PDA

View Full Version : Cowboys vs Eagles



Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 06:51 PM
NFC East Championship Game...

Go Cowboys!

http://www.picgifs.com/smileys/smileys-and-emoticons/praying/smileys-praying-554778.gif

Old Tiger
12-29-2013, 06:57 PM
first

regaleagle
12-29-2013, 07:55 PM
NFC East Championship Game...

Go Cowboys!

http://www.picgifs.com/smileys/smileys-and-emoticons/praying/smileys-praying-554778.gif

YEP....this is what it's come down to nowadays for the Boyz, that's for sure, haha.

regaleagle
12-29-2013, 07:58 PM
Guess what my brother says about tonite's game....nothing, zilch, zero, haha!! I reckon it ain't worth gettin' all in a tither over anymore, LOL.

regaleagle
12-29-2013, 08:24 PM
Okay, my brother finally said something.....the problem is their defense. He says Lee is out and Ware is playing injured, and they paid too much for Mo Claiborne, so Romo being out don't really matter. He says they ain't got nobody in their right mind that knows how to draft....that JJ is an idiot, haha. You should hear him spouting now. Now he's talking about Romo getting a $108 m contract, and says he would've signed for $50 m, but JJ is off his rocker, LOL. He says Nick Foles shows you don't have to have a $100m qb to get a quality one. Says Romo wasn't going anywhere at his age for $50m, but JJ and his draftheads are nutcases....LMAO, haha.

Saggy Aggie
12-29-2013, 08:26 PM
Time to watch the cowpies lose :)

And if by some strange chance they do win, it'll be even better to see FF's response... Haha

Eagle 1
12-29-2013, 08:28 PM
So are the romo-sexuals hoping the Cowboys lose?
Just wondering.

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 08:37 PM
Blame Orton for the fumble right?

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 08:37 PM
Damn...:foul:

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 08:43 PM
That was DeMarco's first lost fumble of year...

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 08:54 PM
F'ing JG. 3rd and 2 , Maury is ballin and that's the play they run. That's why I hate JG.

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 08:57 PM
This D cannot get off the field on 3rd down

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 09:00 PM
No way this d can hold up.

Phil C
12-29-2013, 09:01 PM
The December meltdown continues another year.

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 09:04 PM
Heath is not an nfl player.

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 09:06 PM
Heath is not an nfl player.

He's horrible.

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 09:07 PM
Philly had gains of 17, 12, 20, 20 & 22 on that drive

Saggy Aggie
12-29-2013, 09:10 PM
Heath is not an nfl player.

Well he did make a TD saving tackle on McCoy in open field while McCoy had a full head of steam.

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 09:12 PM
Another 3rd and 2 pass! :foul:

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 09:14 PM
Philly has run 16 plays. Eagles have 7 plays of 10+ and 4 plays of 20+

Old Tiger
12-29-2013, 09:15 PM
Going to go out on a limb here and blame Tony Romo's wife for this loss.

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 09:17 PM
Gotta get some points here.

Nice stop by the d.

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 09:22 PM
There we go!

83Indian
12-29-2013, 09:24 PM
Nice drive. Defense and Ware need to step it up. At home with the crowd behind you.

full circle
12-29-2013, 09:25 PM
turnover!!!!

Old Tiger
12-29-2013, 09:29 PM
Lesean McCoy cuts like Barry Sanders.

Saggy Aggie
12-29-2013, 09:36 PM
Orton is getting it done lol

Saggy Aggie
12-29-2013, 09:39 PM
Lol and then witten gives them an int

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 09:39 PM
Turnovers...:dispntd:

83Indian
12-29-2013, 09:40 PM
Just like that, the defense lays an egg

Old Tiger
12-29-2013, 09:40 PM
Can y'all believe how big of a asshole that Tony Romo is? Telling his best friend Witten to not make Orton look so good!

Old Tiger
12-29-2013, 09:41 PM
The Fake ESPN ‏@TheFakeESPN 43s
Tony Romo angrily throws remote at TV, gets intercepted by his 1-year-old son.

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 09:42 PM
Lol and then witten gives them an int

If it were romo then it's a bad throw, huh?

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 09:42 PM
The Fake ESPN ‏@TheFakeESPN 43s
Tony Romo angrily throws remote at TV, gets intercepted by his 1-year-old son.

If you think hats funny, you have no sense of humor.

Old Tiger
12-29-2013, 09:43 PM
If you think hats funny, you have no sense of humor.

Sad your 'Boys are losing? It's okay, maybe next year!

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 09:49 PM
Non cowboy fans that come into a cowboys game thread to talk trash are beyond pathetic.

Old Tiger
12-29-2013, 09:51 PM
Non cowboy fans that come into a cowboys game thread to talk trash are beyond pathetic.
http://iconizer.net/files/classic_smileys_set/thumb/128/crying.png

83Indian
12-29-2013, 09:52 PM
Well it's closer than I thought it would be. Offensive line is playing well. If the defense can't get pressure on foles, I'm afraid we have no chance to outscore them

Bullaholic
12-29-2013, 09:53 PM
As long as the Cowboys don't get a lead, they'll be fine...:D Watch em' pull this one out.

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 10:00 PM
The turnovers are just killers right now. Could have the lead.

Cam
12-29-2013, 10:01 PM
Cowboys need a turnover to start the 3rd.....

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 10:07 PM
Way to go D.

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:07 PM
Good pressure that series. Need a score on this drive

regaleagle
12-29-2013, 10:07 PM
Speaking of laying eggs, sometimes even chickens can have a good day. Let's hope the egg-laying subsides in the 2nd half.

Cam
12-29-2013, 10:09 PM
my daughter is at the game...just sent me a pic of her seat....she's way up there!....1st time there, she's happy!

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:16 PM
Dez has to get that.

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 10:17 PM
FGs will not win the game

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:17 PM
Come on defensive line. Foles is not good when pressured

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 10:17 PM
Dez has to get that.

Philly secondary does not look lost on jump balls LOL

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 10:23 PM
There's that turnover...:clap:

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:23 PM
Haha. Foles is bad under pressure. Keep it up D

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 10:25 PM
Check down Orton and another FG

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 10:25 PM
Boo...

Cam
12-29-2013, 10:27 PM
does Miles Austin even play anymore?.......Oh wait, I just saw him on the field....wonder if he runs his routes full speed anymore knowing the ball isn't coming his way?.....:doh:

Bullaholic
12-29-2013, 10:28 PM
Dangit...Throw it in the end zone and take your chances. There is no next week....

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:30 PM
Way to go defense

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 10:32 PM
D is playing balls out..need O to do same

Cam
12-29-2013, 10:32 PM
Dangit...Throw it in the end zone and take your chances. There is no next week....


........O ye of little faith........:spitlol:

Cam
12-29-2013, 10:33 PM
time to throw the dang ball down the middle of the field!!!!

Bullaholic
12-29-2013, 10:34 PM
........O ye of little faith........:spitlol:

.......More, O ye of little score....

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:35 PM
Offense is just ugly

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:38 PM
Need a stop badly

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 10:38 PM
Orton's last 3 completions have been 1,1 and -1

Bullaholic
12-29-2013, 10:38 PM
Amazing...Carter blew a coverage...

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 10:42 PM
Wow...

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:45 PM
Gotta like chip Kelly's style. Big play for dallas

Cam
12-29-2013, 10:45 PM
....I smell a big play coming......:eek:

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 10:51 PM
Geez...are you kidding me!

Txbroadcaster
12-29-2013, 10:51 PM
We see now it is not Romo who will not run the ball on short yardage situations

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 10:52 PM
Run the gd ball!

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:52 PM
The defense is going to have to score

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 10:56 PM
@theunticket: Now it's obvious that abandoning the run has nothing to do with Romo

Phil C
12-29-2013, 10:56 PM
The Cowboys are playing a good game but they will still find a way to choke again.

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:57 PM
Need a turnover

83Indian
12-29-2013, 10:59 PM
Put in Kitna

Macarthur
12-29-2013, 11:00 PM
One coach knows how to run the football late in games.

regaleagle
12-29-2013, 11:04 PM
Cowboys make that 1st and its a different ballgame. But alas, no confidence in the run from the OC.

Now everything they do with be too little too late.

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 11:10 PM
Yes!!

regaleagle
12-29-2013, 11:12 PM
Now it comes down to the Dallas D again to get the stop.

SintonFan_inAustin
12-29-2013, 11:14 PM
who calls these plays? HC or does the cowboys have a OF?

full circle
12-29-2013, 11:14 PM
a back shoulder is not high percentage enough to run on 4th down or for a 2 pt play

Bullaholic
12-29-2013, 11:16 PM
a back shoulder is not high percentage enough to run on 4th down or for a 2 pt play

And did anybody in the house not know what was coming?

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 11:17 PM
Huge stop.

Here we go...

Bullaholic
12-29-2013, 11:17 PM
He comes/goes the season, folks....

83Indian
12-29-2013, 11:19 PM
What is baileys range? 55

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 11:20 PM
Lol...

83Indian
12-29-2013, 11:20 PM
That had to be Romo

Bullaholic
12-29-2013, 11:20 PM
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhh.......See you next season...

SintonFan_inAustin
12-29-2013, 11:21 PM
Cowboys are just cursed, doesn't matter who's the qb

83Indian
12-29-2013, 11:23 PM
If we could have got this defensive effort more often, this game wouldn't matter

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 11:23 PM
Third year in a row...

SintonFan_inAustin
12-29-2013, 11:25 PM
If we could have got this defensive effort more often, this game wouldn't matterthis is how it has been for us Cowboy fans, heartbreaking losses every season for awhile now.


we'll give it another shot next season

full circle
12-29-2013, 11:28 PM
I was just about to say you can't blame romo....

Cam
12-29-2013, 11:30 PM
...what happened?....what did I miss?........my wife said it was a pick.....was Tony in the game?.....I missed it!...was having a diarrhea attack in the crapper!.....dammit!.......

Tejastrue
12-29-2013, 11:31 PM
http://www.myemoticons.com/images/emotions/disappointed/shoot-me.gif

bobcat1
12-29-2013, 11:43 PM
That had to be Romo

Nope just another of many passes thrown behind receivers this year. Dallas D did a great job most of the game setting the edge keeping McCoy contained and he still got 130 yards. Dallas D with 18 different D Lineman this year. No telling how many linebackers. Horrible season play calling by Callahan and Red. Both should be fired. I like the special teams guy though.

Roughneck93
12-29-2013, 11:50 PM
:twitch:

http://i1108.photobucket.com/albums/h419/trueblue74/5f24d98d1a4358419422a28dfa8b37a1.jpg

Old Tiger
12-29-2013, 11:58 PM
Regardless if Romo played tonight or not that game was going to end like that for the Cowboys.

Macarthur
12-30-2013, 12:02 AM
Regardless if Romo played tonight or not that game was going to end like that for the Cowboys.

:dispntd:

Old Tiger
12-30-2013, 12:03 AM
:dispntd:

I'm fairly certain history says it would have.

83Indian
12-30-2013, 12:17 AM
Regardless if Romo played tonight or not that game was going to end like that for the Cowboys.

Agreed. Philly would have hung 40 on us if Romo played

full circle
12-30-2013, 12:22 AM
firing garret is not the answer, we are knocking on the door 3 years in a row, i think garret is a good coach, we need to keep on going as painful as it has been, it was the same in the 60's, stay he course and we will break through.

full circle
12-30-2013, 12:24 AM
we win if romo plays

Old Tiger
12-30-2013, 12:30 AM
firing garret is not the answer, we are knocking on the door 3 years in a row, i think garret is a good coach, we need to keep on going as painful as it has been, it was the same in the 60's, stay he course and we will break through.

I don't think Garrett is a good coach, He's an average to below average coach. He makes terrible decisions.


Regardless of who the Cowboys coach is they will continue to be average at best but perennially below average due to one man, Jerry Jones.

I can't think of a successful coach who would want to come to Dallas anymore because they will have no control of their team due to Jerry. Parcells was the last and only worked for a few seasons but Jerry had to take HIS team back.

Old Tiger
12-30-2013, 12:30 AM
we win if romo plays

1-6 in week 17 or later elimination games says otherwise.

Txbroadcaster
12-30-2013, 12:36 AM
I don't think Garrett is a good coach, He's an average to below average coach. He makes terrible decisions.


Regardless of who the Cowboys coach is they will continue to be average at best but perennially below average due to one man, Jerry Jones.

I can't think of a successful coach who would want to come to Dallas anymore because they will have no control of their team due to Jerry. Parcells was the last and only worked for a few seasons but Jerry had to take HIS team back.


Jones would not pay the crazy amount Parcells wanted after not winning a play off game..If Garrett asked for same thing everyone would agree with Jones

Saggy Aggie
12-30-2013, 01:39 AM
Even Texan fans like me sit back and laugh :)

GrTigers6
12-30-2013, 06:12 AM
1-6 in week 17 or later elimination games says otherwise.

It apparently doesn't matter who the qb is Cowboys are 2-12 in final games of the season since 2000

D'Highlander
12-30-2013, 08:07 AM
Ssdd

Farmersfan
12-30-2013, 09:06 AM
we win if romo plays


Since 2006 Tony Romo has a 73 QB rating in elimination games. Kyle Orton had a 85 QB rating last night. Just like when Romo plays it is the QB turnovers that kill the opportunity for a win. Although I will say that ANYBODY who watched Orton last night that doesn't think he would have been able to lead this team to a 8-8 record just like Romo did really doesn't know much about football. This has been my point all along. This Cowboy team has been a .500 team for the last 20 years. They were .500 through Quincy Carter, Chad Hutchenson, Drew Brees and any other NO-NAME or HAS-BEEN QB you want to name that has played for the Cowboys. Yet Tony Romo is the only one of all these 20 years worth of QBs that got stamped "FRANCHISE" and got paid a bizillion dollars..... They guarantee him 55 million for repeated 8-8 seasons when they could have gotten the same out of any number of 1 million a year QBs. I don't pretend to know what young up and comer would be better for Dallas but I will say that i know for a fact they won't get better at that position unless they try to get better at that position. The sad part about all this is next season we have to will the fresh young superstar rookie in Houston set the world on fire and we will still be trudging along at 8-8............. :hairpunk:

buff4ever
12-30-2013, 11:37 AM
I have not dove in to the ongoing romo saga this season much because it would be the same old chit from the romosexuals, and quite frankly with the injuries our defense was just that bad.

What I would say about the season finale is that our defense stepped up all we could have asked them to last night for what they were playing with. The sad part of it all, even though he threw a pick on the final drive when a field goal would have been enough, Orton did prove he could be productive with this offense, and I agree with FF that he probably could have done about as well as romo did. He would have atleast matched the 8-8 record. Am I saying Orton should be our starting qb over romo? NO. Am I saying that romo is worth the money that JJ threw at him? Hell NO. Am I saying that the team should try and get someone else to become the qb of the cowboys? Hell YES. If the cowboys are going to remain 8-8 for a few more years, they may as well let orton have it, trade off romo and beef up other postitions. This would solve a lot of money problems, not to mention if orton had practiced with first team and got timing down a little better, he may have pulled last night off. He was just a little behind on several passes last night, including the final int.

I have to admit, I thought that they were going to get in field goal range and win that game last night, which was going to shock the world, and make me laugh quite frankly. Then the INT deflated me. But I agree with FF, all that game did was prove that Orton could do what Romo does with this team; so maybe he should make the big bucks too, or maybe we should have never paid romo the big contract to begin with. I think we all know which scenario should be.

To restart the romo saga, You now have Kitna and Orton, two not mega quarterbacks that have played as well or better than romo with our offense. So despite romo's high points, he is apparently very average at best over all, and IN MY OPINION less than average in big pressure games. He plays well with his high points when it doesn't matter or he isn't expected to win (Denver this year), but becomes average or worse when the season is on the line or the pressure is on.

Macarthur
12-30-2013, 11:53 AM
Tired argument.

If the defense had played consistently this year like they did last night, this team is an 11 game winner.

Romo put up more than 30points in multiple losses this year. This defense was bad on an unprecedented level. Yet all some can talk about is how we gotta get rid of Romo.

Txbroadcaster
12-30-2013, 12:03 PM
Tired argument.

If the defense had played consistently this year like they did last night, this team is an 11 game winner.

Romo put up more than 30points in multiple losses this year. This defense was bad on an unprecedented level. Yet all some can talk about is how we gotta get rid of Romo.

I honestly will never understand the perception that every Cowboy loss is on Romo..and I am talking about people who I feel know football, but for whatever reason the hate for him is so strong they cannot see pass him.

YTBulldogs
12-30-2013, 12:20 PM
If ball thrown to Witten on conversion, Boy's still playing. Witten wide open (7 yard pass) after his push off method on LB on 2-pt winning play. Yet, it's thrown out wide, 20 yards away, with tough angle. smh.

GrTigers6
12-30-2013, 12:21 PM
I hate to break it to you Romo haters but our Defense was bad in week 1 I believe they gave up 500 yards to a bad giants team. Really and yall want to cry injuries as to why this defense sucked? That is pretty bad hatred for Romo

GrTigers6
12-30-2013, 12:22 PM
If ball thrown to Witten on conversion, Boy's still playing. Witten wide open after his push off method on LB on 2-pt winning play. Yet, it's thrown out wide. smh.

No ortons INT would have given them a way to kick winning field goal :D

YTBulldogs
12-30-2013, 12:26 PM
No ortons INT would have given them a way to kick winning field goal :D

Probably true. That D would not of held that lead had conversion been good.

SintonFan_inAustin
12-30-2013, 12:34 PM
Probably true. That D would not of held that lead had conversion been good.This is so true.

SintonFan_inAustin
12-30-2013, 12:36 PM
My brother had just called me to say Orton was better than Romo and when he finished saying that Orton throws the pick to end the game and bad part was my tv was ahead of his by about 30 secs so he didn't believe me at first that he just jinx him.

Macarthur
12-30-2013, 12:48 PM
Also the offense Orton was playing is not the same as Romo. Can't make any comparison.

OldBison75
12-30-2013, 02:01 PM
There are 11 players on the field at a time for the Cowboys. If a play fails to produce, or causes a turnover, it is generally the fault of more than one player. The reality is that no one player can be blamed for the Cowboys woes. This is a team that needs a complete rebuild from the general manager on down. Several of the current players would probably be pro bowlers anywhere else, but the Cowboy culture created by Jerry Jones will never let them be a part of a championship team here.

As for the Romo-Orton argument, Orton played very well and gave the Cowboys a shot a winning last night. But, was he any better when the game was on the line? It is funny that the Romo haters say that the fault lies with Garrett and play calling. Garrett called the same type plays all year for Romo and the mistakes were all Romo's fault. The reality is that all of the offensive failures were from lack of execution from a lot of people.

Defensively, this team was awful all year. They played last night with more emotion and effort than they have in a long time. However, they still have not been consistent all year.

New GM, new coach, and same players could be contenders, but until the team mindset gets fixed there will be no success.

Farmersfan
12-30-2013, 04:00 PM
Tired argument.

If the defense had played consistently this year like they did last night, this team is an 11 game winner.

Romo put up more than 30points in multiple losses this year. This defense was bad on an unprecedented level. Yet all some can talk about is how we gotta get rid of Romo.


Actually there were 3 games lost when Romo scored 30 or more points. And 2 of the 3 were lost on Romo late game interceptions........................

Farmersfan
12-30-2013, 04:17 PM
I honestly will never understand the perception that every Cowboy loss is on Romo..and I am talking about people who I feel know football, but for whatever reason the hate for him is so strong they cannot see pass him.


I can't imagine anyone has ever said "every loss is on Romo". I certainly wouldn't agree that person has much football knowledge if they did say that. But a portion of every loss is on Romo and that cannot be denied. How much or how little of the blame really goes to Romo depends on how things play out on the field. What so many of you guys do on a consistent basis is like blaming the pit crew for a race car driver not winning. Of course the pit crew has a lot to do with it but ultimately the driver is the one that makes it work on the track. Most of you guys didn't see the things I saw on the field from Orton last night. Or at least you aren't mentioning it. Orton isn't near as athletic or gifted as Romo is but Orton CONTROLLED the defense of the Eagles. They tried blitzing their butts off and never once got to him. The 0-line played well but primarily Orton didn't allow them to get on him. He got rid of the ball quickly and made quick decisions. He read the defense and called the proper audiable. He also made some throws that Romo has been missing a lot lately. His throw over the top to Williams and the bullet to Witten for about 40 were excellent throws and deserve praise. He missed Dez over the top several times and maybe I'm seeing something that isn't there but it seemed to me Dez wasn't fighting for position or running very hard on those routes. I was also stunned at the fact that NEVER in this game did it come down to Orton in a panic trying to get the snap with the play clock running out. Seems like Romo always takes the play close down the very last tick so often the defense doesn't have to time the snap they can simply time the play clock. Would Orton have kept this team in the game against Denver? No way! But they lost that game anyway! Would he have scored as many overall points as Romo or had as high a passer rating as Romo? Probably not. But I think Orton would do just enough for this team to win 8 games and isn't that exactly what they did with Romo?

Macarthur
12-30-2013, 05:00 PM
Actually there were 3 games lost when Romo scored 30 or more points. And 2 of the 3 were lost on Romo late game interceptions........................

The point is that when your offense has scored 30 points, you shouldn't have to time after time still win the game on the final drive.

Bullaholic
12-30-2013, 05:08 PM
Wonder why the Cowboys didn't put in a special 2-pt conversion play this week for just the situation they found themselves in. Maybe a back shoulder fade fake to Dez and have him spin and go to the back corner up high or some variation like that. The Eagle corner read that play all the way and made the play on the attempt and it was the diff between losing and possible OT.

Eagle 1
12-30-2013, 05:13 PM
Wonder why the Cowboys didn't put in a special 2-pt conversion play this week for just the situation they found themselves in. Maybe a back shoulder fade fake to Dez and have him spin and go to the back corner up high or some variation like that. The Eagle corner read that play all the way and made the play on the attempt and it was the diff between losing and possible OT.

They should have ran the ball.

Macarthur
12-30-2013, 05:14 PM
Wonder why the Cowboys didn't put in a special 2-pt conversion play this week for just the situation they found themselves in. Maybe a back shoulder fade fake to Dez and have him spin and go to the back corner up high or some variation like that. The Eagle corner read that play all the way and made the play on the attempt and it was the diff between losing and possible OT.

Escobar and witten were both wide open.

GrTigers6
12-30-2013, 06:22 PM
Wonder why the Cowboys didn't put in a special 2-pt conversion play this week for just the situation they found themselves in. Maybe a back shoulder fade fake to Dez and have him spin and go to the back corner up high or some variation like that. The Eagle corner read that play all the way and made the play on the attempt and it was the diff between losing and possible OT.
There was still 4 minutes left in the game at that point. Suprising enough the defense held but it may have been different if it was a tie game

cougartino
12-30-2013, 06:31 PM
Did anyone on TV or the league ever speak about the speedy play clock that cost us 5 yards?

buff4ever
12-31-2013, 09:46 AM
Did anyone on TV or the league ever speak about the speedy play clock that cost us 5 yards?

They would have only allowed that to be a story if we didn't score on that series. Since we did, it became mute, but that was crazy. Everyone in that stadium and watching on tv knew that was too quick.

buff4ever
12-31-2013, 09:48 AM
I can't imagine anyone has ever said "every loss is on Romo". I certainly wouldn't agree that person has much football knowledge if they did say that. But a portion of every loss is on Romo and that cannot be denied. How much or how little of the blame really goes to Romo depends on how things play out on the field. What so many of you guys do on a consistent basis is like blaming the pit crew for a race car driver not winning. Of course the pit crew has a lot to do with it but ultimately the driver is the one that makes it work on the track. Most of you guys didn't see the things I saw on the field from Orton last night. Or at least you aren't mentioning it. Orton isn't near as athletic or gifted as Romo is but Orton CONTROLLED the defense of the Eagles. They tried blitzing their butts off and never once got to him. The 0-line played well but primarily Orton didn't allow them to get on him. He got rid of the ball quickly and made quick decisions. He read the defense and called the proper audiable. He also made some throws that Romo has been missing a lot lately. His throw over the top to Williams and the bullet to Witten for about 40 were excellent throws and deserve praise. He missed Dez over the top several times and maybe I'm seeing something that isn't there but it seemed to me Dez wasn't fighting for position or running very hard on those routes. I was also stunned at the fact that NEVER in this game did it come down to Orton in a panic trying to get the snap with the play clock running out. Seems like Romo always takes the play close down the very last tick so often the defense doesn't have to time the snap they can simply time the play clock. Would Orton have kept this team in the game against Denver? No way! But they lost that game anyway! Would he have scored as many overall points as Romo or had as high a passer rating as Romo? Probably not. But I think Orton would do just enough for this team to win 8 games and isn't that exactly what they did with Romo?

Not much of anything can be disputed here. The line did play well, and with more time all year this year, I didn't see romo's play improve that much from last year. Maybe I am starting to pick a little much here.

Farmersfan
12-31-2013, 09:51 AM
The point is that when your offense has scored 30 points, you shouldn't have to time after time still win the game on the final drive.


#1. There were 3 games out of a 16 game season. Not time after time.

#2. There were 45 games in just the first 6 weeks of the season where the winner scored 30 points or more. I stopped counting because I assume you get the point. 30 points is not that unusual in the NFL and about half the games each week end up with the winner scoring more than 30. The AVERAGE NFL score this season was 24 points.

Farmersfan
12-31-2013, 09:59 AM
Not much of anything can be disputed here. The line did play well, and with more time all year this year, I didn't see romo's play improve that much from last year. Maybe I am starting to pick a little much here.

We have been consistently informed that without Romo this O-line would give up far more sacks. I showed time after time after time how the Dallas O-line was right in the middle of the pack in sacks allowed and most other measurables for offensive lines yet it was always the O-line's fault. Jon Kitna went in and played 7 games as well as Romo and didn't get sacked any more and now Kyle Orton faced one of the toughest pass rushes in the NFL and didn't get touched. In fact going into this game everybody was talking about how Orton was NOT a mobile QB and wouldn't be able to escape the pass rush like Romo does and all Orton did was avoid getting touched by the defense and actually ran for half of Romo's season total in a single game.

1st and goal
12-31-2013, 10:02 AM
Dualing Romo threads.
Meh.

Old Tiger
12-31-2013, 10:11 AM
They would have only allowed that to be a story if we didn't score on that series. Since we did, it became mute, but that was crazy. Everyone in that stadium and watching on tv knew that was too quick.

moot*

GrTigers6
12-31-2013, 10:16 AM
We have been consistently informed that without Romo this O-line would give up far more sacks. I showed time after time after time how the Dallas O-line was right in the middle of the pack in sacks allowed and most other measurables for offensive lines yet it was always the O-line's fault. Jon Kitna went in and played 7 games as well as Romo and didn't get sacked any more and now Kyle Orton faced one of the toughest pass rushes in the NFL and didn't get touched. In fact going into this game everybody was talking about how Orton was NOT a mobile QB and wouldn't be able to escape the pass rush like Romo does and all Orton did was avoid getting touched by the defense and actually ran for half of Romo's season total in a single game.

That is really sad Farmersfan. Orton has 1 carry for 8 yards and Romo has 20 carries for 38 yards but that one carry almost equals room. Ok whatever. ANd also of course you don't mention the 2 interceptions and countless missed passes that Orton had. Very Typical

buff4ever
12-31-2013, 10:38 AM
That is really sad Farmersfan. Orton has 1 carry for 8 yards and Romo has 20 carries for 38 yards but that one carry almost equals room. Ok whatever. ANd also of course you don't mention the 2 interceptions and countless missed passes that Orton had. Very Typical

What is typical GrTigers is that you always miss the point, the point he was making is that romo is said to be so mobile and a play maker, and yet orton went untouched and showed that he could gain more yards in a season than romo. Granted, romo uses his mobility to avoid sacks and make throws down field. But where has that gotten us, when orton has proved he can find the open receiver quicker and avoid sacks as well. And our opinion is that orton could have led this team to an 8 - 8 record this year just as romo did.

Let's spin this and I will play for Orton the way you romosexuals do for Romo. If orton were our qb and we replaceed 3 defensive backs with pro bowlers and traded for 2 new pro bowl linebackers I think Orton could take this team to 12- 4 and be a super bowl contender. In fact trade romo because apparently he is that awesome, surely someone would take him even for the money we gave him, and we could pick up some of those defensive spots. I bet we would win a couple extra games next year.

Macarthur
12-31-2013, 10:44 AM
We have been consistently informed that without Romo this O-line would give up far more sacks. I showed time after time after time how the Dallas O-line was right in the middle of the pack in sacks allowed and most other measurables for offensive lines yet it was always the O-line's fault. Jon Kitna went in and played 7 games as well as Romo and didn't get sacked any more and now Kyle Orton faced one of the toughest pass rushes in the NFL and didn't get touched. In fact going into this game everybody was talking about how Orton was NOT a mobile QB and wouldn't be able to escape the pass rush like Romo does and all Orton did was avoid getting touched by the defense and actually ran for half of Romo's season total in a single game.

This OL was much improved over the last couple of years. Not comparable. And anyone could see that the offense with orton was intent on getting the ball out very fast. He was checking down a lot as that game went on.

Macarthur
12-31-2013, 10:46 AM
Not much of anything can be disputed here. The line did play well, and with more time all year this year, I didn't see romo's play improve that much from last year. Maybe I am starting to pick a little much here.

Really? He had a fantastic year and had a bad back for most if not all year.

Macarthur
12-31-2013, 10:52 AM
Not much of anything can be disputed here. The line did play well, and with more time all year this year, I didn't see romo's play improve that much from last year. Maybe I am starting to pick a little much here.

Wow. This is a perfect example of how strange it is being a cowboy fan.

How many fan bases would be even considering the merits of their QB when he ends the year with a 97 passer rating, 31 TDs and 10 ints and almost 4000 yards?

SintonFan_inAustin
12-31-2013, 10:58 AM
Really? He had a fantastic year and had a bad back for most if not all year.you'll get no support from these Romo haters. Orton did good and almost got it done but Romo over Orton any day.

LoL oh my, Cowboys have haters for the Owner, qb and the team.

buff4ever
12-31-2013, 11:01 AM
Wow. This is a perfect example of how strange it is being a cowboy fan.

How many fan bases would be even considering the merits of their QB when he ends the year with a 97 passer rating, 31 TDs and 10 ints and almost 4000 yards?


There is a whole lot of history that comes with romo over the years that out weighs a few stats you throw out. I will agree, if this were his first or third year and those are the stats without the history of flops on his part, we would all be looking forward to next year, but looking forward to next year is what we have done with this guy for too long.

Too many times Mac, you look at things in the moment and block out the whole picture. I don't know if you do this in general, or if you just use this method to try and prove your side of this argument. In this moment of this year, with our defense and romo's stats, even though I still think our offense under performed in many games this year, you probalby win the battle of this year. But we are looking at a career of romo, and we win the war of overall. The reason we are still loud, well I have wanted someone else for years, is because cowboy fans can't ignore his history and think that with a healthy defense we are a super bowl team.

SintonFan_inAustin
12-31-2013, 11:08 AM
There is a whole lot of history that comes with romo over the years that out weighs a few stats you throw out. I will agree, if this were his first or third year and those are the stats without the history of flops on his part, we would all be looking forward to next year, but looking forward to next year is what we have done with this guy for too long.

Too many times Mac, you look at things in the moment and block out the whole picture. I don't know if you do this in general, or if you just use this method to try and prove your side of this argument. In this moment of this year, with our defense and romo's stats, even though I still think our offense under performed in many games this year, you probalby win the battle of this year. But we are looking at a career of romo, and we win the war of overall. The reason we are still loud, well I have wanted someone else for years, is because cowboy fans can't ignore his history and think that with a healthy defense we are a super bowl team.you're blocking out the whole picture also by putting him as a one man team, if the team loses its all his fault when in fact each year Cowboys enter with questions marks in a lot of positions except qb where it's a given he'll produce through out the season. Each year defense and offensive line is a concern and each year there is setbacks in that area.

buff4ever
12-31-2013, 11:18 AM
you're blocking out the whole picture also by putting him as a one man team, if the team loses its all his fault when in fact each year Cowboys enter with questions marks in a lot of positions except qb where it's a given he'll produce through out the season. Each year defense and offensive line is a concern and each year there is setbacks in that area.

There has been many changes made over the course of romo's career. The only constant is romo and his flops and lack of winning the win or go home games. What picture am I missing. I will give you guys this, if you just look at stats and highlights he comes across as a #6 to #8 qb in the league. But if you look at the whole picture, and realize what players and coaches and fans around the nation realize, he falls well short of that mark with all factors on the line.

Eagle 1
12-31-2013, 11:23 AM
buffs, I like your ideal about trading Romo, but I seriously doubt anybody would trade for Romo even if he didn't have a bad back. Maybe Minnesota, they are suckers for used up Cowboy players. LOL...


http://oi42.tinypic.com/2ljrxas.jpg

SintonFan_inAustin
12-31-2013, 11:28 AM
buffs, I like your ideal about trading Romo, but I seriously doubt anybody would trade for Romo even if he didn't have a bad back. Maybe Minnesota, they are suckers for used up Cowboy players. LOL...


http://oi42.tinypic.com/2ljrxas.jpg

Dang that 6th one is being tough but oh well atleast we Cowboy fans have celebrated five times!


http://images1.fanpop.com/images/photos/1800000/5-Super-Bowl-Trophies-dallas-cowboys-1857433-485-375.jpg

buff4ever
12-31-2013, 11:38 AM
buffs, I like your ideal about trading Romo, but I seriously doubt anybody would trade for Romo even if he didn't have a bad back. Maybe Minnesota, they are suckers for used up Cowboy players. LOL...


http://oi42.tinypic.com/2ljrxas.jpg


It really isn't that far fetched or bad of an idea. We get out from under being stuck with him for years to come, and we dump him on some other desperate fools before he is too old for anyone to gamble on.

I just fear, even if we got smart enough to try, that no one is desparate enough to gamble on what his real league perception is out there.

Macarthur
12-31-2013, 12:06 PM
There is a whole lot of history that comes with romo over the years that out weighs a few stats you throw out. I will agree, if this were his first or third year and those are the stats without the history of flops on his part, we would all be looking forward to next year, but looking forward to next year is what we have done with this guy for too long.

Too many times Mac, you look at things in the moment and block out the whole picture. I don't know if you do this in general, or if you just use this method to try and prove your side of this argument. In this moment of this year, with our defense and romo's stats, even though I still think our offense under performed in many games this year, you probalby win the battle of this year. But we are looking at a career of romo, and we win the war of overall. The reason we are still loud, well I have wanted someone else for years, is because cowboy fans can't ignore his history and think that with a healthy defense we are a super bowl team.

Oh, I'm looking at the big picture for sure.

You realize that for all of Romo's career, he's had only one top ten defense. In that year, the team went 13-3 and had the top seed and lost to the SB camps.

One other time he's had a top HALF of the league defense. In that year, they won the division. Won 11 games and got their first playoff victory in many years.

What this clearly means is that if you give Romo even a reasonable defense, he will win many games for you. The rest of his time he's had sh*t for a defense and had to carry every team on his back.

Someone else needs to look at the big picture.

Farmersfan
12-31-2013, 03:53 PM
That is really sad Farmersfan. Orton has 1 carry for 8 yards and Romo has 20 carries for 38 yards but that one carry almost equals room. Ok whatever. ANd also of course you don't mention the 2 interceptions and countless missed passes that Orton had. Very Typical


Huh, I did mention those bad throws! And the point is that in the open field Orton looked far, far more mobile than our "MOBILE" QB looks. but all this is old argument! We've discussed this numerous times. I just like seeing some of you guys struggle for air when you know you have been owned on a football forum! :crazy1:

Farmersfan
12-31-2013, 04:02 PM
This OL was much improved over the last couple of years. Not comparable. And anyone could see that the offense with orton was intent on getting the ball out very fast. He was checking down a lot as that game went on.



Orton averaged 6.3 yards per pass play on Sunday and Romo has averaged 7.16 per completion the entire season. That's a difference of about 2 feet..................

Macarthur
12-31-2013, 04:25 PM
Orton averaged 6.3 yards per pass play on Sunday and Romo has averaged 7.16 per completion the entire season. That's a difference of about 2 feet..................

Come on dude. You can't compare one game to an entire season. You understand sample size.

Farmersfan
12-31-2013, 04:36 PM
Oh, I'm looking at the big picture for sure.

You realize that for all of Romo's career, he's had only one top ten defense. In that year, the team went 13-3 and had the top seed and lost to the SB camps.

One other time he's had a top HALF of the league defense. In that year, they won the division. Won 11 games and got their first playoff victory in many years.

What this clearly means is that if you give Romo even a reasonable defense, he will win many games for you. The rest of his time he's had sh*t for a defense and had to carry every team on his back.

Someone else needs to look at the big picture.



Superbowl Champs defensive ranks:

Ravens= #17
Giants= #27
Packers= #5
Saints= #25
Steelers= #1
Giants= #7
Colts= #21
Steelers=#4
Patriots=# 9
Patriots=#7


Romo has had a top 10 defense 3 times in 8 seasons and has managed a single playoff win. He has had a top 15 defense 5 times in 8 years. Romo is barely .500 in that time frame..................His defense has only been below average 3 times in his entire career. but it is true that Romo wins more games with better defenses! Or would that be "better defenses" win more games? :redxpoke:

Farmersfan
12-31-2013, 04:41 PM
Come on dude. You can't compare one game to an entire season. You understand sample size.



And yet you discounted what Orton did by saying the offense was different for him and he was "checking down" more than Romo does.... His checking down certainly appeared to be much more effective than Romo's but I didn't notice him doing it any more often than Romo does. And the stats prove it.............

GrTigers6
12-31-2013, 04:42 PM
Come on dude. You can't compare one game to an entire season. You understand sample size.
He will if he thinks it will work in his dumb argument!:D

full circle
12-31-2013, 04:45 PM
orton did a good job for the most part considering, however, with a chance to win he threw a pick

Macarthur
12-31-2013, 05:31 PM
Superbowl Champs defensive ranks:

Ravens= #17
Giants= #27
Packers= #5
Saints= #25
Steelers= #1
Giants= #7
Colts= #21
Steelers=#4
Patriots=# 9
Patriots=#7


Romo has had a top 10 defense 3 times in 8 seasons and has managed a single playoff win. He has had a top 15 defense 5 times in 8 years. Romo is barely .500 in that time frame..................His defense has only been below average 3 times in his entire career. but it is true that Romo wins more games with better defenses! Or would that be "better defenses" win more games? :redxpoke:

What number are you using, yardage?

I could care less about yardage.

Here are the cowboy defensive rankings in points per game :

2006 - 20
2007 - 13
2008 - 20
2009 - 2
2010 - 23
2011 - 16
2012 - 24
2013 - 26

NFL. Com

Macarthur
12-31-2013, 06:13 PM
And by the way, the year NO won the SB, they were near the top of the league in takeaways. And they were 4th in points scored.

Brees had the 31 st ranked offense last year and went 7-9. Romo isn't the only QB that needs a defense.

Eagle 1
01-02-2014, 12:13 AM
The only stat that matters in the W/L column.
The rest is all hog wash.

Old Tiger
01-02-2014, 12:25 AM
And by the way, the year NO won the SB, they were near the top of the league in takeaways. And they were 4th in points scored.

Brees had the 31 st ranked offense last year and went 7-9. Romo isn't the only QB that needs a defense.

2012 Saints also were missing their head coach.

Macarthur
01-02-2014, 10:19 AM
The only stat that matters in the W/L column.
The rest is all hog wash.

So was Trent dilfer a better QB than Marino ?

Macarthur
01-02-2014, 12:25 PM
As a follow up to the defensive stats, I like football outsiders. I'm sure some of you are familiar with them. They do a defensive stat called DVOA. It's explained here.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/info/methods

Here's the cowboys ranks.

2007 - 9th
2008 - 6th
2009 - 7th
2010 - 20th
2011 - 20th
2012 - 30th
2013 - 32nd

So in the seasons the cowboys have had a good defense, they've been 32-16 When they've had a poor defense, they've been 30-34.

GrTigers6
01-02-2014, 12:26 PM
As a follow up to the defensive stats, I like football outsiders. I'm sure some of you are familiar with them. They do a defensive stat called DVOA. It's explained here.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/info/methods

Here's the cowboys ranks.

2007 - 9th
2008 - 6th
2009 - 7th
2010 - 20th
2011 - 20th
2012 - 30th
2013 - 32nd

So in the seasons the cowboys have had a good defense, they've been 32-16 When they've had a poor defense, they've been 30-34.Just imagine what our record would have been without Romo!

Macarthur
01-02-2014, 01:41 PM
Well, to me, it's not about romo. It really doesn't matter, IMO, if it were romo or cutler or rivers or schaub or stafford. If you don't have the top tier elite QBs, you've got to have a top defense to make a run. And even with a guy like brees, NO defense needed a pretty special year with regards to turnovers for their run.