PDA

View Full Version : Wharton 39 vs. Stafford 6


LogieJoeBean001
10-22-2004, 10:47 PM
Final score. I don't have any details on this game, obviously I wasn't there. Just glad to see the Tigers back to their winning ways. Two more games to go in district guys! Don't take anything for granted now. Keep on a roll, Tigers!

Yea, I'm back. You guys knew I couldn't stay away from you. It's not the same without my 3adownlow!

Wow, I feel better now. I'm home!!!!!!! (LOL!)
LogieJoeBean001
10-23-2004, 07:25 AM
I would really like to hear from somebody who was at the game!
registered
10-23-2004, 08:57 AM
Must not have been much of a game because there is no score reported to the Houston Chronicle, or the Victoria Advocate.
SINTON81
10-23-2004, 09:29 AM
Glad you decided to stay LogieJoeBean001.:)
whrtntig1
10-23-2004, 09:33 AM
Wharton played a sloppy game the first half. It looked like everyone was playing way too cautious---like they were expecting a penalty to hit them. They came out the second half and by the end of the 3rd and beginning of the fourth the passes were caught, rushing improved, and they looked like they had gotten rid of the butterflies. even at the end, with new players in, Wharton didn't let us down!
BU97
10-23-2004, 11:23 AM
Originally posted by registered
Must not have been much of a game because there is no score reported to the Houston Chronicle, or the Victoria Advocate.

It is the home team's responsibility to send the stats to the newspaper.
bmbf_06
10-25-2004, 08:42 AM
Originally posted by registered
Must not have been much of a game because there is no score reported to the Houston Chronicle, or the Victoria Advocate.

A score not being reported does not mean anything-- friday's game was what the tigers needed to get back up. All we need to do is get thru Sweeny and Palacios!

GO BIG BLUE!GO BIG BLUE! GO BIG BLUE! GO BIG BLUE! :cheerl: :smoker:
cap76
10-25-2004, 09:21 AM
I would not say wharton played sloppy.The offense was not really on but they still put up 38 points. Defense played pretty good.With a couple of breakdowns in a VERY young sec. Stafford has some kids that can play if you let them.
raider red 2000
10-25-2004, 09:53 AM
i see the spatans beating needville this week and then playing sweeny for the 3rd spot to goto the playoffs....could be interesting.
pancho villa
10-25-2004, 09:56 AM
Stafford won't beat Sweeny.
FbCoachB40
10-25-2004, 09:58 AM
If we already know that Pancho, then lets just start the playoffs now.
cap76
10-25-2004, 10:13 AM
And Columbia won't beat Cuero
cap76
10-25-2004, 10:17 AM
Anyone besides me think that Columbia doesn't have a chance
scrub c
10-25-2004, 10:17 AM
cuero need to worry about yoakum,
then West Columbia.....
LogieJoeBean001
10-25-2004, 10:18 AM
Originally posted by SINTON81
Glad you decided to stay LogieJoeBean001.:)

Thanks a million. I'm glad I did too. I just missed all you guys/gals waaaay too much!!!
44INAROW
10-25-2004, 10:24 AM
Originally posted by cap76
And Columbia won't beat Cuero

CAP you from Cuero?
44INAROW
10-25-2004, 10:25 AM
Originally posted by scrub c
cuero need to worry about yoakum,
then West Columbia.....

Amen Scrub.. :D
pancho villa
10-25-2004, 11:04 AM
cap watch out.
cap76
10-25-2004, 12:48 PM
for what?
neck_06
10-25-2004, 09:55 PM
Originally posted by cap76
for what?

THE NECKS, thats who
Specklebelly
10-25-2004, 10:10 PM
West Columbia is going to give Cuero all they want and some in Round 1.
scrub c
10-26-2004, 09:16 AM
lets hope so
areacode337
10-26-2004, 09:20 AM
WC will beat Cuero.....WC has very good defense and quick scoring capabilities.....No. 26, No. 31. and two QB's that can get it done. Not to mention 22.....They can also play ball control and keep your defense on the field all night.
pancho villa
10-26-2004, 09:50 AM
thats what I'm talken bout.