Did anyone see the USC cheerleader with no pannies?

[Funk-d-fied]

It was awesome!

[Adidas410s]

:eek: :eek: :eek:

[Funk-d-fied]

I would post the funny pic but don't wanna get in trouble.... It was brief but she doesnt like pannies I guess...

[mwynn05]

Originally posted by Funk-d-fied
I would post the funny pic but don't wanna get in trouble.... It was brief but she doesnt like pannies I guess... lol is this a joke?

[lepfan]

You are talking about panTies...aren't you? Maybe she forgot them or maybe she was wearing some that just got lost in all that jumping. :) ;)

[Adidas410s]

I sure hope it wasn't Phil's girl...:(

[Funk-d-fied]

no, she has nothing on, no pannies, thong, g-string, sports shorts..... nothing...

[Ray_BearKat]

I thought I saw that when one of them turned real fast and her skirt flipped up and showed bare cheeks...i thought i was just seeing things though since it was so quick.

[Emerson1]

.

[Emerson1]

Sorry to spoil your fantasy

http://img387.imageshack.us/img387/8243/uscsonggirlhdxf5.jpg

[Funk-d-fied]

fantasy? I don't know about all of that....

[Phil C]

Originally posted by Adidas410s
I sure hope it wasn't Phil's girl...:(

:(

[Phil C]

Originally posted by Funk-d-fied
no, she has nothing on, no pannies, thong, g-string, sports shorts..... nothing...

Funk why not? :eek:

[Phil C]

Originally posted by Adidas410s
I sure hope it wasn't Phil's girl...:(

I don't think it was Ad. Whew! I am so shocked though. :(

[Phil C]

Funk what I mean is why didn't she wear something? They know they jump around and dance around. Why risk being exposed?

[ASUFrisbeeStud]

Originally posted by Emerson1
Sorry to spoil your fantasy

http://img387.imageshack.us/img387/8243/uscsonggirlhdxf5.jpg


Nothin wrong with that. ;) :clap:

[LH Panther Mom]

Originally posted by ASUFrisbeeStud
Nothin wrong with that. ;) :clap:
Looks pretty darn uncomfortable to me. :doh:

[ASUFrisbeeStud]

Uncomfortable maybe, completely hott yes!

[Phil C]

IT'S DISGRACEFUL!!

:mad: :mad: :mad:

[Adidas410s]

Originally posted by Phil C
IT'S DISGRACEFUL!!

:mad: :mad: :mad:

it is what it is...

[CHS_CG]

Originally posted by Phil C
Funk what I mean is why didn't she wear something? They know they jump around and dance around. Why risk being exposed?


probably bc they are hoes!

[Adidas410s]

Originally posted by CHS_CG
probably bc they are hoes!
They are classy ladies...they just make mistakes! :rolleyes:

[crzyjournalist03]

Originally posted by ASUFrisbeeStud
Uncomfortable maybe, completely hott yes!

Since when are wedgies hot? It's not like she's in any kind of sexy underwear there...those are normal panties! That's not sexy...that's something that happens to nerds in seventh grade.

[ASUFrisbeeStud]

I think it's difficult to say what kind of panties she is wearing from this picture, in my mind they are sexy but also disgraceful .:p

[Pudlugger]

I saw it too. It was so fast I wasn't sure but I said did you see that? That girl had no panties on! My son and his lady friend just gave me a puzzled look so I just finished my glass of wine and forgot about it 'till now.:D

[g$$]

Did she forget her tights or bloomers? Who only wears underwear underneath a cheerleading uniform? Wow, weird deal!

At USC, they are called "Song Girls", not cheerleaders.

[Ranger Mom]

I just can't believe a cheerleader, knowing she could be shown nationally, wouldn't wear panties, or whatever, under her uniform.

I have a hard time believing that it happened....NOW, if the pic that Emerson posted is the shot everyone saw, I can understand why they thought they saw what they saw...or didn't see, I guess.

She obviously has undies or bloomers on....they are just of the creepy crawly variety!!:D

[lepfan]

Originally posted by Emerson1
Sorry to spoil your fantasy

http://img387.imageshack.us/img387/8243/uscsonggirlhdxf5.jpg It certainly looks like she has on 'cheekies' that are now in her crack!!!! It does not look like she had nothing on to me....

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by lepfan
It certainly looks like she has on 'cheekies' that are now in her crack!!!! It does not look like she had nothing on to me....

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: ROFLMAO!! I am sure Casey is beside himself at this point in the conversation.

[espn1]

That's a great recruiting tool.

[Emerson1]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCv6S9uk8o4

That is probably the video everyone saw live. I wouldn't know, I was watching in HD:D

[ASUFrisbeeStud]

That video definitly makes her look a little less clothed than the picture does.

[Adidas410s]

Originally posted by Emerson1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCv6S9uk8o4

That is probably the video everyone saw live. I wouldn't know, I was watching in HD:D

umm...watching it in HD is still the same feed as the regular programming! Notice the ABC HD logo in the picture you posted! ;)

[Emerson1]

So watching in HD is the exact same as watching analog? I guess we wasted money getting these HD channels if I can just flip to ch.8 and get the exact same picture.:doh:

[ASUFrisbeeStud]

Well it's the same feed just higher resolution on the HD channels.

[Emerson1]

Thus making it easier to see on an HD channel then an analog channel.

[ASUFrisbeeStud]

I knew what you meant, I wasn't arguing.

[SintonFan]

Originally posted by crzyjournalist03
Since when are wedgies hot? It's not like she's in any kind of sexy underwear there...those are normal panties! That's not sexy...that's something that happens to nerds in seventh grade.
.
Rofl! :clap: :D

[buff4life]

i'm not sure if anybody has said this but if they have, i'm reinforcing it....she have a very NICE behind!!

[Phil C]

What in the name of indecency was she thinking about!
Don't they know that if they dress like that they might be exposed!

:mad:

[Adidas410s]

Originally posted by Emerson1
Thus making it easier to see on an HD channel then an analog channel.

You said "That is probably the video everyone saw live. I wouldn't know, I was watching in HD" so I read that as you saying "I was seeing something different on my screen than the broadcast that comes through regular digital programming."

[Ranger Mom]

Originally posted by Adidas410s
You said "That is probably the video everyone saw live. I wouldn't know, I was watching in HD" so I read that as you saying "I was seeing something different on my screen than the broadcast that comes through regular digital programming."

So basically he just got a clearer, more highly defined shot??

[Adidas410s]

Originally posted by Ranger Mom
So basically he just got a clearer, more highly defined shot??

I guess...I just read his comment as saying "I saw something different (as in not the same picture) on my screen because I was watching it in HD." I was just clarifying that the game is the exact same broadcast whether you are on analog/digital/HD...the quality of the picture is improved on HD though.

[Emerson1]

It's not the same then. Me watching in HD would give me a better view on whether or not she had something on. That is clearly shown on the video and picture I posted, and it's not the EXACT same broadcast. If it was the EXACT same then it wouldn't be in HD, and it wouldn't give me an extra 10 inches of viewing space with it being widescreen.

[Adidas410s]

Originally posted by Emerson1
It's not the same then. Me watching in HD would give me a better view on whether or not she had something on. That is clearly shown on the video and picture I posted, and it's not the EXACT same broadcast. If it was the EXACT same then it wouldn't be in HD, and it wouldn't give me an extra 10 inches of viewing space with it being widescreen.

You're seeing the same picture that comes out of the cameras...they don't magically generate the outsides of the picture. Somebody watching on a 4:3 TV instead of a 16:9 is either seeing a condensed picture or one that cuts off the outside of the picture. Either way, you were looking at the same image...it's not like they were seeing cheerleaders and you were seeing Brent Musberger. The HD image simply provides greater resolution and detail of the image.

[BILLYFRED0000]

Originally posted by Funk-d-fied
It was awesome!

Yeah I dated her sister. We told her she had put on a couple of pounds and needed larger breifs but NOOOO she would not listen.

[rangerjoe33]

Originally posted by Adidas410s
You're seeing the same picture that comes out of the cameras...they don't magically generate the outsides of the picture. Somebody watching on a 4:3 TV instead of a 16:9 is either seeing a condensed picture or one that cuts off the outside of the picture. Either way, you were looking at the same image...it's not like they were seeing cheerleaders and you were seeing Brent Musberger. The HD image simply provides greater resolution and detail of the image.

I cannot believe you are having to explain this.......

[Fotbol]

Another Faulty equipment moment(Janet Jackson:D ) I'm sure Justin Timberlake turn the fan on that poor innocent cheerleader:rolleyes: :D :devil:

[Adidas410s]

Originally posted by rangerjoe33
I cannot believe you are having to explain this.......

sometimes I just don't have anything better to do...:(

[Phil C]

Ad what was she thinking?
It is indecent!

I AM SHOCKED! SHOCKED! SHOCKED!!


:eek: :eek: :mad: :mad: