PDA

View Full Version : something really cool


PPHSfan
04-24-2006, 12:25 AM
Now you can predict any team vs any team in the past based on power ratings.

Now we can see if Forney really was number 2 lol.

Very Cool Link (http://www.calpreps.com/cgi-bin/2006/project_matchup.pl)
PPHSfan
04-24-2006, 08:02 PM
Here is an example of the fun you can have.

at Celina (TX)
[2005] Celina (TX) 35, [2005] Hutto (TX) 17

at Hutto (TX)
[2005] Celina (TX) 31, [2005] Hutto (TX) 17

at neutral site
[2005] Celina (TX) 34, [2005] Hutto (TX) 17
SwtwtrMstngs04
04-24-2006, 08:18 PM
That is so awesome. Of course every game i did involved Sweetwater vs. like Southlake just for kicks. but really cool
Phantom Stang
04-24-2006, 08:19 PM
Sweetwater 48
Highland Park 3
:eek:
Phantom Stang
04-24-2006, 08:20 PM
Originally posted by Phantom Stang
Sweetwater 48
Highland Park 3
:eek:
That's Amarillo H.P. BTW.:D
BIG BLUE DEFENSIVE END
04-24-2006, 08:21 PM
Originally posted by PPHSfan
Now you can predict any team vs any team in the past based on power ratings.

Now we can see if Forney really was number 2 lol.

Very Cool Link (http://www.calpreps.com/cgi-bin/2006/project_matchup.pl)

Dang, I was hoping for some mesmerizing spiraling vortex....
Phantom Stang
04-24-2006, 08:23 PM
at Sweetwater (TX)
[2005] Sweetwater (TX) 22, [2005] Hutto (TX) 21

at Hutto (TX)
[2005] Hutto (TX) 24, [2005] Sweetwater (TX) 21

at neutral site
[2005] Hutto (TX) 22, [2005] Sweetwater (TX) 21
Phantom Stang
04-24-2006, 08:29 PM
at Sweetwater (TX)
[2005] Sweetwater (TX) 24, [2005] Permian (Odessa, TX) 17

at Permian (Odessa, TX)
[2005] Sweetwater (TX) 22, [2005] Permian (Odessa, TX) 17

at neutral site
[2005] Sweetwater (TX) 22, [2005] Permian (Odessa, TX) 17
Chris Hart
04-24-2006, 08:40 PM
At Burnet
(2005) Liberty Hill 42, (2005) Burnet 24

At Liberty Hill
(2005) Liberty Hill 42, (2005) Burnet 22

Neutral Site
(2005) Liberty Hill 42, (2005) Burnet 22


However, this game actually did take place with the score being Burnet 63, Liberty Hill 34
:thinking:
Chris Hart
04-24-2006, 09:26 PM
It also had (2005) Celina beating (2005) 4A state finalist CC Calallen 31-14, and (2005) Celina beating (2005) Wimberley 21-14. I also found it interesting that they had (2003) Burnet beating (2003) Gainesville 31-28? Pretty neat site, but has many flaws....:doh:
Emerson1
04-24-2006, 09:33 PM
It's just a big numbers game, can' guage by class


at Carroll (Southlake, TX)
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 35, [2005] Celina (TX) 28

at Celina (TX)
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 34, [2005] Celina (TX) 28

at neutral site
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 35, [2005] Celina (TX) 28
turbostud
04-24-2006, 09:34 PM
It has Celina beating a 5a playoff team. It may be a Valley team but I just dont see Celina beating any 5a playoff team. Especially by 45 points. Celina is good but they aint that good.
at Celina (TX)
[2005] Celina (TX) 52, [2005] Weslaco (TX) 7

at Weslaco (TX)
[2005] Celina (TX) 50, [2005] Weslaco (TX) 7

at neutral site
[2005] Celina (TX) 50, [2005] Weslaco (TX) 7
District303aPastPlayer
04-24-2006, 09:35 PM
nevermind, got it
turbostud
04-24-2006, 09:39 PM
No way Whitesboro plays a 5a playoff team this close.
at Weslaco (TX)
[2005] Weslaco (TX) 28, [2005] Whitesboro (TX) 26

at Whitesboro (TX)
[2005] Weslaco (TX) 28, [2005] Whitesboro (TX) 27

at neutral site
[2005] Weslaco (TX) 28, [2005] Whitesboro (TX) 26


At least Whitesboro isnt the lowest of the low.
at Whitesboro (TX)
[2005] Whitesboro (TX) 44, [2005] Progreso (TX) 0

at Progreso (TX)
[2005] Whitesboro (TX) 42, [2005] Progreso (TX) 0

at neutral site
[2005] Whitesboro (TX) 42, [2005] Progreso (TX) 0
olddawggreen
04-24-2006, 09:42 PM
Hey this is fun:)

at Burnet (TX)
[2003] Burnet (TX) 40, [2003] Forney (TX) 27

at Forney (TX)
[2003] Burnet (TX) 38, [2003] Forney (TX) 28

at neutral site
[2003] Burnet (TX) 38, [2003] Forney (TX) 27
District303aPastPlayer
04-24-2006, 09:44 PM
at Skyline (Dallas, TX)
[2005] Sinton (TX) 21, [2005] Skyline (Dallas, TX) 17

at Sinton (TX)
[2005] Sinton (TX) 22, [2005] Skyline (Dallas, TX) 17

at neutral site
[2005] Sinton (TX) 22, [2005] Skyline (Dallas, TX) 17
olddawggreen
04-24-2006, 09:50 PM
Hmmmm

at Burnet (TX)
[2003] Burnet (TX) 35, [2003] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 31

at Carroll (Southlake, TX)
[2003] Burnet (TX) 33, [2003] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 31

at neutral site
[2003] Burnet (TX) 34, [2003] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 31
Phantom Stang
04-24-2006, 10:04 PM
I ain't makin' this up folks...

at Sweetwater (TX)
[2005] Sweetwater (TX) 28, [2005] Ryan (Denton, TX) 21

at Ryan (Denton, TX)
[2005] Sweetwater (TX) 26, [2005] Ryan (Denton, TX) 21

at neutral site
[2005] Sweetwater (TX) 27, [2005] Ryan (Denton, TX) 21
Bullaholic
04-24-2006, 10:06 PM
PPHSFan strikes again......I think he fills in the "matchup" scores and giggles. :D
Phantom Stang
04-24-2006, 10:09 PM
Originally posted by Bullaholic
PPHSFan strikes again......I think he fills in the "matchup" scores and giggles. :D
:D :clap:
Emerson1
04-24-2006, 10:10 PM
Originally posted by olddawggreen
Hey this is fun:)

at Burnet (TX)
[2003] Burnet (TX) 40, [2003] Forney (TX) 27

at Forney (TX)
[2003] Burnet (TX) 38, [2003] Forney (TX) 28

at neutral site
[2003] Burnet (TX) 38, [2003] Forney (TX) 27
That is far from true. If the 2003 Burnet Bulldogs can beat the Kansas City Chiefs, no way forney could hang with them.:rolleyes:
Phantom Stang
04-24-2006, 10:12 PM
This would have been Sweetwater's only loss in District 5-5A last year...

at Sweetwater (TX)
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 40, [2005] Sweetwater (TX) 19

at Carroll (Southlake, TX)
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 42, [2005] Sweetwater (TX) 17

at neutral site
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 41, [2005] Sweetwater (TX) 19
MHSvarsity2007
04-24-2006, 10:45 PM
just for kicks & giggles
at Merkel (TX)
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 62, [2005] Merkel (TX) 0

at Carroll (Southlake, TX)
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 62, [2005] Merkel (TX) 0

at neutral site
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 62, [2005] Merkel (TX) 0
PPHSfan
04-24-2006, 10:58 PM
Originally posted by MHSvarsity2007
just for kicks & giggles
at Merkel (TX)
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 62, [2005] Merkel (TX) 0

at Carroll (Southlake, TX)
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 62, [2005] Merkel (TX) 0

at neutral site
[2005] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 62, [2005] Merkel (TX) 0

I have tried several Powerhouse teams against weaker teams. I think 62-0 is the default arse whoopin.
MHSvarsity2007
04-24-2006, 10:59 PM
Originally posted by PPHSfan
I have tried several Powerhouse teams against weaker teams. I think 62-0 is the default arse whoopin.

i find it rather amusing for some reason, lol.
Chris Hart
04-25-2006, 06:21 PM
Originally posted by Emerson1
That is far from true. If the 2003 Burnet Bulldogs can beat the Kansas City Chiefs, no way forney could hang with them Exactly what I was thinking! They're giving Forney too much credit...:)
PJ Frye
04-25-2006, 07:51 PM
this is wrong
at Sinton (TX)
[2005] Cuero (TX) 35, [2005] Sinton (TX) 14

at Cuero (TX)
[2005] Cuero (TX) 35, [2005] Sinton (TX) 14

at neutral site
[2005] Cuero (TX) 35, [2005] Sinton (TX) 14
ro would have killed em 62-0...
its fun though
Adidas410s
04-25-2006, 08:01 PM
at least PPHS can feel good about himself for a few with this one...

at Celina (TX)
[2004] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 31, [2005] Celina (TX) 30

at Carroll (Southlake, TX)
[2004] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 31, [2005] Celina (TX) 28

at neutral site
[2004] Carroll (Southlake, TX) 33, [2005] Celina (TX) 31
NHSRattler60
04-25-2006, 08:04 PM
PROJECT A MATCHUP


at Navasota (TX)
[2004] Navasota (TX) 42, [2005] Navasota (TX) 17

at Navasota (TX)
[2004] Navasota (TX) 42, [2005] Navasota (TX) 17

at neutral site
[2004] Navasota (TX) 42, [2005] Navasota (TX) 17

if only at home

at Navasota (TX)
[2004] Navasota (TX) 28, [2004] Rice (Altair, TX) 27

at Rice (Altair, TX)
[2004] Rice (Altair, TX) 28, [2004] Navasota (TX) 27

at neutral site
[2004] Navasota (TX) 28, [2004] Rice (Altair, TX) 27
olddawggreen
04-25-2006, 09:54 PM
Originally posted by Emerson1
That is far from true. If the 2003 Burnet Bulldogs can beat the Kansas City Chiefs, no way forney could hang with them.:rolleyes:

Looks like Forney is hanging pretty low:D
SintonFan
04-25-2006, 10:00 PM
Originally posted by olddawggreen
Looks like Forney is hanging pretty low:D
.
lol
To be honest about this, let's think. Forney WAS the second best team in 2003, some agree and all from the Dallas/Fort Worth area do too.
Burnet of course was ranked 1.1 or 1.2 depending on who you asked. The Chief's of course would say 1.2. ;)
olddawggreen
04-25-2006, 10:03 PM
Oh man, I just can't get enough:devil:

at Burnet (TX)
[2003] Burnet (TX) 63, [2003] Marble Falls (TX) 3

at Marble Falls (TX)
[2003] Burnet (TX) 62, [2003] Marble Falls (TX) 3

at neutral site
[2003] Burnet (TX) 63, [2003] Marble Falls (TX) 3
PPHSfan
04-26-2006, 05:32 AM
Sure wish Old Card were here:D


at Bridge City (TX)
[2003] Pilot Point (TX) 22, [2003] Bridge City (TX) 14

at Pilot Point (TX)
[2003] Pilot Point (TX) 24, [2003] Bridge City (TX) 13

at neutral site
[2003] Pilot Point (TX) 24, [2003] Bridge City (TX) 13
Chris Hart
04-26-2006, 08:00 AM
Originally posted by PPHSfan
Sure wish Old Card were here:D


at Bridge City (TX)
[2003] Pilot Point (TX) 22, [2003] Bridge City (TX) 14

at Pilot Point (TX)
[2003] Pilot Point (TX) 24, [2003] Bridge City (TX) 13

at neutral site
[2003] Pilot Point (TX) 24, [2003] Bridge City (TX) 13 Now that's some funny stuff!:D