To everyone hopeing Burnet would go to 4A...

[bulldawg89]

i just wanted everyone to know that Burnet remains 3A by "3" students!!! Cut off was 947, we got 944 :D

So to all those people talking trash because they think we should be 4A...UMmmm TOO BAD! Yall still have another few years With us!

[jason]

bulldawg89:
i just wanted everyone to know that Burnet remains 3A by "3" students!!! Cut off was 947, we got 944 :D

So to all those people talking trash because they think we should be 4A...UMmmm TOO BAD! Yall still have another few years With us!lol...thats not quite how it works...

[bulldawg89]

Actually Jason, unless our school board and UIL is lieing...that is how it works...

[Old Dog]

89 I too am confused, thought the "FINAL" breakdowon would not be issued until Feb 4. Anything prior to that is pure speculation and conjecture. If anyone from the UIL "leaked" breakdowns of classifications to a "friend", they should be subject to gettting their butt fired. When things are so close to call by 3 or 4 students, seems to me things could still change. Of course I hope to stay 3A, but?????????????????????

[Burnet Dawg06]

Bulldawg89, where did you get your info from?

[Frank_Bama]

I wont believe any numbers until they are posted in February. Anything that comes out before then will just be rumor.

<small>[ November 23, 2003, 06:28 PM: Message edited by: Frank_Bama ]</small>

[FranksBullDog]

Thats the way its always been.If you have that many students you will probably move up from the rumors i have heard.

[3afan2K3]

bulldawg89:
i just wanted everyone to know that Burnet remains 3A by "3" students!!! Cut off was 947, we got 944 :D

So to all those people talking trash because they think we should be 4A...UMmmm TOO BAD! Yall still have another few years With us!There is no cut-off, and I have never read anywhere on here people talking trash thinking yall should be 4A

<small>[ November 23, 2003, 06:45 PM: Message edited by: 3afan2K3 ]</small>

[bulldogvet85]

bulldawg89:
i just wanted everyone to know that Burnet remains 3A by "3" students!!! Cut off was 947, we got 944 :D

So to all those people talking trash because they think we should be 4A...UMmmm TOO BAD! Yall still have another few years With us!well they lied to you false info and I havent heard anyone talking trash once again you have been mislead.

[jason]

bulldawg89:
Actually Jason, unless our school board and UIL is lieing...that is how it works...actually thats not how it works..cutoff numbers arent used, its a scale using the number of classes (six-man through 5A) and the number of school in texas...the cutoff # just happens to be the last school in each step of the scale....read a book or something...LEARN....

FOR EXAMPLE:
there are 6 classes (6 man thru 5A)
say there are 6,000 schools in texas
the bottom 1000 enrollment schools will be 6man
the next 1000 will be 1A
the enxt 1000 will be 2A
and so on and so on

those arent exactly the right numbers but thats how they do it
they just decide how to make it as equal as possible in each classification
(there might be some exceptions for 6 man but im not sure)

[kaorder1999]

nobody will know what the UIL is doing until Feb....its the best kept secret around

[jason]

kaorder1999:
nobody will know what the UIL is doing until Feb....its the best kept secret aroundyes, you're right...BUT, there is a method to the madness that is dividing up Classifications....

[crabman]

At the last realignment 3A was squeezed a little bit to help narrow the disparity from the largest to the smallest. Most of the classifications had about 225-227 schools. 3A only had 207. Even squeezing the classification 3A still went from somewhere around 344-898. This is the widest disparity among all of the classifications except 1A and that is because some of the smaller schools get really, really small. By the way I checked back on some of the posts at the beginning of the month and everyone swore that Burnet turned in 946. Until Mr. UIL logs on here and posts official numbers on Feb. 4th, I will doubt anything I read.

[3afan]

the actual process has been posted here many times, someone not as lazy as me might want to search for it ... all i'll say about it is - oh never mind .....

[Burnet Dawg06]

crabman:
At the last realignment 3A was squeezed a little bit to help narrow the disparity from the largest to the smallest. Most of the classifications had about 225-227 schools. 3A only had 207. Even squeezing the classification 3A still went from somewhere around 344-898. This is the widest disparity among all of the classifications except 1A and that is because some of the smaller schools get really, really small. By the way I checked back on some of the posts at the beginning of the month and everyone swore that Burnet turned in 946. Until Mr. UIL logs on here and posts official numbers on Feb. 4th, I will doubt anything I read.Yeah I thought that we turned in 946 also...I don't know where bulldawg89 is getting his info from...

[mustang04]

bulldawg89.....i dont care if yall are 3A or 4A...it doesnt matter to me, i know my team would still love to play yall, in fact, i HOPE yall stay 3A, so yall can have some wake-up calls and realize that you're not EVERYTHING, and THEN go to 4A

[Burnet Dawg06]

Nobody ever said Burnet was EVERYTHING

[mustang04]

u might not have personally, but throughout the whole season, alot of ppl have bragged too much, yeah i respect yalls team, and i wish yall good luck and health, but i love my team too, and I think that we are really good but i dont say they can do alot of stuff until they've done it, , but yall are a good team theres no doubting that, that shipley kid is one hec of a receiver and will make Texas proud at that All American thing, sry if u think i was "DAWGIN" yall which i wasnt, i just dont like teams that are real arrogant

[wildstangs]

Burnet isn't going to be near as dominant next year regardless of which classification they are in. NOBODY knows now, and will learn in February when the rest of us do.

[3afan2K3]

Burnet Dawg06:
Nobody ever said Burnet was EVERYTHINGThere have been many times where people from BURNET said they could be in the top 15 in 4A and 5A

[Burnet Dawg06]

Yeah I understand that but it wasn't just people from Burnet saying that, it was other people too

[3afan2K3]

Burnet Dawg06:
Yeah I understand that but it wasn't just people from Burnet saying that, it was other people tooOK maybe some people from Buchanan Dam, but alot from Burnet

[bevo]

Burnet Dawg06:

crabman:
At the last realignment 3A was squeezed a little bit to help narrow the disparity from the largest to the smallest. Most of the classifications had about 225-227 schools. 3A only had 207. Even squeezing the classification 3A still went from somewhere around 344-898. This is the widest disparity among all of the classifications except 1A and that is because some of the smaller schools get really, really small. By the way I checked back on some of the posts at the beginning of the month and everyone swore that Burnet turned in 946. Until Mr. UIL logs on here and posts official numbers on Feb. 4th, I will doubt anything I read.Yeah I thought that we turned in 946 also...I don't know where bulldawg89 is getting his info from...Hey dawg06...you guys sure have jumped quite a lot since Feb. 2003...at 946?

University Interscholastic League
2003-2004 Football
and
2003-2004 Basketball District Alignment
Conference 3A

District 25
Bandera 774
Burnet 858
Ingram Moore 506
Liberty Hill 464
Llano 491
Wimberley 603

[44INAROW]

bulldawg89:
i just wanted everyone to know that Burnet remains 3A by "3" students!!! Cut off was 947, we got 944 :D

So to all those people talking trash because they think we should be 4A...UMmmm TOO BAD! Yall still have another few years With us!What's the matter 89 - don't wanna play with the big boys?

[3afan2K3]

bevo:

Burnet Dawg06:

crabman:
At the last realignment 3A was squeezed a little bit to help narrow the disparity from the largest to the smallest. Most of the classifications had about 225-227 schools. 3A only had 207. Even squeezing the classification 3A still went from somewhere around 344-898. This is the widest disparity among all of the classifications except 1A and that is because some of the smaller schools get really, really small. By the way I checked back on some of the posts at the beginning of the month and everyone swore that Burnet turned in 946. Until Mr. UIL logs on here and posts official numbers on Feb. 4th, I will doubt anything I read.Yeah I thought that we turned in 946 also...I don't know where bulldawg89 is getting his info from...Hey dawg06...you guys sure have jumped quite a lot since Feb. 2003...at 946?

University Interscholastic League
2003-2004 Football
and
2003-2004 Basketball District Alignment
Conference 3A

District 25
Bandera 774
Burnet 858
Ingram Moore 506
Liberty Hill 464
Llano 491
Wimberley 603ummmmm no

[CentralTxFan]

Those were also the SAME numbers used for the 2002-2003 football/basketball/softball/volleyball/baseball/and track year. The UIL numbers are for 2 years, but I am sure you knew that bevo!

[bevo]

CentralTxFan:
Those were also the SAME numbers used for the 2002-2003 football/basketball/softball/volleyball/baseball/and track year. The UIL numbers are for 2 years, but I am sure you knew that bevo!I did...

[CentralTxFan]

That means it took Burnet 2 years to add less than 100 kids if the numbers on this board are correct. Seems about the same as a bunch of schools did for the last realignment. Plus I saw somewhere on this board Bandera turned in a little over 900. A much bigger jump than Burnet.

[JHS_c/o_06']

wildstangs:
Burnet isn't going to be near as dominant next year regardless of which classification they are in. NOBODY knows now, and will learn in February when the rest of us do.Not to disrespect any teams. But your right, Burnet will not be as dominant, because after this year, they get cycled. Their best player (mcgee and shiply and many others) who are seniors will graduate. But regardless of what happens next year. This is burnets year. But just to warn the ppl from burnet. Dont let the fact that you are the top 3a team go to your head. That was Jaspers downfall last year. But lets just focus on this year and when next year comes along...we will worry about it then. While Burnet is state bound this year, so are the Jasper Bulldogs, and we WILL fight you for it. But good luck to all the teams left and lets hope all the teams can finish the season without injury.

[sahen]

crabman:
At the last realignment 3A was squeezed a little bit to help narrow the disparity from the largest to the smallest. Most of the classifications had about 225-227 schools. 3A only had 207. Even squeezing the classification 3A still went from somewhere around 344-898. This is the widest disparity among all of the classifications except 1A and that is because some of the smaller schools get really, really small. By the way I checked back on some of the posts at the beginning of the month and everyone swore that Burnet turned in 946. Until Mr. UIL logs on here and posts official numbers on Feb. 4th, I will doubt anything I read.um....and the disparity between 5a schools is the largest....not 1a....acoording to collier-sharp a 5a school has to have around 1900 kids to be 5a..(not exact number just around that area there are schools much smaller that are 5a but remember u can play up a classification if ur school wants too)....some 5a highschools have almost 4500 kids in it (Converse Judsons, The Woodlands, Plano all have around 4500) one school, Plano East has 5481...if they played someone with 2000 kids that is a bigger difference than any 1a or 3a game would have....just pointing out...5a is the biggest difference....