PDA

View Full Version : Texas "scenario"


Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 01:28 PM
A few things need to happen for the Horns to have a chance at the NC. Next this weekend Louisville will take on Rutgers, what needs to happen is Rutgers beats Louisville which would probably put out their NC hopes. Then we need Ohio to beat Michigan to give them a loss, then they would drop. Then we need West Virginia to beat Rutgers in the last game of the season to take care of that little shindig of a season they are having. So when that happens there will be one undefeated team, Ohio, which we will hopefully get another shot at in the NC. If that happens I think we are golden for the NC. Now if this scenaio happens thats another story but UT fans lets pray lol
Old Tiger
11-05-2006, 01:30 PM
Shut up
District303aPastPlayer
11-05-2006, 01:31 PM
Originally posted by Tiger WR
Shut up

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Emerson1
11-05-2006, 01:32 PM
Originally posted by Tiger WR
Shut up
His post is more informative then anything you have ever posted about Texas that wasn't copied and pasted
Old Tiger
11-05-2006, 01:33 PM
Originally posted by Emerson1
His post is more informative then anything you have ever posted about Texas that wasn't copied and pasted It's still a long shot.
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 01:39 PM
Originally posted by Tiger WR
It's still a long shot.

But its my opinion.
Old Tiger
11-05-2006, 01:40 PM
You're right my fault! Friends? :D
District303aPastPlayer
11-05-2006, 01:40 PM
Originally posted by Stownhorse
But its my opinion.

theres a better chance of UM/tOSU parts 1 and 2.. as opposed to UT/tOSU which would probably end the same way a second time.

and who's to say that if the Ville wins out they dont vault into the #2 spot... they are a) undefeated, b) from a conference with more road wins vs the BCS than the Big XII, and c) just would have beat the #3 and #15 team in the nation....
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 01:42 PM
Originally posted by District303aPastPlayer
theres a better chance of UM/tOSU parts 1 and 2.. as opposed to UT/tOSU which would probably end the same way a second time.

Texas is a diff. team from their first meeting.
District303aPastPlayer
11-05-2006, 01:43 PM
Originally posted by Stownhorse
Texas is a diff. team from their first meeting.

last i checked their roster stayed the same... now if they are playin at another level, say that, but they are still the same texas team
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 01:44 PM
Originally posted by District303aPastPlayer
last i checked their roster stayed the same... now if they are playin at another level, say that, but they are still the same texas team

you knew what I meant...That was a pointless post.
Old Tiger
11-05-2006, 01:44 PM
I think he's talking about the maturation of Colt McCoy
District303aPastPlayer
11-05-2006, 01:45 PM
Originally posted by Stownhorse
you knew what I meant...That was a pointless post.

no it wasnt... losing 15 starters to injuries from week 2 to week 10 makes you a different team...

turning your playing level around from week 2 to week 10 makes you a better playing team which has become more complete...
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 01:46 PM
Originally posted by Tiger WR
I think he's talking about the maturation of Colt McCoy

EXACTLY! Thanks Tiger
District303aPastPlayer
11-05-2006, 01:47 PM
like i said, say that then... now that WVU is out of the National Championship picture and both my picks from last year are done with the chase for the title...

Louisville should vault up tp #2 if they win out.

tOSU vs Louisville :)
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 01:50 PM
Originally posted by District303aPastPlayer
Louisville should vault up tp #2 if they win out.

tOSU vs Louisville :)

Thats what will happen more than likely.
carter08
11-05-2006, 01:51 PM
YOU ARE WRONG!!!!

There would still be 2 undefeated, Ohio State and Boise State. Boise State just wouldn't play in the NC game because the WAC is weak
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 01:52 PM
Originally posted by carter08
YOU ARE WRONG!!!!

There would still be 2 undefeated, Ohio State and Boise State. Boise State just wouldn't play in the NC game because the WAC is weak

Yes but like the confrence name they are WAC
carter08
11-05-2006, 01:54 PM
Boise is a very good team who will play an entire D1 season without suffering a loss
Old Tiger
11-05-2006, 01:56 PM
Originally posted by carter08
Boise is a very good team who will play an entire D1 season without suffering a loss Unfortunately they will probably end up meeting Texas.
carter08
11-05-2006, 01:57 PM
I am confident Boise State will win if they play the University of Texas
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 01:58 PM
Originally posted by Tiger WR
Unfortunately they will probably end up meeting Texas.

LOL man dont make me sad...you gotta shoot for the sky even though we will probably land in the trees
Old Tiger
11-05-2006, 01:58 PM
If Ian Johnson isn't sucessful then they won't win. He is the key to their offense and Texas run D is phenominal.
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 01:59 PM
Originally posted by carter08
I am confident Boise State will win if they play the University of Texas

Wanna bet?
carter08
11-05-2006, 02:01 PM
Originally posted by Stownhorse
Wanna bet?

Sure. No money though
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 02:04 PM
Originally posted by carter08
Sure. No money though \

Then whats the point?
carter08
11-05-2006, 02:06 PM
Originally posted by Stownhorse
\

Then whats the point?

See, the problem is...

1) 3aDownlow does not condone gambling
2) I have no idea how you will get said money to me
3) On the rare chance i lose, I'M POOR
Stownhorse
11-05-2006, 02:08 PM
Originally posted by carter08
See, the problem is...

1) 3aDownlow does not condone gambling
2) I have no idea how you will get said money to me
3) On the rare chance i lose, I'M POOR

haha on the rare chance you lose
Gobbla2001
11-05-2006, 03:18 PM
Originally posted by District303aPastPlayer
theres a better chance of UM/tOSU parts 1 and 2.. as opposed to UT/tOSU which would probably end the same way a second time.

and who's to say that if the Ville wins out they dont vault into the #2 spot... they are a) undefeated, b) from a conference with more road wins vs the BCS than the Big XII, and c) just would have beat the #3 and #15 team in the nation....

you're just made because you had WV put in your sig and now they lost :p :D

In all seriousness, as late in the season as that OSU/Michigan game is, the chances of the losing team getting into the Nat'l championship if everyone else wins out it very slim, and is why the BCS won't do justice this year... last year everyone knew who the big dogs were...

As for OSU and Texas Part 2 going the same way as earlier this year I wouldn't go so far... OSU isn't any stronger or weaker than they were and Texas is much improved esspecially now that McCoy has solidified himself as one of the top QB's in the nation....

I still don't see UT making the title game and I won't hold my breath, but ya it'd be nice...

I don't see Louisville losing and I maybe see them in the Nat'l Championship against either OSU or Mich...
STXBramha
11-05-2006, 03:22 PM
Ya, WV was just dominated..i would be a little bitter too..Can't beat the only good team on ur schedule.
District303aPastPlayer
11-05-2006, 03:38 PM
Originally posted by STXBramha
Ya, WV was just dominated..i would be a little bitter too..Can't beat the only good team on ur schedule.

If turning the ball over via fumbles, and not strips is being dominated, sure... but did you watch the same game i watched?
Gobbla2001
11-05-2006, 03:48 PM
Originally posted by District303aPastPlayer
If turning the ball over via fumbles, and not strips is being dominated, sure...

You already know my opinion on that, ha...

if one team fumbles and the other doesn't, that team for sure was dominated in the fumble category... holding on to the ball is like blocking, the team that blocks better is gunna win in most cases as well as the team that holds on to the ball better...

wish I would have gotten to see this game though, damn friends :mad: