PDA

View Full Version : A sad situation looks to get even worse...



Maroon87
05-24-2007, 02:42 PM
Suit claims restaurant kept giving intoxicated pitcher drinks
Associated Press


ST. LOUIS -- The father of Josh Hancock filed suit Thursday, claiming a restaurant provided drinks to the St. Louis Cardinals relief pitcher even though he was intoxicated prior to the crash that killed him.

The suit, filed in St. Louis Circuit Court by Dean Hancock of Tupelo, Miss., does not specify damages. Mike Shannon's Restaurant, owned by the longtime Cardinals broadcaster who starred on three World Series teams in the 1960s, is a defendant in the case along with Shannon's daughter, Patricia Shannon Van Matre, the restaurant manager.

Other defendants include Eddie's Towing, the company whose flatbed tow truck was struck by Hancock's sport utility vehicle in the early hours of April 29; tow truck driver Jacob Edward Hargrove; and Justin Tolar, the driver whose stalled car on Interstate 64 was being assisted by Hargrove.

The Cardinals and Major League Baseball were not listed as defendants.

Authorities said the 29-year pitcher had a blood alcohol content of nearly twice the legal limit when he crashed into the back of the tow truck. He was also speeding and using a cell phone and wasn't wearing a seat belt, police chief Joe Mokwa said after the accident. Marijuana was also found in the SUV.

Mokwa said Hancock went to Mike Shannon's not long after the Cardinals played a day game against the Chicago Cubs on April 28. The lawsuit claimed that Hancock was a regular at the restaurant bar and was there for more than 3½ hours.

"It's understood that for the entire 3½ hours that Josh Hancock was there that he was handed drinks," Keith Kantack, a lawyer for Dean Hancock, said. "It's our understanding that from the moment Josh Hancock entered Mike Shannon's that night that he was never without a drink."

A person answering phones at the restaurant declined comment. A message left with Van Matre was not returned.

The lawsuit claimed Tolar was negligent in allowing the vehicle to reach the point where it stalled on the highway and for failing to move it out of the way of oncoming traffic.

Hargrove parked the tow truck behind the stalled car, and police said he arrived there moments before the truck was struck by Hancock's SUV. Kantack said the tow truck may have been there up to 15 minutes, yet failed to get the stalled vehicle out of the way.

"Were the police contacted?" Kantack asked. "Why weren't flares put out? Why was the tow truck there for an exorbitant amount of time?"

Tolar did not have a listed telephone number. Calls to the towing company were met with a busy signal.

Kantack said others could be added later as defendants in the suit. He declined to speculate on whether the Cardinals or Major League Baseball could be added to the suit but said the Hancock family has been "overwhelmed by the support and respect the Cardinals have shown since Josh's passing."

Dean Hancock said in a statement that the "facts and circumstances" of Josh's death "have caused great pain to all of Josh's family." As administrator of his son's estate, Dean Hancock said he has an obligation to represent the family on all issues, "including any legal actions necessary against those who contributed to the untimely and unnecessary death."

Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press

Rabbit'93
05-24-2007, 02:47 PM
My .02

Why is he (father) suing the towing company and driver of the stalled vehicle? To me that seems going too far.

As far as the bar I believe both the restaraunt and patron to be at fault. The bar-keep should know that Hancock was too drunk to drive. Also Hancock should have known when to say when.

A sad story but we all have to be accountable for our own actions.

Snyder_TigerFan
05-24-2007, 02:49 PM
Don't they know that they can't get any money out of the restraunt?! They need to go after the manufacturer of the alcohol....it's really their fault. They could get big bucks that way. :rolleyes:

Always looking to place blame somewhere else.

44INAROW
05-24-2007, 02:52 PM
it's always someone else's fault - that's one of the problems in this world -

Maroon87
05-24-2007, 02:53 PM
Originally posted by Snyder_TigerFan
Don't they know that they can't get any money out of the restraunt?! They need to go after the manufacturer of the alcohol....it's really their fault. They could get big bucks that way. :rolleyes:

Always looking to place blame somewhere else.

Interesting thought: If Hancock was drinking Budweiser, then a suit vs. them would in effect be a suit vs. the Cardinals, since Anheuser-Busch owns the team. And notice the team is not a defendant.:thinking:

Heck, it's already incestuous enough that Mike Shannon is involved.

LH Panther Mom
05-24-2007, 02:54 PM
Originally posted by Rabbit'93
Why is he (father) suing the towing company and driver of the stalled vehicle? To me that seems going too far.


Exactly!!!! How dare someone have their vehicle break down! :rolleyes:

DDBooger
05-24-2007, 02:55 PM
Originally posted by Maroon87
Interesting thought: If Hancock was drinking Budweiser, then a suit vs. them would in effect be a suit vs. the Cardinals, since Anheuser-Busch owns the team. And notice the team is not a defendant.:thinking:

Heck, it's already incestuous enough that Mike Shannon is involved. :eek: you said incestuous:eek:

LH Panther Mom
05-24-2007, 02:56 PM
Originally posted by Maroon87
Interesting thought: If Hancock was drinking Budweiser, then a suit vs. them would in effect be a suit vs. the Cardinals, since Anheuser-Busch owns the team. And notice the team is not a defendant.:thinking:

Heck, it's already incestuous enough that Mike Shannon is involved.
And to add to that....do I remember correctly that he STARTED drinking in the players' lounge?

Maroon87
05-24-2007, 02:58 PM
Originally posted by DDBooger
:eek: you said incestuous:eek:

I'm concerned that I knew exactly how to spell it...:confused:

DDBooger
05-24-2007, 02:59 PM
Originally posted by Maroon87
I'm concerned that I knew exactly how to spell it...:confused: until this passes over can you change your cat to red and blue?:confused: lmao j/k:p :cool:

44INAROW
05-24-2007, 03:00 PM
Originally posted by LH Panther Mom
And to add to that....do I remember correctly that he STARTED drinking in the players' lounge?

I need to quit reading this thread - my blood pressure has risen about 10 points........... these kind of lawsuits are a slap in the face to REAL INJURED parties who have legitimate causes of action against other parties.

DDBooger
05-24-2007, 03:02 PM
Originally posted by 44INAROW
I need to quit reading this thread - my blood pressure has risen about 10 points........... these kind of lawsuits are a slap in the face to REAL INJURED parties who have legitimate causes of action against other parties. agreed, i worked for a law firm doing investigation and research and some of the cases just baffled me, yet the lawyers wanted to go through with them. it gives those who truely are injured due to someone else's negligence or at worst GROSS negligence a bad name.

Adidas410s
05-24-2007, 03:02 PM
The dad is trying to deflect attention away from his son and onto others...but in reality he's just keeping his son in the limelight for drunk driving.

Maroon87
05-24-2007, 03:02 PM
Originally posted by DDBooger
until this passes over can you change your cat to red and blue?:confused: lmao j/k:p :cool:

Oh dude....WAAAAAYYYY below the belt.:mad: :p

Johnny Utah
05-24-2007, 03:16 PM
i agree 44, ridiculous, a grieving parent for sure. Son was at fault for being drunk, period, and driving drunk, period.