PDA

View Full Version : New Top 20



Matthew328
10-27-2002, 09:14 PM
is now posted along with the new Region 3 Top 10...other updates are happening later tonight

OLiNeMaN
10-27-2002, 09:20 PM
Great to see Kennedale up there! I like it!

Keith7
10-27-2002, 09:27 PM
No Gainesville?

eye of the tiger
10-27-2002, 09:34 PM
looks pretty good Matthew.

topdawg
10-27-2002, 09:57 PM
i see liberty hill made it

FBmania
10-27-2002, 11:13 PM
My computer doesn't have to top 20 updated. I tried the refresh button and everything. Could someone post it on here please? Thanks.

bigbullbacker
10-27-2002, 11:35 PM
I'm not seeing the list whatsup?

ProudMama
10-27-2002, 11:40 PM
Where is the list?

Keith7
10-27-2002, 11:43 PM
1. Sinton (8-0)
2. Burnet (8-0)
3. Jasper (6-2)
4. Kennedale (7-1)
5. Everman (7-1)
6. Wills Point (8-0)
7. Newton (7-0)
8. Bridge City (7-1)
9. LaGrange (7-1)
10. Forney (7-1)
11. Wilmer-Hutchins (7-0)
12. Celina (8-0)
13. Midland Greenwood (8-0)
14. Marlin (6-2)
15. Longview Spring Hill (7-1)
16. Commerce (6-2)
17. New Boston (8-0)
18. Decatur (8-0)
19. Quinlan Ford (8-0)
20. Liberty Hill (8-0)

Jimbotex40
10-28-2002, 12:21 AM
wilmer hutchins is too high on the list. forney beat madison by 29 and hutch beat them by 2, so to have hutch only one below us is a contradiction.

well, ill just let you change it after crandall gives them a really close game this week.

p.s. what is crandall gonna be ranked if they win?

jason
10-28-2002, 12:25 AM
I agree...Hutch barely got past Madison who got blown out by a talented Foney team...Probably the best 3A team in the DFW area. Forney v Hutchinson shoule be a good game to close out the regular season.

Matthew328
10-28-2002, 12:30 AM
Remember Hutch was without 4 starters on D in the Madison game....they are all healthy now and remember comparing scores doesn't mean a whole heck of a lot...

Jimbotex40
10-28-2002, 12:33 AM
true that is matthew

did u hear about the fight among the hutch players on the sideline at kaufman?

will their lack of unity keep them from beating a very fundamental forney team?

jason
10-28-2002, 12:39 AM
FORNEY WILL NOT LOSE TO WILMER HUTCHINS. IT'S THAT SIMPLE

FORNEY 42
HUTCH 13

SkandarAkbar
10-28-2002, 03:09 AM
Hey Jason, how many Wilmer HUTCHINS games have you seen? You probably haven't seen them play, you are just basing your opinion on one game they played against one team. A game in which they were missing key players. Oh, by the way, it's Wilmer HUTCHINS, not Hutchinson. If you are going to make a comment, at least attempt to be knowledgeable of the teams you are referring to.

Matthew328
10-28-2002, 08:16 AM
Didn't hear about the fight against Kaufman or anything like that....if that is true then it may not bode well for Hutch...Hutch is extremely talented and they can play with Forney...I don't know if they can beat em but if they play thier game they are more than capable of doing it..they have the type of team that could give Forney fits on both sides of the ball..defensively they are similar to Everman (when healthy) they fly to the ball and have speed all over the field..they have 2 very good tackles and a MLB that runs sideline to sideline very well..offensively they throw the ball well they have 3 recievers in Hudson Jones Scroggins...Hudson and Jones are both the go to guys and Scroggins is a physical reciever at 6'4..and they have about 6 guys who share the load at running back..

stone_cold
10-28-2002, 10:52 AM
For anyone who really cares.. there is no lack of unity at the Hutch!! And if what you saw was a "fight" on the sidelines... you have obviosly never been in the heat of the battle!! All that was was two very competitive offensive linemen challenging each other to do better.
W-H is back healthy and both the Crandall and Forney games should be great ones!! Those are three very good teams that should all do well in the playoffs!!

Matthew328
10-28-2002, 11:09 AM
I didn't think there was a fight on the sidelines..I doubt if Coach Robinson would stand for that..

cts76325i@skool
10-28-2002, 11:32 AM
ok i am going with hutch by 12

repeat2002
10-28-2002, 11:34 AM
I hope that Forney's fourth down play-calling has improved since last year if someone considers them to be better than Everman or Kennedale this year. I can't see how they would be better than either of these teams.

repeat2002
10-28-2002, 11:37 AM
I hope that Forney's fourth down play-calling has improved since last year if someone considers them to be better than Everman or Kennedale this year. I can't see how they would be better than either of these teams.

jason
10-28-2002, 01:25 PM
Hutch barely beat untalented Dallas Madison...they gave up 52 points to Madison...Forney beat the same untalented Madison team by 4 touchdowns. Put 2 & 2 together. Forney will not lose to Wilmer HUTCHINS.

Forney 42
Hutchins 13

footballguy 22
10-28-2002, 02:26 PM
I PROMISE YOU WILMER-HUTCHINS WILL NOT LOSE TO FORNEY BY THAT MANY POINTS. W-H HAVE NOT LOST BY THAT MANY POINTS SINCE THE 2000 PLAYOFFS. I SEE IT AS A 7 POINT WIN FOR EITHER TEAM.

big daddy russ
10-28-2002, 03:12 PM
i haven't seen any of the DFW teams play this year, but it seems like it would be going out on a limb to say that forney is the most talented 3A team in that area. last year, them and everman were pretty evenly matched, and hutch and kennedale both seem pretty strong. has anybody actually seen at least three of these teams at full strength, and not just heard about it or read scores and stats in the newspaper? let me know what you think. is forney really that talented? heck, start up a new post with that subject. seems like we're getting off the beaten path here, but it's something i'd like to know more about.