Massey Ratings through Playoff Week 1

[WOS87]

Chng Team W L T Rating Power Offense Defense Sched

1 Celina 11 0 0 2.230 52.23 ( 1) 50.05 ( 3) 23.87 ( 1) 20.44 ( 35) 3A II-9
2 Giddings 11 0 0 2.093 46.33 ( 3) 47.96 ( 5) 20.06 ( 3) 25.38 ( 11) 3A III-23
3 W Orange Stark 11 0 0 2.084 47.10 ( 2) 46.26 ( 6) 22.53 ( 2) 23.78 ( 18) 3A III-21
4 + 1 Wimberley 10 1 0 1.946 44.20 ( 5) 49.17 ( 4) 16.72 ( 12) 25.00 ( 12) 3A IV-25
5 + 1 Liberty Hill 8 2 0 1.922 45.84 ( 4) 53.95 ( 1) 13.58 ( 29) 32.20 ( 1) 3A III-18
6 + 2 Cuero 11 0 0 1.764 38.92 ( 8) 43.30 ( 13) 17.31 ( 10) 15.49 ( 61) 3A IV-29
7 + 4 Robinson 9 2 0 1.723 39.37 ( 6) 46.01 ( 8) 15.06 ( 19) 27.52 ( 7) 3A III-17
8 + 2 Abilene Wylie 9 2 0 1.694 37.30 ( 9) 39.54 ( 25) 19.46 ( 4) 27.99 ( 4) 3A I-7
9 - 2 Decatur 10 1 0 1.638 37.28 ( 10) 45.45 ( 9) 13.52 ( 30) 21.63 ( 30) 3A I-8
10 - 6 Gilmer 9 1 0 1.599 39.12 ( 7) 52.96 ( 2) 7.85 ( 66) 14.94 ( 63) 3A II-15

Chng Team W L T Rating Power Offense Defense Sched

11 + 3 Hondo 11 0 0 1.593 36.40 ( 12) 46.05 ( 7) 12.04 ( 41) 5.57 (127) 3A IV-28
12 + 1 Sweetwater 9 2 0 1.570 35.81 ( 13) 41.20 ( 16) 16.30 ( 15) 24.99 ( 13) 3A I-7
13 + 2 Palestine 9 2 0 1.539 36.43 ( 11) 39.25 ( 26) 18.87 ( 5) 23.06 ( 20) 3A III-19
14 - 5 Hutto 7 3 0 1.509 34.77 ( 14) 43.59 ( 11) 12.87 ( 34) 29.11 ( 2) 3A III-18
15 + 1 La Vega 8 2 0 1.480 33.99 ( 15) 37.64 ( 34) 18.04 ( 7) 22.96 ( 22) 3A III-17
16 + 7 Liberty Eylau 8 3 0 1.403 32.02 ( 18) 35.64 ( 40) 18.07 ( 6) 24.75 ( 15) 3A II-16
17 - 5 Bellville 8 3 0 1.388 33.05 ( 17) 40.72 ( 19) 14.03 ( 27) 22.57 ( 25) 3A III-23
18 - 1 Dal Madison 10 0 0 1.358 28.04 ( 26) 40.05 ( 23) 9.67 ( 52) 10.11 (100) 3A II-11
19 + 1 Silsbee 9 2 0 1.344 28.33 ( 25) 36.31 ( 37) 13.71 ( 28) 21.11 ( 32) 3A III-21
20 - 2 Yoe 6 4 0 1.321 33.19 ( 16) 40.10 ( 21) 14.78 ( 22) 27.36 ( 8) 3A III-18

Chng Team W L T Rating Power Offense Defense Sched

21 - 2 Monahans 9 1 0 1.299 29.96 ( 21) 38.35 ( 32) 13.30 ( 32) 10.73 ( 95) 3A I-1
22 - 1 Sanger 8 2 0 1.279 28.92 ( 24) 39.75 ( 24) 10.87 ( 46) 17.11 ( 52) 3A I-8
23 - 1 China Spring 8 3 0 1.262 26.82 ( 30) 41.42 ( 14) 7.08 ( 71) 23.79 ( 17) 3A III-17
24 + 1 Gatesville 6 4 0 1.243 29.91 ( 22) 38.93 ( 29) 12.67 ( 36) 27.02 ( 9) 3A III-17
25 +28 Columbia 7 4 0 1.230 30.20 ( 20) 36.88 ( 36) 15.01 ( 21) 21.24 ( 31) 3A III-24
26 + 5 Royse City 10 1 0 1.229 26.73 ( 31) 43.48 ( 12) 4.94 ( 86) 10.87 ( 92) 3A II-10
27 + 5 Rusk 8 3 0 1.202 26.93 ( 28) 44.65 ( 10) 3.97 ( 99) 18.59 ( 46) 3A III-20
28 - 2 Canyon 9 2 0 1.195 26.61 ( 32) 39.23 ( 27) 9.08 ( 56) 14.05 ( 70) 3A I-5
29 - 2 Crockett 6 4 0 1.195 31.00 ( 19) 36.18 ( 38) 16.51 ( 13) 20.00 ( 39) 3A III-20
30 +22 Sweeny 9 2 0 1.194 26.90 ( 29) 31.76 ( 55) 16.82 ( 11) 14.43 ( 67) 3A III-24

Chng Team W L T Rating Power Offense Defense Sched

31 + 2 Atlanta 5 6 0 1.138 27.29 ( 27) 33.57 ( 47) 15.42 ( 17) 27.68 ( 5) 3A II-16
32 - 3 Snyder 8 3 0 1.129 26.57 ( 33) 30.75 ( 65) 17.51 ( 9) 14.93 ( 64) 3A I-3
33 - 5 Caldwell 5 5 0 1.097 29.71 ( 23) 38.86 ( 30) 12.54 ( 38) 23.37 ( 19) 3A III-23
34 Greenwood 10 1 0 1.089 23.10 ( 40) 37.15 ( 35) 7.64 ( 68) 9.14 (111) 3A I-3
35 Carthage 7 3 0 1.088 24.88 ( 36) 33.78 ( 46) 12.79 ( 35) 19.62 ( 42) 3A III-20
36 + 2 Kirbyville 8 3 0 1.085 24.67 ( 37) 41.22 ( 15) 5.14 ( 81) 16.26 ( 57) 3A III-21
37 +12 Wharton 7 4 0 1.084 23.35 ( 39) 41.07 ( 17) 3.97 ( 98) 21.94 ( 26) 3A III-24
38 -14 LaGrange 8 3 0 1.073 22.88 ( 42) 28.72 ( 84) 15.85 ( 16) 18.27 ( 48) 3A III-23
39 - 9 Madisonville 7 4 0 1.072 26.31 ( 34) 38.36 ( 31) 9.64 ( 53) 19.47 ( 43) 3A III-19
40 Groesbeck 6 4 0 1.033 22.86 ( 43) 40.08 ( 22) 4.47 ( 90) 21.67 ( 27) 3A III-19

Chng Team W L T Rating Power Offense Defense Sched

41 + 2 Brownsboro 8 3 0 1.013 23.99 ( 38) 33.90 ( 45) 11.78 ( 43) 13.21 ( 74) 3A II-14
42 - 6 Burkburnett 6 3 0 1.010 22.30 ( 48) 27.51 ( 96) 16.47 ( 14) 20.88 ( 33) 3A I-6
43 + 2 Westwood-Pal 6 4 0 0.989 22.85 ( 44) 40.37 ( 20) 4.17 ( 95) 21.67 ( 28) 3A III-19
44 - 7 Graham 5 5 0 0.983 22.61 ( 46) 29.77 ( 71) 14.53 ( 25) 23.06 ( 21) 3A I-6
45 + 1 Kennedale 8 3 0 0.972 21.48 ( 49) 29.02 ( 80) 14.15 ( 26) 12.96 ( 75) 3A II-12
46 + 2 Connally-Waco 4 6 0 0.971 25.17 ( 35) 29.17 ( 78) 17.69 ( 8) 25.51 ( 10) 3A III-17
47 - 5 Taylor 4 6 0 0.958 23.06 ( 41) 29.65 ( 72) 15.10 ( 18) 27.58 ( 6) 3A III-18
48 + 6 Diboll 8 3 0 0.950 21.26 ( 52) 40.73 ( 18) 2.22 (113) 13.80 ( 73) 3A III-20
49 + 6 Lake Worth 8 3 0 0.916 21.30 ( 51) 38.01 ( 33) 4.98 ( 85) 12.51 ( 80) 3A II-11
50 + 1 Breckenridge 6 4 0 0.916 21.36 ( 50) 31.48 ( 58) 11.57 ( 44) 19.75 ( 41) 3A I-7

Chng Team W L T Rating Power Offense Defense Sched

51 - 4 Perryton 7 3 0 0.916 22.30 ( 47) 34.84 ( 43) 9.15 ( 55) 12.23 ( 82) 3A I-5
52 - 8 Argyle 7 4 0 0.910 20.98 ( 53) 32.01 ( 54) 10.66 ( 47) 17.49 ( 50) 3A I-8
53 - 3 Vernon 5 5 0 0.903 22.76 ( 45) 31.01 ( 62) 13.44 ( 31) 20.35 ( 37) 3A I-6
54 -15 Prosper 8 3 0 0.895 18.47 ( 64) 31.56 ( 56) 8.60 ( 60) 14.10 ( 69) 3A II-9
55 +16 Ingleside 10 1 0 0.892 17.75 ( 66) 35.46 ( 41) 3.98 ( 97) 3.53 (137) 3A IV-30
56 +16 Needville 7 3 0 0.875 20.25 ( 54) 30.55 ( 68) 11.40 ( 45) 13.82 ( 72) 3A III-24
57 + 4 Pilot Pt 7 4 0 0.851 19.37 ( 57) 26.36 (104) 14.70 ( 23) 16.34 ( 56) 3A II-9
58 -17 Devine 9 2 0 0.836 18.78 ( 63) 32.49 ( 53) 7.98 ( 65) 6.26 (125) 3A IV-28
59 - 1 Rains 8 3 0 0.817 19.21 ( 60) 28.88 ( 82) 12.02 ( 42) 10.41 ( 99) 3A II-10
60 - 1 Iowa Park 5 5 0 0.806 19.36 ( 58) 31.55 ( 57) 9.50 ( 54) 19.83 ( 40) 3A I-6

Chng Team W L T Rating Power Offense Defense Sched

61 - 5 Dalhart 8 2 0 0.804 18.11 ( 65) 27.67 ( 93) 12.13 ( 39) 6.21 (126) 3A I-5
62 + 7 La Vernia 7 3 0 0.788 20.15 ( 55) 29.30 ( 75) 12.54 ( 37) 11.42 ( 89) 3A IV-26
63 Llano 6 4 0 0.786 19.03 ( 61) 30.15 ( 69) 10.56 ( 48) 13.95 ( 71) 3A IV-25
64 + 3 Bridge City 6 4 0 0.786 16.56 ( 72) 28.24 ( 89) 10.01 ( 50) 17.25 ( 51) 3A III-21
65 - 8 WF Hirschi 7 4 0 0.771 17.62 ( 68) 27.24 ( 98) 12.07 ( 40) 12.40 ( 81) 3A I-6
66 Mexia 3 7 0 0.765 19.22 ( 59) 38.95 ( 28) 1.96 (117) 24.96 ( 14) 3A III-19
67 +13 Medina Val 8 3 0 0.765 14.85 ( 77) 28.20 ( 90) 8.33 ( 62) 9.62 (106) 3A IV-27
68 - 1 Ling Lu 7 3 0 0.752 13.67 ( 82) 27.62 ( 94) 7.74 ( 67) 10.87 ( 93) 3A IV-26
69 - 5 Clyde 5 5 0 0.746 15.40 ( 75) 32.75 ( 50) 4.33 ( 93) 20.23 ( 38) 3A I-7
70 -10 West 8 3 0 0.742 17.29 ( 69) 30.81 ( 64) 8.18 ( 63) 7.96 (117) 3A II-12

[WOS87]

Interesting.... they have Giddings ranked one spot ahead of WO-S but they have WO-S as the team most likely to win the matchup 52% - 48%

W Orange Stark (11-0) 0 26.21 (52)
Giddings (11-0) 0 25.45 (48)

Link to page of all Massey projections for Week 2 (http://www.masseyratings.com/pred.php?sub=318312&days=7)

[Boosty_Hondo]

Originally posted by WOS87
Interesting.... they have Giddings ranked one spot ahead of WO-S but they have WO-S as the team most likely to win the matchup 52% - 48%

that is very odd

[carter08]

Bellville is still ahead of Columbia despite Columbia beating them

[Boosty_Hondo]

and gilmer is still inthe top 10 even though they lost?/?

[pirate4state]

All these numbers give me a headache!! :nerd:

What do they all really mean? :confused:

[Boosty_Hondo]

Originally posted by pirate4state
All these numbers give me a headache!! :nerd:

What do they all really mean? :confused:

not that hard to give u a headache u jsut have to say a sentence that makes some what sence and there ya go

[KL3]

Originally posted by carter08
Bellville is still ahead of Columbia despite Columbia beating them

Bellville also beat WC earlier this season.

[Necked]

Hmmm, so if I read this chart correckly, does that mean that Columbia is now only 4 power points away from being able to purchase a Level 2 Mage Amplification Crystal?? :thinking:

[WOS87]

3A Projections for Week 2
(listed in order from easiest to predict to most difficult to call)

The numbers in the middle are the projected scores and the numbers in parentheses are the percent likelihood of that team winning.

Wimberley (10-1) 41 (98%)
Medina Val (8-3) 12 (2%)

Dal Madison (10-0) 16 (4%)
Celina (11-0) 40 (96%)

Rio Hondo (10-1) 13 (6%)
Cuero (11-0) 35 (94%)

Llano (6-4) 18 (11%)
Hondo (11-0) 35 (89%)

Liberty Eylau (8-3) 28 (88%)
Chapel Hill (6-5) 12 (12%)

La Feria (8-2) 18 (14%)
Ingleside (10-1) 33 (86%)

Liberty Hill (8-2) 37 (85%)
Crockett (6-4) 23 (15%)

Pleasanton (6-5) 14 (18%)
La Vernia (7-3) 27 (82%)

Vernon (5-5) 15 (18%)
Sweetwater (9-2) 28 (82%)

Greenwood (10-1) 34 (78%)
Clint (9-1) 23 (22%)

Canyon (9-2) 20 (23%)
Abilene Wylie (9-2) 30 (78%)

Rusk (8-3) 27 (31%)
La Vega (8-2) 34 (69%)

Sanger (8-2) 25 (67%)
Graham (5-5) 19 (33%)

Royse City (10-1) 29 (65%)
Kennedale (8-3) 24 (36%)

Pleasant Grove (4-7) 22 (38%)
Canton (7-4) 26 (62%)

Port Isabel (8-2) 22 (39%)
Orange Grove (10-1) 26 (61%)

Snyder (8-3) 18 (41%)
Monahans (9-1) 21 (60%)

Brownsboro (8-3) 0 19 (41%)
Atlanta (5-6) 0 22 (59%)

Robinson (9-2) 27 (58%)
Palestine (9-2) 24 (42%)

Sweeny (9-2) 27 (56%)
Kirbyville (8-3) 24 (44%)

Pilot Pt (7-4) 21 (45%)
Lake Worth (8-3) 23 (55%)

Silsbee (9-2) 21 (45%)
Columbia (7-4) 23 (55%)

W Orange Stark (11-0) 26 (52%)
Giddings (11-0) 25 (48%)

Ft Stockton (7-3) 0 22 (52%)
Andrews (4-7) 0 22 (48%)

[TxStBobcat]

Originally posted by WOS87
3A Projections for Week 2
(listed in order from easiest to predict to most difficult to call)

The numbers in the middle are the projected scores and the numbers in parentheses are the percent likelihood of that team winning.

Wimberley (10-1) 0 40.84 (98)
Medina Val (8-3) 0 12.11 (2)

Dal Madison (10-0) 0 16.41 (4)
Celina (11-0) 0 40.38 (96)

Rio Hondo (10-1) 0 13.01 (6)
Cuero (11-0) 0 34.67 (94)

Llano (6-4) 0 18.25 (11)
Hondo (11-0) 0 35.48 (89)

Liberty Eylau (8-3) 0 27.61 (88)
Chapel Hill (6-5) 0 11.88 (12)

La Feria (8-2) 0 18.26 (14)
Ingleside (10-1) 0 33.22 (86)

Liberty Hill (8-2) 0 37.45 (85)
Crockett (6-4) 0 22.64 (15)

Pleasanton (6-5) 0 14.48 (18)
La Vernia (7-3) 0 27.30 (82)

Vernon (5-5) 0 15.02 (18)
Sweetwater (9-2) 0 27.76 (82)

Greenwood (10-1) 0 34.08 (78)
Clint (9-1) 0 23.22 (22)

Canyon (9-2) 0 19.86 (23)
Abilene Wylie (9-2) 0 30.46 (78)

Rusk (8-3) 0 26.63 (31)
La Vega (8-2) 0 33.67 (69)

Sanger (8-2) 0 25.24 (67)
Graham (5-5) 0 19.02 (33)

Royse City (10-1) 0 29.34 (65)
Kennedale (8-3) 0 24.11 (36)

Pleasant Grove (4-7) 0 22.18 (38)
Canton (7-4) 0 26.33 (62)

Port Isabel (8-2) 0 22.16 (39)
Orange Grove (10-1) 0 26.00 (61)

Snyder (8-3) 0 17.62 (41)
Monahans (9-1) 0 20.91 (60)

Brownsboro (8-3) 0 18.61 (41)
Atlanta (5-6) 0 21.84 (59)

Robinson (9-2) 0 27.15 (58)
Palestine (9-2) 0 24.22 (42)

Sweeny (9-2) 0 26.64 (56)
Kirbyville (8-3) 0 24.42 (44)

Pilot Pt (7-4) 0 21.44 (45)
Lake Worth (8-3) 0 23.35 (55)

Silsbee (9-2) 0 21.36 (45)
Columbia (7-4) 0 23.20 (55)

Ft Stockton (7-3) 0 22.18 (52)
Andrews (4-7) 0 21.63 (48)

W Orange Stark (11-0) 0 26.21 (52)
Giddings (11-0) 0 25.45 (48)

I see you put the toss ups at the bottom and the predicted "sure things" at the top. Makes reading it much easier. Thank you.

[WOS87]

Originally posted by Necked
Hmmm, so if I read this chart correckly, does that mean that Columbia is now only 4 power points away from being able to purchase a Level 2 Mage Amplification Crystal?? :thinking:

LOL

No, but it does mean that District 24's stock is skyrocketing as West Columbia's ranking increased 28 spots from last week, Sweeny jumped up 22 spots and even Wharton (who lost by 48 points) jumped up 12 spots in the rankings. Part of that is due to Columbia and Sweeny winning last week but a large part of it is your collective strengths of schedule increasing. Every win that one of your past opponents gets counts towards your rating too.

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by WOS87
3A Projections for Week 2
(listed in order from easiest to predict to most difficult to call)

The numbers in the middle are the projected scores and the numbers in parentheses are the percent likelihood of that team winning.

Wimberley (10-1) 0 40.84 (98)
Medina Val (8-3) 0 12.11 (2)

Dal Madison (10-0) 0 16.41 (4)
Celina (11-0) 0 40.38 (96)

Rio Hondo (10-1) 0 13.01 (6)
Cuero (11-0) 0 34.67 (94)

Llano (6-4) 0 18.25 (11)
Hondo (11-0) 0 35.48 (89)

Liberty Eylau (8-3) 0 27.61 (88)
Chapel Hill (6-5) 0 11.88 (12)

La Feria (8-2) 0 18.26 (14)
Ingleside (10-1) 0 33.22 (86)

Liberty Hill (8-2) 0 37.45 (85)
Crockett (6-4) 0 22.64 (15)

Pleasanton (6-5) 0 14.48 (18)
La Vernia (7-3) 0 27.30 (82)

Vernon (5-5) 0 15.02 (18)
Sweetwater (9-2) 0 27.76 (82)

Greenwood (10-1) 0 34.08 (78)
Clint (9-1) 0 23.22 (22)

Canyon (9-2) 0 19.86 (23)
Abilene Wylie (9-2) 0 30.46 (78)

Rusk (8-3) 0 26.63 (31)
La Vega (8-2) 0 33.67 (69)

Sanger (8-2) 0 25.24 (67)
Graham (5-5) 0 19.02 (33)

Royse City (10-1) 0 29.34 (65)
Kennedale (8-3) 0 24.11 (36)

Pleasant Grove (4-7) 0 22.18 (38)
Canton (7-4) 0 26.33 (62)

Port Isabel (8-2) 0 22.16 (39)
Orange Grove (10-1) 0 26.00 (61)

Snyder (8-3) 0 17.62 (41)
Monahans (9-1) 0 20.91 (60)

Brownsboro (8-3) 0 18.61 (41)
Atlanta (5-6) 0 21.84 (59)

Robinson (9-2) 0 27.15 (58)
Palestine (9-2) 0 24.22 (42)

Sweeny (9-2) 0 26.64 (56)
Kirbyville (8-3) 0 24.42 (44)

Pilot Pt (7-4) 0 21.44 (45)
Lake Worth (8-3) 0 23.35 (55)

Silsbee (9-2) 0 21.36 (45)
Columbia (7-4) 0 23.20 (55)

Ft Stockton (7-3) 0 22.18 (52)
Andrews (4-7) 0 21.63 (48)

W Orange Stark (11-0) 0 26.21 (52)
Giddings (11-0) 0 25.45 (48)

Okay, thanks. I understand now. :)

Dang - I really want to go watch WOS-Giddings. :(

[coach]

what about the palistine robinson game...im goin to try and go to this game would thise be wise? or am i wasting my time???

[Stownhorse]

I hate how that is set up....I have a frikin hard time reading that crap

[TAMUGRAD]

Originally posted by pirate4state
All these numbers give me a headache!! :nerd:

What do they all really mean? :confused:

They mean if your a betting man, go with the team with the higher percentage (or better chance to beat their opponent this week)

If you just love Texas high school football, go with your heart and cheer for your team.

Means ----- nothing.

Anything can happen on any given night. Hutto, Gilmer, and Decatur are ahead of a lot of teams on that list, and I did not even see Rio Hondo's name on the list, but who's still playing and who's rolling out the round balls this morning?

Means ----- nothing, just a lot of statistical crud for folks who get all tingly with that kind of info.

[wimbo_pro]

The further we get in the play offs, the less these numbers have meaning. Once you get to a certain level, its anyones game when the whistle blows. With that said...

Look at the drop off in power ratings as you move down the list. Celina (#1) is in a class of its own, with the closest team (Giddings, #2) being almost 10% below them. The next big drop off of this size is between Liberty Hill (#5) and Cuero (#6). Also, the top SIX teams are ALL D2. Wow!!!

[Adidas410s]

just curious...but I don't think these standings include all of the Saturday games. For example, it still shows Graham at 5-5, Madison at 10-0, Clyde at 5-5, etc. Have the numbers been updated yet?

[wimbo_pro]

The top 9 have been for sure...not sure about ALL of them.

[pirate4state]

Originally posted by TAMUGRAD
They mean if your a betting man, go with the team with the higher percentage (or better chance to beat their opponent this week)

If you just love Texas high school football, go with your heart and cheer for your team.

Means ----- nothing.

Anything can happen on any given night. Hutto, Gilmer, and Decatur are ahead of a lot of teams on that list, and I did not even see Rio Hondo's name on the list, but who's still playing and who's rolling out the round balls this morning?

Means ----- nothing, just a lot of statistical crud for folks who get all tingly with that kind of info.

:clap: :clap: Thanks, that's what I thought....a whole bunch of NOTHING!! :D ;)

[Adidas410s]

it says on their website that they don't update their ratings until Monday night so that they have time to make sure all their data is entered.

[wimbo_pro]

Yes Adidas...but i noticed it is updated now as opposed to the usual Tuesday morning. I suspect its due to the fact that most teams are done playing for the season, so the amount of data is much, much less. But the top 9 have the correct win-lose records to date. Dont know about others, havent even looked past these guys!

[Adidas410s]

Originally posted by wimbo_pro
Yes Adidas...but i noticed it is updated now as opposed to the usual Tuesday morning. I suspect its due to the fact that most teams are done playing for the season, so the amount of data is much, much less. But the top 9 have the correct win-lose records to date. Dont know about others, havent even looked past these guys!

oh ok. I never really looked at their site until mid-week anyways so I just now noticed the update info. To me, it looked like teams that played on Thursday or Friday have been updated but pretty quick I saw 12 or so teams that played on Saturday that hadn't been updated. Maybe it will change some tomorrow.

[OldNavy]

Originally posted by Adidas410s
just curious...but I don't think these standings include all of the Saturday games. For example, it still shows Graham at 5-5, Madison at 10-0, Clyde at 5-5, etc. Have the numbers been updated yet?

Madison only played a 9 game regular season. They had two bye weeks this year. They are 10-0.

[charlesrixey]

Thanks OL' Navy!

Why couldn't you be old marine corps?

And what is up with the other forum?