policy.