Everman drops to 42 in the Data Poll

[Matthew328]

Well since Everman didn't cover the spread they dropped again...LOL

[southern_thunder]

I know that I am behind times but can you give me the website for the Data Poll.

[bulldog65]

Click on this link...Data Poll (http://home1.gte.net/cpq29gpl/index.htm)
Since the loss to Kennedale, Everman has outscored opponents 157-7. Even Secretariat ran slower in the mud. :p

<small>[ October 21, 2002, 09:23 AM: Message edited by: bulldog65 ]</small>

[Matthew328]

Umm I don't know it off-hand..check the links section on the front page of the site

[cts76325i@skool]

i mean i understand why their ranking has dropped but still it leaves me going "HUH" eek!

[southern_thunder]

Thanks Bulldog65!!!

[Reveille]

http://www.fsuniverse.net/forums/graemlins/huh.gif Good grief!!

[Titans]

Good thing those data polls mean nothing!

When Everman wins the State Championship again, those data polls will once again be worthless.

Can't wait for the Everman vs. UNT game. Could be close...LOL!

[CHS_LB_38]

Is covering the spread the only factor in the data poll ranks?

[Chris Hart]

We all know that Everman is a top 5 team, possibly #1. You have some flaws in your ranking system, when you have Everman ranked #42. I know he factors in a spread and all, but something is seriously wrong with this picture.

<small>[ October 23, 2002, 12:18 PM: Message edited by: Chris Hart ]</small>

[dawgcatcher]

THAT MEANS THERE ARE 41 TEAMS IN 3A BETTER THAN EVERMAN! I TOO DISAGREE WITH THEIR SYSTEM OF RANKING.

[everman_guy]

At least the guy from Collier-Sharp has it figured that the spread breaks down at a certain point. The chances Everman will beat Godley by 63.5 are slim, just because they will put in reserves at least half the game. If they played the big guns the whole time, we all know the spread would covered easily. The Collier-Sharp guy stops counting spread at 50. I think he has more factors involved as well.