What happened to global warming thread?

[JasperDog94]

:confused: :confused: :confused:

[Black_Magic]

Its not real. so it never existed.:clap:

[pirate4state]

beats me

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by pirate4state
beats me (cue X-Files music)

[piratebg]

Let the conspiracy theories being :nerd:

[Reds fan]

It fell into a hole of dark matter????

[Gobbla2001]

the thread was made out of ice... so it melted...

[JasperDog94]

I was hoping Keith would reconsider and actually respond to evidence contrary to his theory.

[Black_Magic]

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
the thread was made out of ice... so it melted...
Thats Right!! It melted away just above Siberia.
http://www.keepwintercool.org/images/nrdc_earth_small.jpg

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by Black_Magic
Thats Right!! It melted away just above Siberia.
http://www.keepwintercool.org/images/nrdc_earth_small.jpg

Where is that place (with all the ships that kill seals) where all the ships are stranded in the ice that froze around them at??

[pirate4state]

If it was deleted and/or moved - it was done so for a reason. Haven't there already been one or two other threads on this subject closed and/or moved? Haven't ya'll figured it out yet. :doh:

[BTEXDAD]

Originally posted by Black_Magic
Thats Right!! It melted away just above Siberia.
http://www.keepwintercool.org/images/nrdc_earth_small.jpg


My little niece was coloring this picture last weekend.

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by pirate4state
If it was deleted and/or moved - it was done so for a reason. Haven't there already been one or two other threads on this subject closed and/or moved? Haven't ya'll figured it out yet. :doh: I'm just curious as to why it was removed. Typically there's a warning and the thread gets locked.

[Keith7]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
I was hoping Keith would reconsider and actually respond to evidence contrary to his theory.

I already told you I wasn't going to argue with people who just copy and paste info off of conservative websites, thats pointless.. I'm not going to change the views of those websites so what is the point?? I've spent way too much time argueing the point to people who don't really care to learn more about the issue.. if you want to read all my responses to global warming, I'm willing to bet you can find something worth while on the thread below

http://bbs.3adownlow.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=61031

[Gobbla2001]

the global warming stuff is coming from liberal websites... the anti-global warming is coming from conservative sites...

just an observation... not saying who's right or wrong, I'm neither, I'm just me... don't need sides to pick my opinions for me...

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by Keith7
I already told you I wasn't going to argue with people who just copy and paste info off of conservative websites, thats pointless.. I'm not going to change the views of those websites so what is the point?? I've spent way too much time argueing the point to people who don't really care to learn more about the issue.. if you want to read all my responses to global warming, I'm willing to bet you can find something worth while on the thread below

http://bbs.3adownlow.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=61031 Conservative websites you say? I'm sorry, I didn't realize that any info by scientists that disagree with your theory are now labeled "conservative".:rolleyes:

[Keith7]

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
the global warming stuff is coming from liberal websites...

thats necisarrily true, most of the global warming info I was putting on the missing thread was out of my climatology textbook

[Gobbla2001]

This can be a very educated discussion if we remain civil and take our fingers off the trigger...

here's a good question, we may learn something here...

To the pro-global warming people who post on the downlow:

After reading and listening about global warmings reasons and solutions, what new practices have you picked up in order to slow down/stop global warming? And what do you feel can help pursuade conservatives and/or non-believers to do the same and to better understand the issue (besides Al Gore, not saying he's not right, just saying most conservatives do not take the man seriously, he was on South Park, and don't throw out the "if they'd get their head out of their asses" type sayings... if you take this issue VERY seriously, you'll be serious about getting others on the same boat, not bashing... same goes for the conservatives, chill out, I have not seen any "show-stopper" arguements by either side, here on the downlow or on the national stage)...

[Keith7]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Conservative websites you say? I'm sorry, I didn't realize that any info by scientists that disagree with your theory are now labeled "conservative".:rolleyes:

look at the info on the pages you guys were copy and pasting .. and then look who these "scientist" were and who funded these guys...... conservatives..

and besides that is not the point.. Like I said i'm not arguing with "ctrl+v"

[Gobbla2001]

Originally posted by Keith7
look at the info on the pages you guys were copy and pasting .. and then look who these "scientist" were and who funded these guys...... conservatives..



not pickin' on you, just saying that is a very strong claim... where's the back-up to that claim?

most of the pro-global warming sites/literature are funded by Al Gore<<<~~~~~ easy to type, not easy to prove (and I doubt it's true, just saying, prove it)

[Keith7]

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
not pickin' on you, just saying that is a very strong claim... where's the back-up to that claim?

most of the pro-global warming sites/literature are funded by Al Gore<<<~~~~~ easy to type, not easy to prove (and I doubt it's true, just saying, prove it)

one of my Text books on Amazon.com (http://www.amazon.com/Climates-Hunger-Reid-Bryson/dp/0299073742/ref=sr_1_1/104-6174360-6747101?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1177522288&sr=8-1)

This wasn't funded by Al Gore.. In fact it was originally published in 1979

[Gobbla2001]

1979... good point

today por favor?

[Keith7]

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
1979... good point

today por favor?

I'm not down for a 1 vs. 37 arguement today.. maybe tomorrow i'll be more in the mood

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by Keith7
look at the info on the pages you guys were copy and pasting .. and then look who these "scientist" were and who funded these guys...... conservatives..

and besides that is not the point.. Like I said i'm not arguing with "ctrl+v" Okay, I'll type the info myself.

As per "The Scientific American":

120,000 years ago the co2 levels were the same as today, yet the global temperatures were colder.

Explain that.

[Gobbla2001]

Originally posted by Keith7
I'm not down for a 1 vs. 37 arguement today.. maybe tomorrow i'll be more in the mood

I'm being serious keith... I'm not on either side of this issue because I believe the sides are politically devided... I like the information and I want it...

I'm just saying, most of the anti-global warming guys are posting opinions and research from today as well as the pro's, just think a book published in 1979 is not supporting your arguement for the scientists of today being backed by conservatives...

common sense, isn't it?

[Gobbla2001]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Okay, I'll type the info myself.

As per "The Scientific American":

120,000 years ago the co2 levels were the same as today, yet the global temperatures were colder.

Explain that.

what is the scientific american?

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
what is the scientific american? It's a general scientific magazine that prints a myriad of articles.

http://www.sciam.com/

[Keith7]

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
I'm being serious keith... I'm not on either side of this issue because I believe the sides are politically devided... I like the information and I want it...

I'm just saying, most of the anti-global warming guys are posting opinions and research from today as well as the pro's, just think a book published in 1979 is not supporting your arguement for the scientists of today being backed by conservatives...

common sense, isn't it?

The point of my telling you guys that one of my climatology books was published in 1979, is proof that his has been known for years, and that this wasn't something just made up by liberals to scare people into voting..

and to Jasper, according to the EPA the tempurature has always risen and fallen with the change of co2 levels.. this is common sense.. jsut look at Venus, it has a high level of co2 and thus is the hottest planet in the atmosphere

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/pastcc.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/images/co2-temp.gif

[Gobbla2001]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
It's a general scientific magazine that prints a myriad of articles.

http://www.sciam.com/

I can't find the information you mentioned above...

[JasperDog94]

Gobbla,

I believe that the earth is warming. I just don't think we know "why" it is warming. That same research by the Scientific American stated that the oceans had a dramatic flux 120,000 years ago. First there was a 20 foot increase followed by a 50 foot decrease!!! All in a matter of 100 years. This occurred naturally.

Something tells me that this wasn't due to co2 levels.

[Gobbla2001]

Originally posted by Keith7
The point of my telling you guys that one of my climatology books was published in 1979, is proof that his has been known for years, and that this wasn't something just made up by liberals to scare people into voting..

[/url]

I undestand that, Keith, but there were guys saying the opposite back in the day as well... I want something besides theory...

right now we have scientific information saying that we are causing global warming and scientific information saying we're not...

personally I do not see how anyone can believe anything...

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by Keith7
The point of my telling you guys that one of my climatology books was published in 1979, is proof that his has been known for years, and that this wasn't something just made up by liberals to scare people into voting..

and to Jasper, according to the EPA the tempurature has always risen and fallen with the change of co2 levels.. this is common sense.. jsut look at Venus, it has a high level of co2 and thus is the hottest planet in the atmosphere

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/pastcc.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/images/co2-temp.gif Do co2 levels increase because of the temperature or cause the temperature to change?

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
I can't find the information you mentioned above... August of 1995

[Gobbla2001]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Gobbla,

I believe that the earth is warming. I just don't think we know "why" it is warming. That same research by the Scientific American stated that the oceans had a dramatic flux 120,000 years ago. First there was a 20 foot increase followed by a 50 foot decrease!!! All in a matter of 100 years. This occurred naturally.

Something tells me that this wasn't due to co2 levels.

that's the thing, I can believe the earth is warming as well... but it did 500 years ago too... and as I've said many a time on here, we had an ice age end in Europe in the mid 1800's... that is very strong information for that side...

[Keith7]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Do co2 levels increase because of the temperature or cause the temperature to change?

co2 causes tempurature change, thats why it is a green house gas.. now if warmer tempurature created more co2 then we would all be in trouble because that would mean a domino effect of green house gasses that would really heat up the earth

[Gobbla2001]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
August of 1995

oh, okay...

anyone know what today's levels are compared to those of 120k years ago?

[Keith7]

Originally posted by Gobbla2001
oh, okay...

anyone know what today's levels are compared to those of 120k years ago?

as prepared by Dr. Robert Rohde of Cal-Berkley

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1c/Carbon_Dioxide_400kyr.png

[Gobbla2001]

it did go up quite a bit there...

[Keith7]

anyways i'm getting out of this before I get ganged up on by 30 people..

[Gobbla2001]

Originally posted by Keith7
anyways i'm getting out of this before I get ganged up on by 30 people..

as long as they're wearing ru....

wait whoa nm wrong subject

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by Keith7
co2 causes tempurature change, thats why it is a green house gas.. now if warmer tempurature created more co2 then we would all be in trouble because that would mean a domino effect of green house gasses that would really heat up the earth Then why have ice samples taken shown that global temperatures preceeded the rise in co2 by hundreds of years?

[Black_Magic]

Originally posted by Keith7

and to Jasper, according to the EPA the tempurature has always risen and fallen with the change of co2 levels.. this is common sense.. jsut look at Venus, it has a high level of co2 and thus is the hottest planet in the atmosphere

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/pastcc.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/images/co2-temp.gif You are not using your air very wisely... Its a waist of O2....:rolleyes:

[Black_Magic]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Then why have ice samples taken shown that global temperatures preceeded the rise in co2 by hundreds of years? Lets see this info you keep refering to. I gota see this data..

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
I'm just curious as to why it was removed. Typically there's a warning and the thread gets locked. Well, I hadn't even bothered reading it so I don't know. You guys want to go round & round on the subject that is your business as long as no rules are being broken.

[Gobbla2001]

I think the increased sighting of Sasquatch in North America may be related to global warming... obviously if there's that many more, there must be a lotta fartin' goin' on...

[CHS_CG]

Good Lord.. It is Administrative Profeesionals day so yall stop annoying the hell outta p4s and the rest of us admin professionals!

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by Black_Magic
Lets see this info you keep refering to. I gota see this data.. Here you go.

Link (http://icebubbles.ucsd.edu/Publications/CaillonTermIII.pdf)

[shankbear]

It is cyclical....nothing more. Panic causes more disasters than greenhouse gases.

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
Good Lord.. It is Administrative Profeesionals day so yall stop annoying the hell outta p4s and the rest of us admin professionals!

I don't know why....but "Profeesionals" just cracked me up!!:D

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
Good Lord.. It is Administrative Professionals day so yall stop annoying the hell outta p4s and the rest of us admin professionals!

better? lol

[Gobbla2001]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
better? lol

yah I guess you're more professional now...

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
better? lol

Well...it's not so funny anymore!:p

[pirate4state]

It is if you look at your comment and then say it with a real southern drawl :D

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by pirate4state
It is if you look at your comment and then say it with a real southern drawl :D

The things we do to amuse ourselves!!:D

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
Well...it's not so funny anymore!:p


http://www.humoronline.com/funny-baby-pictures-13.jpg

but ritas hair yesterday is still funny

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
http://www.humoronline.com/funny-baby-pictures-13.jpg

but ritas hair yesterday is still funny

OMG I know!!!! You know, my hair still kinda feels nappy. I know I washed it this morning. Hell, I washed it last night. I think maybe I just need a haircut.

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by pirate4state
I think maybe I just need a haircut.

You have been saying that for months!!:hand:

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
You have been saying that for months!!:hand: I know, but I needed it to grow a little bit more. I donate my hair to Locks of Love!! :hand: I think I have just enough for everyone now. :)

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by pirate4state
OMG I know!!!! You know, my hair still kinda feels nappy. I know I washed it this morning. Hell, I washed it last night. I think maybe I just need a haircut.


well atleast you have power at yourhouse... that stupid storm knocked ours out.. i will be goin to a friends today if i dont have power when i come home.. hell i might have to go to my ex boyfriends house.. i still have all my stuff over there ROFLMAO!

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by pirate4state
I know, but I needed it to grow a little bit more. I donate my hair to Locks of Love!! :hand: I think I have just enough for everyone now. :)

I cant do that.. i have colored and permed my hair b4

[sahen]

Just reading in seeing if there is anything about Dark Matter or Dark Energy or whatever that was yesterday.....i guess i'll remain quite for now...

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
I cant do that.. i have colored and permed my hair b4 I think you can. Check out the guidelines HERE (http://www.locksoflove.org/donate.html)

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by sahen
Just reading in seeing if there is anything about Dark Matter or Dark Energy or whatever that was yesterday.....i guess i'll remain quite for now...

Sorry....we kind of hi-jacked this thread talking about "profeesionals" and hair!:p

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
Sorry....we kind of hi-jacked this thread talking about "profeesionals" and hair!:p We noticed. I thought that was the point.:p

[sahen]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
Sorry....we kind of hi-jacked this thread talking about "profeesionals" and hair!:p

its ok...the global warming thread yesterday was pretty much took off on a tangent by me trying to understand the dark energy stuff and some weird physics things....

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
We noticed. I thought that was the point.:p

i hi-jacked it on purpose.. ya know why bc yall are annoying rita and this is our day so shut up!

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
We noticed. I thought that was the point.:p

It really wasn't.......it just happens that way sometimes when me, P4S and CHS_CG are involved!!:p

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
i hi-jacked it on purpose.. ya know why bc yall are annoying rita and this is our day so shut up!

You didn't hi-jack...I did....you just complained!!:tongue: :tongue: :D

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
i hi-jacked it on purpose.. ya know why bc yall are annoying rita and this is our day so shut up! How am I annoying Rita?:confused: :bigcry: :bigcry: :bigcry:

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
You didn't hi-jack...I did....you just complained!!:tongue: :tongue: :D


hahaha... i wasnt complaining.. but rita and i were trying to carry a convo and with her being annoyed it was difficult so i said something... (not that im always outspoken:D )

[LH Panther Mom]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
How am I annoying Rita?:confused: :bigcry: :bigcry: :bigcry: I think she meant to say "I" instead of "you". ;) J/K T!

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
How am I annoying Rita?:confused: :bigcry: :bigcry: :bigcry: You aren't. The global warming stuff is annoying. Talena, as usual, just has to put her 2 cents in everywhere. :D

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by pirate4state
You aren't. The global warming stuff is annoying. Talena, as usual, just has to put her 2 cents in everywhere. :D

How dare her try to take credit for my hi-jack!!

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
How dare her try to take credit for my hi-jack!! I know, right?

AND JD if you were annoying me I hope you know that I would go directly to YOU with my issues. :thumbsup:

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
How dare her try to take credit for my hi-jack!!


HEY it was a group effort!

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by pirate4state
I know, right?

AND JD if you were annoying me I hope you know that I would go directly to YOU with my issues. :thumbsup:

You don't have "issues"...you have a year's subscription!!!:D :D


Sorry...I read that in the "Reader's Digest" this morning and it gave me a chuckle!!:p

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
You don't have "issues"...you have a year's subscription!!!:D :D


Sorry...I read that in the "Reader's Digest" this morning and it gave me a chuckle!!:p

I've always liked "you have so many issues you need a rack to hold them all" :devil: :D wait..........

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by pirate4state
I've always liked "you have so many issues you need a rack to hold them all" :devil: :D wait..........

LOL!! That's a good one too!!

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
How am I annoying Rita?:confused: :bigcry: :bigcry: :bigcry:


WELL



you DID start the thread!

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by pirate4state
I know, right?

AND JD if you were annoying me I hope you know that I would go directly to YOU with my issues. :thumbsup: Great. Just what I need. Another woman with issues...:eek: :eek: :helpme: :helpme: :helpme: :helpme:

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Great. Just what I need. Another woman with issues...:eek: :eek: :helpme: :helpme: :helpme: :helpme: I don't have issues with you, yet. ;)

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by pirate4state
I don't have issues with you, yet. ;)

yet lol.. i love it

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by Keith7
co2 causes tempurature change, thats why it is a green house gas.. now if warmer tempurature created more co2 then we would all be in trouble because that would mean a domino effect of green house gasses that would really heat up the earth

Now you are really demonstrating your ignorance.ST. PETERSBURG, January 15 (RIA Novosti) - Rising levels of carbon dioxide and other gases emitted through human activities, believed by scientists to trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere, are an effect rather than the cause of global warming, a prominent Russian scientist said Monday.

Habibullo Abdusamatov, head of the space research laboratory at the St. Petersburg-based Pulkovo Observatory, said global warming stems from an increase in the sun's activity. His view contradicts the international scientific consensus that climate change is attributable to the emission of greenhouse gases generated by industrial activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation.

"Global warming results not from the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but from an unusually high level of solar radiation and a lengthy - almost throughout the last century - growth in its intensity," Abdusamatov told RIA Novosti in an interview.

"It is no secret that when they go up, temperatures in the world's oceans trigger the emission of large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. So the common view that man's industrial activity is a deciding factor in global warming has emerged from a misinterpretation of cause and effect relations."

next quote.
You should realize that the carbon dioxide only absorbs the infrared radiation at certain frequencies, and it can only absorb the maximum of 100% of the radiation at these frequencies. By this comment, I want to point out that the "forcing" - the expected additive shift of the terrestrial equilibrium temperature - is not a linear function of the carbon dioxide concentration. Instead, the additional greenhouse effect becomes increasingly unimportant as the concentration increases: the expected temperature increase for a single frequency is something like

1.5 ( 1 - exp[-(concentration-280)/200 ppm] ) Celsius
The decreasing exponential tells you how much radiation at the critical frequencies is able to penetrate through the carbon dioxide and leave the planet. The numbers in the formula above are not completely accurate and the precise exponential form is not quite robust either but the qualitative message is reliable. When the concentration increases, additional CO2 becomes less and less important.

Just explain why these Scientists say you are a fool and prove it.

[pirate4state]

Okay - Billfred didn't get the memo ---- :doh: :doh:

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by pirate4state
Okay - Billfred didn't get the memo ---- :doh: :doh:


appently not ROFLMAO!

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by pirate4state
Okay - Billfred didn't get the memo ---- :doh: :doh:

I wonder if that's one of those ctl-v things??

Keith is NOT going to be happy!!

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
appently not ROFLMAO!

I never get the memo. What memo? I did not even get the memo
mentioning the memo.

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
I wonder if that's one of those ctl-v things??

Keith is NOT going to be happy!!

SCREAM!!!!!!!!!!!! :clap: :clap: hee hee hee :evillol:

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by pirate4state
Okay - Billfred didn't get the memo ---- :doh: :doh: Oh, he got the memo all right. He just does what most of us men do...ignore it.:D :D :D

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Oh, he got the memo all right. He just does what most of us men do...ignore it.:D :D :D

typical!!:rolleyes:

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Oh, he got the memo all right. He just does what most of us men do...ignore it.:D :D :D What usually happens AFTER you ignore it :thinking:

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
I wonder if that's one of those ctl-v things??

Keith is NOT going to be happy!! Nope, because according to Keith you need to do your own research and not listen to other experts that have data to the contrary of his theory.

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by pirate4state
What usually happens AFTER you ignore it :thinking: Your honor, my client is going to plead the 5th.

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Your honor, my client is going to plead the 5th.


smart choice

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
I wonder if that's one of those ctl-v things??

Keith is NOT going to be happy!!

Ok what memo. Poor Keith does not understand the intent.
All I am saying is that there is disagreement. All he is saying is that is a fact. Which of course is sheer lunacy based on all the data so far derived.

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
Nope, because according to Keith you need to do your own research and not listen to other experts that have data to the contrary of his theory.

But of course. This is my research bolstered by the science to back it up. Naturally.......

[pirate4state]

billy you need to post more....everytime i see your signature i laugh and laugh :thumbsup: but not about global warming :D :p

[CHS_CG]

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/p4s90/talena_crzy.jpg


do these jeans make my butt look big?:confused:

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/89/254548509_e5276b00b1.jpg?v=0


do these jeans make my butt look big?:confused:

It makes the dog look small!!

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/89/254548509_e5276b00b1.jpg?v=0


do these jeans make my butt look big?:confused: grrrrrrrrrrr....we've got a new web filter. I can't see half the stuff that I used to...maybe that's a good thing.;)

[LH Panther Mom]

Originally posted by JasperDog94
.maybe that's a good thing.;) In this case, it might be. :eek: :eek: :eek: :D

[BILLYFRED0000]

or not. I think she just wanted to butt in......

[injuredinmelee]

Originally posted by Black_Magic
Thats Right!! It melted away just above Siberia.
http://www.keepwintercool.org/images/nrdc_earth_small.jpg

Good we have more land to build on now. I can see room for a golf course, shopping mall, and at least two oil refineries.

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by injuredinmelee
Good we have more land to build on now. I can see room for a golf course, shopping mall, and at least two oil refineries.

Of course get him to pull this one up of 18000 years ago.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/slides/slideset/11/11_177_bslide.html

Dang it won't transfer. It is a good pic I am sure of it.

here is the link.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/slides/slideset/11/11_177_bslide.html

You know, we really need to get those guys who melted all that ice. I would really like to know if it was little green men driving suv's that caused it to melt.

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by injuredinmelee
Good we have more land to build on now. I can see room for a golf course, shopping mall, and at least two oil refineries.

Oh, and if you calculate out the percentage of the ice melt since the last ice age, it is less than .1 percent of the total coverage.
Not much really.

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by BILLYFRED0000
Oh, and if you calculate out the percentage of the ice melt since the last ice age, it is less than .1 percent of the total coverage.
Not much really.

Keith where are you?????

[BILLYFRED0000]

Oh well.

[JasperDog94]

Originally posted by BILLYFRED0000
Keith where are you????? He doesn't want to get "ganged up on".

Of course it has nothing to do with the fact that his theory won't stand up against other facts....not that he would acknowledge them anyway.

[shankbear]

Can't take the heat? Got out of the kitchen? Big debate. Too cyclical to put a finger on.