PDA

View Full Version : TxPrepCountry 3A top 20 Pre-Season Rankings



Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 10:49 AM
Here ya go folks
3A Top 20 (http://www.tx.prepcountry.com/?t=12&file=articles/3a_top20.htm)

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 10:49 AM
7. Snyder


Are you kidding me?

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 10:52 AM
Originally posted by Emerson1
7. Snyder


Are you kidding me?

to high? to low? What?

Adidas410s
07-06-2007, 10:52 AM
The only one I disagree with is Andrews. They didnt beat any good teams the entire season. Of their 5 wins...how many actually came against teams with winning records??? Yes they return a lot of players...but they're a lot of players from a bad team that doesnt know how to win.

Adidas410s
07-06-2007, 10:52 AM
One other thought...clean up the dead space between each team if you can. Just a presentation suggestion. ;)

burnet44
07-06-2007, 10:53 AM
PrepCountry.com PreSeason Top 20
Class 5A Class 3A


Class 3A 2006 Record Terry's Take
1. Liberty Hill
13-2( Division II State Champions)
With 13 starters back including FB Doug Allman(1,928 yards last year) a solid bulk of lineman and LB Cody Lattimore, and DE Marlowe Poitier on the defensive side. There is no reason the Panthers cant find someone to step in at QB and make another run at the state title.

2. Liberty Eylau
12-3( Division I State Champions)
Just like Liberty Hill, the Leopards return a lot from last years title team. The big name of course is LaMichael James the all everything running back. Difference is, LE will have a tougher time filling the leadership roll that Middlebrooks leaves at the QB position. But 14 returning starters has this team ready to defend their crown.

3. Giddings
13-1
Brock Fritzhenry the all everything QB/DB is of course back, but the Buffaloes also return 11 other starters including All State LB Alan Dock and seemed poised to take that next step and play for a State Title

4. Celina
15-1
The Bobcats just keep knocking on the door in 3A, and with 11 starters back from last years state finalist team. This year they just might kick the door down.

5. Gilmer
10-1
We all know the hype surrounding last years Buckeyes. Well this year they are flying under the radar so to speak. But with D1 commits RB Justin Johnson( Oklahoma) and OL David Snow(Texas) and 6 other starters back on offense, Gilmer will score a lot again this year. Question remains, will the defense step up.

6. Royse City
11-2
The Bulldogs have quietly become a region II power, and this years edition could be the best. The offense returns 7 starters including the duo of Bert Boudreaux and Richardson Morrison. Oh yea, the defense brings back 8 starters as well. No reason the Bulldogs arent playing for the Region Championship this year and possibly more.

7. Snyder
9-4
The Tigers return a mother lode on offense with 9 returning starters including QB Lance Day and the duo of Will Clay and Chase Arendole at RB. Overall this team MIGHT be better than their semi-finalist team of 2003

8. Robinson
12-3
The Rockets were a gutsy missed 2pt conversion away from being DI Champs last year. This year they lose QB Randy Kitchens, but return 13 starters. They might start slow, but look for the Rockets to take off come play-off time again.

9. Ingleside
12-2
With Josh Coffield back at QB, and 13 other returning starters. The Mustangs should be the top team of region IV this year.

10. Graham
7-6
The Steers are a rising team in the west this year. With Case McCoy back at QB this team could be a team to watch come play-off time

11. Wimberley
12-2
While not as talented as they last two Texans team. The 2007 edition has a trio of LBs that will anchor this team while the offense matures

12. Vernon
9-6
The Lions return 11 starters back from last years State Semi-final team. The strength this year looks to be the secondary with SS Darien Williams and FS Ray Daniels back

13. West Orange Stark
11-1
No the Mustangs are not as loaded as past teams. But some programs rebuild, others reload. Count WOS as a reloader.

14. Kirbyville
8-4
The Wildcats return 14 starters. First order of business for 2007, is to prove they can beat WOS

15. Texarkana Pleasant Grove
4-8
This team has 18 returning starters from last year. The question is can they mature into a force in East Texas this year

16. Abilene Wylie
9-3
They say teams are built from the inside-out. With the bulk of the OL and DL back, the Bulldogs should be set for another nice play-off run. Plus never count out a Hugh Sandifer team

17. Andrews
5-8
Last year the Mustangs started the season 1-5, but finished up with a quarterfinal trip. This year 16 starters are back and are looking to start the season off as well as they finished it.

18. Pleasanton
7-6
18 starters are back for the Eagles including QB Niko Salinas.

19. Prosper
8-3
The Eagles kind of get lost in the shadow of Celina, but the 2007 squad returns 14 starters from last years 8-3 team and look to challenge Celina.

20. Tyler Chapel Hill
6-6
My surprise team as the Bulldogs return 11 starters with 7 of them coming on offense. If the Bulldogs can be consistent, they could be the dark horse of Region II.

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 10:54 AM
Originally posted by Adidas410s
One other thought...clean up the dead space between each team if you can. Just a presentation suggestion. ;)

Well right now our system is not set up for Content articles yet, it is a database system first

We are building the content structure now and when we implement it things will look better for articles and such

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 10:54 AM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
to high? to low? What?
To low, they are definetely top 3

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 10:56 AM
Originally posted by Emerson1
To low, they are definetely top 3

Can they be by the end of season..of course..But IMO right now they are not better than the teams in front of them

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 10:57 AM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
Can they be by the end of season..of course..But IMO right now they are not better than the teams in front of them
You don't know what you're talking about.

kepdawg
07-06-2007, 10:57 AM
Rankings look good.

Presentation looks good.

Good job!

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 10:58 AM
Originally posted by Emerson1
You don't know what you're talking about.

LOL

Snyder_TigerFan
07-06-2007, 10:59 AM
Minor correction....2004 was Snyder's semifinal run.

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 11:00 AM
Originally posted by Snyder_TigerFan
Minor correction....2004 was Snyder's semifinal run.

yea and since I broadcast their game agianst Gilmer u would think I would remember that

burnet44
07-06-2007, 11:10 AM
looking at this


Sep 01 Fri Monahans (1-3A) Lost 7-12 close
Sep 08 Fri Hereford (3-4A) Lost 29-33 beat a 4A
Sep 15 Fri Marlin (22-2A) Lost 14-22 lost to a 2a
Sep 22 Fri Amarillo Palo Duro (3-4A) Won 35-0 PD is terrible
Sep 29 Fri Lubbock Cooper (4-3A) Won 14-0 close
Oct 06 Fri Lubbock Estacado (4-4A) Won 29-12 beat an 0-10
Oct 13 Fri Canyon (5-3A) Won 35-32 close
Oct 27 Fri Midland Greenwood (3-3A)* Won 27-17 close
Nov 03 Fri Lamesa (3-3A)* Won 50-0 Tors are bad
Nov 10 Fri Andrews (3-3A)* Won 20-0 not what they used to be
Nov 17 Fri Brownfield (4-3A) Won 42-12 BF aint good
Nov 24 Fri Monahans (1-3A) Won 21-7 beat after losing
Dec 01 Fri Vernon (6-3A) Lost 20-26 close


there are a lot of teams better
top 3 yeah right
Snyder would not have beat
LE, Celina, LH, Wimberly, Robinson, Palestine, Royce City, Gilmer, Cuero, Giddings, LaVega, Hondo, Brownsboro, West Columbia,
ect
but someone will win region 1

look at the meat grinder in Reg 2 and 3
Snyder is not in any of that class
Snyder won some games
vs fair opponents
nothing like the others faced

but since the state is divided into regions
there will be a team in Reg 1 in the final 4
and think they are top 4 because they are still playing

jason
07-06-2007, 11:13 AM
speaking of snyder - you misspelled mother LOAD, you have lode...

unless you meant to compare them to the metalliferous ore that fills a fissure in a rock formation...

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 11:15 AM
Originally posted by jason
speaking of snyder - you misspelled mother LOAD

No I did not

mother lode
n.
The main vein of ore in a region.
An abundant or rich source:

jason
07-06-2007, 11:17 AM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
No I did not

mother lode
n.
The main vein of ore in a region.
An abundant or rich source: yeah, but that term is referring to rock/ore/etc...lol........so they have one of the best rock sources in the state...guess they can use them to beat their opponents with, thats the only way they're going to win :D

burnet44
07-06-2007, 11:17 AM
means a _____load

Adidas410s
07-06-2007, 11:19 AM
Originally posted by Adidas410s
The only one I disagree with is Andrews. They didnt beat any good teams the entire season. Of their 5 wins...how many actually came against teams with winning records??? Yes they return a lot of players...but they're a lot of players from a bad team that doesnt know how to win.

ttt ;)

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 11:19 AM
Originally posted by jason
yeah, but that term is referring to rock/ore/etc...lol........so they have one of the best rock sources in the state...guess they can use them to beat their opponents with, thats the only way they're going to win :D

LOL...that is funny

Mother Lode also means an abundance of...To hit the Mother Lode

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 11:22 AM
ROFL!! I have NEVER seen "mother lode" spelled any other way!!

Mother Load?? You are cracking me up Jason!!

:kiss:

burnet44
07-06-2007, 11:25 AM
hijacked thread
mod alert

No one will even dispute?
Snyder?

weak as unsweet tea

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 11:26 AM
Guy shut up. You don't have to go on a rant about every single post you don't agree with. No one was even being serious about snyder being good.

It's TXbroadacasters thread, he can talk about whatever he wants.

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 11:27 AM
Originally posted by burnet44
hijacked thread
mod alert

No one will even dispute?
Snyder?

weak as unsweet tea

So...are you complaining??

I have a hard time reading your posts, so I am never really sure what you are saying!

kepdawg
07-06-2007, 11:31 AM
Originally posted by Ranger Mom
So...are you complaining??

I have a hard time reading your posts, so I am never really sure what you are saying!

hard time reading his posts?

that right there is funny!

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 11:32 AM
Originally posted by kepdawg
hard time reading his posts?

that right there is funny!

:confused: :confused:

burnet44
07-06-2007, 11:33 AM
no

I am just giving you a hard time. Im sorry you can't read my post.
I will try to do better for the gods. I would not want to get banned, ROM ed, or banished.

And its not like Forney will win more games than Snyder anyway.


This post has been edited for your protection. Lol

Is that better?

burnet44
07-06-2007, 11:34 AM
Originally posted by kepdawg


hard time reading his posts?

that right there is funny!

Thanks a lot Kep. You didnt pass the TAKS ethier? lol

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 11:34 AM
Originally posted by burnet44
no

I am just giving you a hard time. Im sorry you can't read my post.
I will try to do better for the gods. I would not want to get banned, ROM ed, or banished.

And its not like Forney will win more games than Snyder anyway.


This post has been edited for your protection. Lol

Is that better?

Are you talking to me or Kyle??

What did you have to edit??

I'm so confused!!:crazy1:

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 11:36 AM
Originally posted by Ranger Mom
Are you talking to me or Kyle??

What did you have to edit??

I'm so confused!!:crazy1:
I'm not sure, he is talking to himself know though

kepdawg
07-06-2007, 11:37 AM
Originally posted by Ranger Mom
Are you talking to me or Kyle??

What did you have to edit??

I'm so confused!!:crazy1:

How can you not understand that?

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 11:39 AM
Originally posted by kepdawg
How can you not understand that?
it
s
ki
n
d
a
ha
rd
t
o
r
ea
d
so
met
imes
es
pec
ial
ly
wh
e
n
hi
s
p
os
t
wou
l
d
n
t
ma
ke
sin
ce
if
he
po
st
ed
lik
e
a
nor
ma
l
per
so
n
.

charlesrixey
07-06-2007, 11:40 AM
Originally posted by burnet44
Thanks a lot Kep. You didnt pass the TAKS ethier? lol

kepdawg
07-06-2007, 11:40 AM
Originally posted by Emerson1
it
s
ki
n
d
a
ha
rd
t
o
r
ea
d
so
met
imes
es
pec
ial
ly
wh
e
n
hi
s
p
os
t
wou
l
d
n
t
ma
ke
sin
ce
if
he
po
st
ed
lik
e
a
nor
ma
l
per
so
n
.

See I had no problem reading your post either.

I guess I've just had more practice reading his crazy posts!

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 11:41 AM
Originally posted by kepdawg
How can you not understand that?

He didn't quote anyone....Kyle and I BOTH addressed him, so I wasn't sure WHO he was talking to, or if he was talking to both of us!!

How can YOU not understand??;)

charlesrixey
07-06-2007, 11:41 AM
Originally posted by Emerson1
it
s
ki
n
d
a
ha
rd
t
o
r
ea
d
so
met
imes
es
pec
ial
ly
wh
e
n
hi
s
p
os
t
wou
l
d
n
t
ma
ke
sin
ce
if
he
po
st
ed
lik
e
a
nor
ma
l
per
so
n
.

'SENSE' is spelled wrong!

:)

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 11:41 AM
.

kepdawg
07-06-2007, 11:42 AM
Originally posted by burnet44
Thanks a lot Kep. You didnt pass the TAKS ethier? lol

I'm old enough I had to pass TAAS.

I barely passed the writing part. :(

KTA
07-06-2007, 11:42 AM
10. Graham
7-6
The Steers are a rising team in the west this year. With Case McCoy back at QB this team could be a team to watch come play-off time

This mentions nothing about 9 starters on offense, and 6 on defense returning. Case is good, but definitely NOT the entire team, what about Trevor Sparks? Hes just as big of a name right now as Case is.

kepdawg
07-06-2007, 11:45 AM
Originally posted by Ranger Mom
He didn't quote anyone....Kyle and I BOTH addressed him, so I wasn't sure WHO he was talking to, or if he was talking to both of us!!

How can YOU not understand??;)

You asked if he was complaining. He told you he wasn't and apologized for the fact that you couldn't read his post. He said he would try to do a better job in the future because he doesn't want to get ROM'ed. Then he threw in a shot at Forney. Pretty simple stuff to me.

Adidas410s
07-06-2007, 11:48 AM
Originally posted by Adidas410s
The only one I disagree with is Andrews. They didnt beat any good teams the entire season. Of their 5 wins...how many actually came against teams with winning records??? Yes they return a lot of players...but they're a lot of players from a bad team that doesnt know how to win.
I guess we dont discuss football on here anymore... :rolleyes:

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 11:49 AM
Originally posted by kepdawg
You asked if he was complaining. He told you he wasn't and apologized for the fact that you couldn't read his post. He said he would try to do a better job in the future because he doesn't want to get ROM'ed. Then he threw in a shot at Forney. Pretty simple stuff to me.

The Forney shot was what threw me off....I thought he was talking to me and when I read that, I had to wonder!!

Then the editing comment ..... thank God it's Friday!!:crazy1:

kepdawg
07-06-2007, 11:49 AM
Originally posted by Adidas410s
I guess we dont discuss football on here anymore... :rolleyes:

You should have already known that!

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 11:49 AM
Originally posted by Adidas410s
I guess we dont discuss football on here anymore... :rolleyes:

That is freaking hilarious coming from you!!:nerd:

kepdawg
07-06-2007, 11:51 AM
Originally posted by Ranger Mom
The Forney shot was what threw me off....I thought he was talking to me and when I read that, I had to wonder!!

Then the editing comment ..... thank God it's Friday!!:crazy1:

Oh. I just thought someone with over 20K posts and that is as smart as you would have no problem keeping up. :)

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 11:52 AM
Originally posted by kepdawg
Oh. I just thought someone with over 20K posts and that is as smart as you would have no problem keeping up. :)

I don't have to keep up...that's what I have y'all for!!

:kiss:

Adidas410s
07-06-2007, 01:33 PM
Originally posted by Ranger Mom
That is freaking hilarious coming from you!!:nerd:

Let me know when you DON'T have 20,000 posts talking about things other than football! ;)

Snyder_TigerFan
07-06-2007, 01:35 PM
Originally posted by Adidas410s
I guess we dont discuss football on here anymore... :rolleyes:

Well, I tend to agree with your assessment of Andrews. I believe they will be much improved from last year, but I don't think they are a top 20 team. They got as far as they did in the playoffs by playing weak teams (Levelland and Ft. Stockton). They got pretty well thrashed by the first decent team they met (Canyon).

I tried posting this just before the board went down....it can't handle football talk.:)

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 01:49 PM
IMO after the top 15 you could mix in 20 teams into the last teams for the last 5 spots and each have a case

Greenwood is one who was on the cusp..but I like how many more impact players Tyler Chapel Hill has

I like Van, but they have alot to prove before I can say they are a top 20 team

and it could go on and on

3afan
07-06-2007, 02:37 PM
Originally posted by burnet44
....
And its not like Forney will win more games than Snyder anyway.

....

eh? :confused:

what on God's green (in places) earth does Forney have to do with ANYTHING regarding this thread?

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 02:38 PM
Originally posted by 3afan
eh? :confused:

what on God's green (in places) earth does Forney have to do with ANYTHING regarding this thread?


Well DUH aint it obvious

3afan
07-06-2007, 02:40 PM
no - not to me ..... guess its just 44s way of trying to slam someone ....

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 02:41 PM
He swears burnet is still good or something.

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 02:42 PM
Originally posted by 3afan
no - not to me ..... guess its just 44s way of trying to slam someone ....

I'm glad to know his posts aren't obvious to more than just myself!!:p

burnet44
07-06-2007, 02:43 PM
I said that Snyder will win more games than Forney.
Since Forney is so good and Snyder is too. Right?

3afan
07-06-2007, 02:45 PM
:doh:

burnet44
07-06-2007, 02:58 PM
Originally posted by Ranger Mom
I'm glad to know his posts aren't obvious to more than just myself!!:p

Right. You seem to understand everyone else. Im so sorry Im not understood. Its good not being one of the chosen on here. Thank you.

3afan
07-06-2007, 02:59 PM
double :doh:

Gsquared
07-06-2007, 03:01 PM
Lets all smokem peace pipe

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 03:02 PM
wow..did not know my Rankings of 3A would start a Snyder vs Forney battle HAHAHA

Gsquared
07-06-2007, 03:03 PM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
wow..did not know my Rankings of 3A would start a Snyder vs Forney battle HAHAHA
Dang T, always stirring the pot! :devil:

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 03:05 PM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
wow..did not know my Rankings of 3A would start a Snyder vs Forney battle HAHAHA
I put that battle down a while ago with STR. He isn't allowed talk to me until Snyder gets 400 wins and atleast a .500 winning %

Corn Cob
07-06-2007, 03:07 PM
Most polls are somewhat of a joke. Dave Campbell's 3A rankings certainly were! TxPrep's is no exception! The most ridiculous thing about this poll and Dave Campbell's is having Ingleside and Pleasanton ranked in the top 20! Give me a break! I consider the Coaches Poll to probably be the most accurate, and I don't think either of those teams would make the top 50!

charlesrixey
07-06-2007, 03:07 PM
Originally posted by Emerson1
I put that battle down a while ago with STR. He isn't allowed talk to me until Snyder gets 400 wins and atleast a .500 winning %

LOL!

:clap: :clap:

I like it, em!

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 03:10 PM
Originally posted by Corn Cob
Most polls are somewhat of a joke. Dave Campbell's 3A rankings certainly were! TxPrep's is no exception! The most ridiculous thing about this poll and Dave Campbell's is having Ingleside and Pleasanton ranked in the top 20! Give me a break! I consider the Coaches Poll to probably be the most accurate, and I don't think either of those teams would make the top 50!
Coaches polls are probably least accurate. They go off of history alone.

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 03:11 PM
Originally posted by Corn Cob
Most polls are somewhat of a joke. Dave Campbell's 3A rankings certainly were! TxPrep's is no exception! The most ridiculous thing about this poll and Dave Campbell's is having Ingleside and Pleasanton ranked in the top 20! Give me a break! I consider the Coaches Poll to probably be the most accurate, and I don't think either of those teams would make the top 50!

funny u mention the coaches poll because most of them just vote the name programs

AP Panther Fan
07-06-2007, 03:14 PM
lol....someone's got a corn cob up their ....

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 03:22 PM
Originally posted by burnet44
Right. You seem to understand everyone else. Im so sorry Im not understood. Its good not being one of the chosen on here. Thank you.

Good job!! That was actually written in sentence/paragraph form!

That I understood!!!:) :)

Snydertigersrul
07-06-2007, 03:28 PM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
LOL...that is funny

Mother Lode also means an abundance of...To hit the Mother Lode

what a joke of a poll, Royce City No. 6, they won't even finish in the final Top 10. You also need to get your information straight, Snyder went to the 2004 semifinals, not 2003.:mad:

Ranger Mom
07-06-2007, 03:29 PM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
what a joke of a poll, Royce City No. 6, they won't even finish in the final Top 10. You also need to get your information straight, Snyder went to the 2004 semifinals, not 2003.:mad:

You really should read entirely through a thread before you start that....he already caught his mistake and laughed at himself because of it....since he did announce that game!!

Snydertigersrul
07-06-2007, 03:31 PM
Originally posted by Ranger Mom
You really should read entirely through a thread before you start that....he already caught his mistake and laughed at himself because of it....since he did announce that game!!


Andrews in a Top 20, LOL:D

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 03:31 PM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
what a joke of a poll, Royce City No. 6, they won't even finish in the final Top 10. You also need to get your information straight, Snyder went to the 2004 semifinals, not 2003.:mad:

Yes I know..I BROADCASTED the game, it was just a slip...and please explain why RC wont finish in the top 10?

Snydertigersrul
07-06-2007, 03:32 PM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
Yes I know..I BROADCASTED the game, it was just a slip...and please explain why RC wont finish in the top 10?

They don't have the talent to stay in the Top 10. They will get pounded like they did by Abilene Wylie when they play a real team.

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 03:35 PM
Same can be said for Snyder.

Snyder_TigerFan
07-06-2007, 03:35 PM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
They don't have the talent to stay in the Top 10. They will get pounded like they did by Abilene Wylie when they play a real team.
so http://forums.secondcitizen.com/images/smilies/fullofshit.gif

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 03:36 PM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
They don't have the talent to stay in the Top 10. They will get pounded like they did by Abilene Wylie when they play a real team.

ohh yea cause games from a couple of years ago matter for 2007..thanks I forgot that

Snydertigersrul
07-06-2007, 03:36 PM
Originally posted by Emerson1
Same can be said for Snyder.



How did Forney do in last year's playoffs? Oh, I forget, they didn't make it. Case closed.

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 03:39 PM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
How did Forney do in last year's playoffs? Oh, I forget, they didn't make it. Case closed.
Yay, you made the playoffs in a WEST texas district, and went far in the little girl division. I am sure you think Snyder could actually beat us to lol.

Like I said, get 400 wins and atleast a .500 winning % then come talk.

Snydertigersrul
07-06-2007, 03:40 PM
Originally posted by Emerson1
Yay, you made the playoffs in a WEST texas district, and went far in the little girl division. I am sure you think Snyder could actually beat us to lol.

Like I said, get 400 wins and atleast a .500 winning % then come talk.

Forney has not had a good team since the days of Clay Beason

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 03:43 PM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
Forney has not had a good team since the days of Clay Beason

Your becoming one of my fav posters..ur so out there it is greatness

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 03:43 PM
Wait, what team made it to this game called the state championship in 2000? A game snyder wouldn't know anything about.

Snydertigersrul
07-06-2007, 03:45 PM
Originally posted by Emerson1
Wait, what team made it to this game called the state championship in 2000? A game snyder wouldn't know anything about.


We were 4A in 2000

Emerson1
07-06-2007, 03:49 PM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
We were 4A in 2000
is that supposed to help your case?

charlesrixey
07-06-2007, 04:08 PM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
what a joke of a poll, Royce City No. 6, they won't even finish in the final Top 10. You also need to get your information straight, Snyder went to the 2004 semifinals, not 2003.:mad:


i'd say RC has a better chance to finish in the top 10 than Snyder


or perhaps 92% of us here on the board are wrong

charlesrixey
07-06-2007, 04:10 PM
I'm not even really sure why we are all wasting our time trying to fight this!:confused:

Txbroadcaster
07-06-2007, 04:11 PM
Originally posted by charlesrixey
I'm not even really sure why we are all wasting our time trying to fight this!:confused:

I think it is amusing

3afan
07-06-2007, 04:12 PM
I like my Ibanez ........

Gsquared
07-06-2007, 04:49 PM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
what a joke of a poll, Royce City No. 6, they won't even finish in the final Top 10. You also need to get your information straight, Snyder went to the 2004 semifinals, not 2003.:mad:
If RC gets by LE or Gilmer they will gut Snyder.

charlesrixey
07-06-2007, 05:13 PM
Snyder's Playoff History

Snyder Playoff History (http://http://texashsfootball.com/board/index.php?showtopic=21099)

Record in playoffs since 1997

7-9


Royse City's History (Since 1990)

Royse City History (http://http://texashsfootball.com/board/index.php?showtopic=33026)

Record in Playoffs since 1997

9-6

doesn't seem to be any historically significant difference between the two programs

Both have been to the quarterfinals a couple of times (snyder to the semis) and both return good offensive skill players

I'll take Royse City's QB combo, which is more battle tested after playing within seven of the D1 state champs.

this is all pointless speculation, though, since they probably won't play in the same division

Snyder_TigerFan
07-06-2007, 05:19 PM
Originally posted by charlesrixey
I'm not even really sure why we are all wasting our time trying to fight this!:confused:

Gsquared
07-06-2007, 05:23 PM
Cuz a voice of reason had to step in:cool: Ill get one more look at Snyder when Marlin outsprints em again.

charlesrixey
07-06-2007, 05:27 PM
Originally posted by Gsquared
Cuz a voice of reason had to step in:cool: Ill get one more look at Snyder when Marlin outsprints em again.



I hope you aren't referring to yourself, G!;) :cool:

Gsquared
07-06-2007, 05:28 PM
Originally posted by charlesrixey
I hope you aren't referring to yourself, G!;) :cool:
Im the voice of unreasonable

VWG
07-06-2007, 08:38 PM
Originally posted by KTA
This mentions nothing about 9 starters on offense, and 6 on defense returning. Case is good, but definitely NOT the entire team, what about Trevor Sparks? Hes just as big of a name right now as Case is.


I agree, that Sparks kid can run out of the fullback position.... and he ended up with like 130+ tackles at LB position during regular season. Not to mention they have their entire O-line back.
Vernon will be a tough opponent to deal with in that district, but don't count out the fact that William Miller graduated for the Lions and he was a stud at QB. Damien Miller (no relation) should take over at QB where he hasn't played since he was on the freshman team.

Olddawgfan
07-07-2007, 09:44 AM
Thanks for mentioning that KTA, I totally agree. This syndrone that one player carries the team is silly. With that said, I will bet you by the end of the season, that McCoy looks like the only star on the team? (playcalling is a key)

DaHop72
07-07-2007, 10:04 AM
Originally posted by Gsquared
Cuz a voice of reason had to step in:cool: Ill get one more look at Snyder when Marlin outsprints em again. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Txbroadcaster
07-07-2007, 10:22 AM
Originally posted by Olddawgfan
Thanks for mentioning that KTA, I totally agree. This syndrone that one player carries the team is silly. With that said, I will bet you by the end of the season, that McCoy looks like the only star on the team? (playcalling is a key)


I never said he was the ONLY thing..But when your doing a small synposis you want to name someone everyone across the state will know and That McCoy.

IHStangFan
07-07-2007, 10:31 AM
Ingleside gets Coffield back, but didn't they loose Adams and Joel Johnson? If so, I'll be shocked if the Mustangs are as good as they were last year. On the flip side to that, it always seems that Hesseltine finds a way to win.

Txbroadcaster
07-07-2007, 10:33 AM
Originally posted by IHStangFan
Ingleside gets Coffield back, but didn't they loose Adams and Joel Johnson? If so, I'll be shocked if the Mustangs are as good as they were last year. On the flip side to that, it always seems that Hesseltine finds a way to win.

14 returning starters off a 12-2 team is IMO the experience and talent needed to go far

KTA
07-07-2007, 10:45 AM
Vernon will be a tough opponent to deal with in that district, but don't count out the fact that William Miller graduated for the Lions and he was a stud at QB.

Dont forget they lost Ashton Whiteside (there go to guy)



I will bet you by the end of the season, that McCoy looks like the only star on the team? (playcalling is a key)

I dont think so. Him being the QB, every play is in his hands. Its kinda hard not the be a star (no doubt the kid has talent). Its how the other kids perform thats going to make them stars. I would of agreed with your last statement to an extent if Chance (his brother) was back playing wr, but he aint.


you want to name someone everyone across the state will know and That McCoy.

Only because of his brother

Txbroadcaster
07-07-2007, 10:46 AM
Originally posted by KTA



Only because of his brother [/B]

I wont disagree with that..but the kid put up some good numbers for a freshman QB as well

Ingleside Fan
07-07-2007, 10:49 AM
Originally posted by IHStangFan
Ingleside gets Coffield back, but didn't they loose Adams and Joel Johnson? If so, I'll be shocked if the Mustangs are as good as they were last year. On the flip side to that, it always seems that Hesseltine finds a way to win.

The replacements for Zack and Joel are ready and playing 7 man right now. Coach Hesseltine has some new offesive plans also. This year should be just as exciting as last. More talent has joined the team also. Something new!!!;)

Always BELIEVE!

KTA
07-07-2007, 10:54 AM
I wont disagree with that..but the kid put up some good numbers for a freshman QB as well

Oh no doubt, but I think Sparks is more critical to the team then McCoy is at this point.

Txbroadcaster
07-07-2007, 10:57 AM
Originally posted by KTA
Oh no doubt, but I think Sparks is more critical to the team then McCoy is at this point.

On offense I think that will be a week to week kind of thing. What does the Defense try to take away.

chaingang
07-07-2007, 04:20 PM
WOS is ranked way too low. IMO

IHStangFan
07-07-2007, 06:32 PM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
14 returning starters off a 12-2 team is IMO the experience and talent needed to go far fair enough, but I'm FROM Ingleside and watched them play several times last year and know several of the kids, and I'm telling YOU that the handful that they lost to grad. were the key pieces to the Mustangs' success last year....BUT...as I orig. stated...Coach Hesseltine has a way of "pulling the rabbit out of the hat" time and time again, so I'm sure the Mustangs will be fine.

Ingleside Fan
07-07-2007, 06:49 PM
Coach H has a few new rabbits this year.;)

IHStangFan
07-07-2007, 06:59 PM
Originally posted by Ingleside Fan
Coach H has a few new rabbits this year.;) don't doubt it for a second, the man works miracles! :clap: we've had teams w/ more talent in the past that were 2-8 in the Lamar Lewis days....I'd of loved to see what Coach H could have done w/ those teams.

burnet44
07-07-2007, 09:34 PM
H does a great job
but still someone will win the region
It will not make you number 4 in the state
I hope you didnt lose much
Still its region 4
they just dont have the talent level of 2 and 3
we gutted the d with a lot of basic stuff
and I saw a lot of missed key reads
Ingleside was good
but no where near LE, Palestine, Hutto or even WC
WC looked like Tarzan played like Jane
WC had some great looking kids
Palestines kids looked great and played great to boot

Centextrash
07-07-2007, 11:49 PM
What about Hutto?

I think they will surprise some people!

hutex04
07-08-2007, 12:43 AM
Hutto lost Jeremy Kerley. I dont know what all they have coming back but i think hutto is looking at a 5-5,6-4 kinda record this year fighting for a 3rd place finish in district. Could be wrong tho :D

eagles_victory
07-08-2007, 12:57 AM
the two defending champs as your number 1 and 2 teams dont break that limb you just stepped out on

Txbroadcaster
07-08-2007, 01:23 AM
Originally posted by eagles_victory
the two defending champs as your number 1 and 2 teams dont break that limb you just stepped out on

Funny..Most say the defending champs should be at the top until beaten

I dont follow that, but when looking at the top 5 teams, I cant say any of the other 3 are better than LH and LE going into the season.

And I would say putting LE at #2 when they graduate a QB like Middlebrooks is not taking the easy route.

Who-dun-it!!?
07-08-2007, 01:38 AM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
Can they be by the end of season..of course..But IMO right now they are not better than the teams in front of them

I agree, I'd rather drop them between 15 and 25. I expect a great season, but a top ten ranking is pretty generous.

Who-dun-it!!?
07-08-2007, 01:46 AM
Originally posted by Snydertigersrul
How did Forney do in last year's playoffs? Oh, I forget, they didn't make it. Case closed. :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Who-dun-it!!?
07-08-2007, 01:48 AM
Originally posted by Emerson1
Yay, you made the playoffs in a WEST texas district, and went far in the little girl division. I am sure you think Snyder could actually beat us to lol.

Like I said, get 400 wins and atleast a .500 winning % then come talk.

How many of those wins came before you were born youngster?

Who-dun-it!!?
07-08-2007, 01:50 AM
Originally posted by charlesrixey
Snyder's Playoff History

Snyder Playoff History (http://http://texashsfootball.com/board/index.php?showtopic=21099)

Record in playoffs since 1997

7-9


Royse City's History (Since 1990)

Royse City History (http://http://texashsfootball.com/board/index.php?showtopic=33026)

Record in Playoffs since 1997

9-6

doesn't seem to be any historically significant difference between the two programs

Both have been to the quarterfinals a couple of times (snyder to the semis) and both return good offensive skill players

I'll take Royse City's QB combo, which is more battle tested after playing within seven of the D1 state champs.

this is all pointless speculation, though, since they probably won't play in the same division

Finally some intelligent thought!!!

Txbroadcaster
07-08-2007, 01:51 AM
Originally posted by chaingang
WOS is ranked way too low. IMO

I grappled with where to put WOS..I know they will have the talent, but the lack of returning starters put them lower..But again this is not where I think teams will end up at the end of season, but where I think they are coming into the season

chaingang
07-08-2007, 11:29 AM
Originally posted by Txbroadcaster
I grappled with where to put WOS..I know they will have the talent, but the lack of returning starters put them lower..But again this is not where I think teams will end up at the end of season, but where I think they are coming into the season

Point taken. I can see where losing starters might drop us down. Just remember, I dont think we have EVER had a rebuilding year. My sophomore year, we lost 90% of our starters. The next season with newbies, we ran the table in district and then lost to eventual state champ LaMarque in the Regional finals. I see your logic and I wont argue with you. We will just simply have to prove it.

Txbroadcaster
07-08-2007, 03:53 PM
Originally posted by chaingang
Point taken. I can see where losing starters might drop us down. Just remember, I dont think we have EVER had a rebuilding year. My sophomore year, we lost 90% of our starters. The next season with newbies, we ran the table in district and then lost to eventual state champ LaMarque in the Regional finals. I see your logic and I wont argue with you. We will just simply have to prove it.

That is why I said WOS is not a rebuilder they are reloaders

Old Green
07-08-2007, 04:10 PM
Pleasanton ? All the starters are good, but Pleasanton was suppose to be good last year. I would have put Medina Valley.

Your top 20 looks good though.:thumbsup:

Fish's mom
07-17-2007, 01:36 AM
HEy, everyone, long time no post. Couldn't sleep, I'm actuallly looking forward to this season. Still don't believe in polls but do believe our boys will play with heart. It'll be here before we know it, time to get program ads started, and get the horse shoes painted. I started posting when Josh was a freshman, guess time flies when you're having fun, he's senior now. Would like to see them take the ball a little farther this. Believe they have the potential too, even without key players, remembers that's how key players are made they play;)

Take care
Good Luck to all the teams and no injuries this year, let's go for a state record(no injuries) boy am I dreaming? Guess better try to get some more sleep.

:wave:

BILLYFRED0000
07-17-2007, 10:39 PM
Just for fun I love the number of starters that coach ford put up.
REal numbers are closer to 15 coming back but you did not hear that from me......