PDA

View Full Version : Bonds to sue Shilling?



JasperDog94
08-16-2007, 03:59 PM
Link (http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=txbondsschilling&prov=st&type=lgns)

Bonds reportedly preparing to sue Schilling
August 16, 2007

NEW YORK (TICKER) -- Barry Bonds has bolstered his legal team and could be preparing to slap a lawsuit on Curt Schilling, the New York Daily News reported on its web site Thursday.

According to the report, Bonds retained San Francisco attorney Todd Schneider and Oakland attorney John Burris to represent him in a possible defamation lawsuit against the veteran Boston Red Sox pitcher.

"There's no guarantee any action will be taken," Burris told the newspaper. "The most important thing to communicate is that Barry's silence up until now is not an admission to anything."

Bonds, who hit career home run No. 756 on August 7 to pass Hank Aaron for the most in baseball history, already is the subject of the BALCO steroids investigation and is represented by Michael Rains in that matter. The BALCO grand jury reconvenes next month.

On the HBO program "Costas Now," Schilling discussed Bonds' former mistress, Kimberly Bell, and her potentially damaging grand-jury testimony. She reportedly testified that Bonds told her about his steroid use.

"If I wrote a book about Bob Costas and in that book I wrote about Bob Costas' girlfriend being on the road, and Bob Costas giving that girlfriend card-show money and I outlined your daily steroid regimen, I've got to believe your first line of defense is to sue my (butt) off," Schilling said on the program.

Schneider and Burris issued joint statements, the newspaper reported.

"Mr. Bonds retained Schneider and Burris because of the false nature of these statements," the statement read. "While pursuing Hank Aaron's home run record, Barry felt that it was more prudent to remain silent. Now that the record has been broken, Burris and Schneider will evaluate any and all statements attributed to him that are false."

Bonds belted his 759th career homer on Wednesday night against the Atlanta Braves.

Old Tiger
08-16-2007, 03:59 PM
To bad Johnny C. is no longer alive or he might win this one.

JasperDog94
08-16-2007, 04:02 PM
Is this Bonds just trying to keep attention on himself? It sure seems that way to me.

Old Tiger
08-16-2007, 04:06 PM
This is not as rediculous as this;


Rutgers basketball player sues Imus
The Associated Press

11:29 AM EDT, August 15, 2007

Don Imus is facing new legal woes.

Kia Vaughn, a basketball player for the Rutgers women's team, sued Imus for slander and character defamation on Tuesday, the same day Imus settled with his former employer, CBS Radio, in a deal that allows him to return to the airwaves.

The radio personality had threatened CBS with a breach-of-contract lawsuit for $120 million after he was fired for making racially insensitive remarks about the team.

Vaughn's lawsuit, believed to be the first by a player, says Imus and his former co-host Bernard McGuirk -- along with CBS Corp., CBS Radio, MSNBC, and other media outlets that broadcast his show -- are legally responsible for damage done to her character and reputation. There is no dollar amount listed in the suit.

"This is about Kia Vaughn's good name," said Vaughn attorney Richard Ancowitz. "She would do anything to return to her life as a student and respected basketball player -- a more simple life before Imus opened his mouth." Imus referred to the basketball players as "nappy-headed hos" on his nationally syndicated radio program April 4 and became the target of heated protests. He was fired shortly after.

The Vaughn suit claims that the comments were made in the context of a news or sports report and therefore Imus had certain standards to abide by but ignored them. Vaughn was humiliated, embarrassed and publicly mocked for the comments, the suit claims.

A telephone message left for Imus's attorney was not immediately returned. There was no phone listing for McGuirk in the New York area. CBS Radio and CBS Corp. declined to comment. MSNBC said it hadn't seen the lawsuit. Viacom, Inc., NBC Universal, Inc. and Westwood One Radio, Inc., also named as defendants in the suit, didn't immediately return calls seeking comment.

Rutgers women's basketball program spokeswoman Stacey Brann said the university had no comment on the lawsuit. She didn't know if other players had filed lawsuits.

Vaughn, a junior from the Bronx who was a center on the team, had spoken out about Imus on Oprah Winfrey's talk show in April.

She said the comments overshadowed her team's amazing season -- the women reached the national finals but lost the championship game to Tennessee on April 3.

"Our moment was stolen from us," Vaughn said. "Instead of us coming here to enjoy what we accomplished and how far we came, we had to sit back and look at media asking questions about what he said." Terms of Imus's settlement with CBS were not disclosed. Just before his dismissal, Imus had signed a five-year, $40 million contract with CBS.

The announcement essentially makes Imus a free agent, and broadcast industry experts say he will be back on the air soon enough

Link (http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/am-rutgers0815,0,65864,print.story)

Funny thing is no one outside of the Rutgers campus knows or cares who she is.

crzyjournalist03
08-16-2007, 04:08 PM
wow...he sues Schilling, but not the authors of the book that Schilling read that had all this info...

JasperDog94
08-16-2007, 04:21 PM
Originally posted by crzyjournalist03
wow...he sues Schilling, but not the authors of the book that Schilling read that had all this info... Great point.

Better be careful. If you agree with that book Bonds may sue you too.:doh:

Old Tiger
08-16-2007, 04:23 PM
Originally posted by crzyjournalist03
wow...he sues Schilling, but not the authors of the book that Schilling read that had all this info... I saw on PTI that he is sueing the author of the book. It was one of their errors because they thought he was just sueing Schilling.

crzyjournalist03
08-16-2007, 04:26 PM
Originally posted by Go Blue
I saw on PTI that he is sueing the author of the book. It was one of their errors because they thought he was just sueing Schilling.

well, if that's the case, it's a little better...but if so, he's really playing with fire. The authors will have the burden of proof in the lawsuit, and their only sure-fire defense will be truth...if they bring in the "girl" and she indicts Bonds, and the judge/jury buy it, suddenly, the "rumors" about Bonds become "fact" as determined by a court of law.

Maroon87
08-16-2007, 06:13 PM
Originally posted by Go Blue
This is not as rediculous as this;


Link (http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/am-rutgers0815,0,65864,print.story)

Funny thing is no one outside of the Rutgers campus knows or cares who she is.

http://msn.foxsports.com/cbk/story/7127682

^^Jason Whitlock's take^^