Conference Cutoff Numbers for 2014-16 - from UIL

[K-MAC Chuck]

Conference Cutoff Numbers for 2014-2016 Reclassification & Realignment


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

AUSTIN— The University Interscholastic League released the conference cutoff numbers for the 2014-2016 reclassification and realignment today. These numbers provide the range of enrollment for each of the six conferences, including the divisional cutoffs for football.



The 2014-16 alignments will be released on Feb. 3 for football and basketball. District alignments for other activities will be released in the order of their seasons. More information about UIL alignments can be found at http://www.uiltexas.org/alignments.



Conference Cutoffs

6A 2100 and above

5A 1060 – 2099

4A 465 – 1059

3A 220 – 464

2A 105 – 219

1A 104.9 and below

1A – 4A Football Division I and Division II Numbers

1A Division I 55 – 104.9

1A Division II 54 and below

2A Division I 158 – 219

2A Division II 105 – 157

3A Division I 315 – 464

3A Division II 220 – 314

4A Division I 686 – 1059

4A Division II 465 – 685

[SHSBulldog00]

Conference Cutoff Numbers for 2014-2016 Reclassification & Realignment


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

AUSTIN— The University Interscholastic League released the conference cutoff numbers for the 2014-2016 reclassification and realignment today. These numbers provide the range of enrollment for each of the six conferences, including the divisional cutoffs for football.



The 2014-16 alignments will be released on Feb. 3 for football and basketball. District alignments for other activities will be released in the order of their seasons. More information about UIL alignments can be found at http://www.uiltexas.org/alignments.



Conference Cutoffs

6A 2100 and above

5A 1060 – 2099

4A 465 – 1059

3A 220 – 464

2A 105 – 219

1A 104.9 and below

1A – 4A Football Division I and Division II Numbers

1A Division I 55 – 104.9

1A Division II 54 and below

2A Division I 158 – 219

2A Division II 105 – 157

3A Division I 315 – 464

3A Division II 220 – 314

4A Division I 686 – 1059

4A Division II 465 – 685

I know Gilmer is happy.

[LHPfactory]

I know Gilmer is happy.

I bet Wimberley is also, They just made 4A-DII with 672. I was hoping to get them in district for a couple more years before we hit 5A.

[87 TIGER]

Looks like Rockdale will stay 3a!

[LHPfactory]

Looks like Rockdale will stay 3a!

The Tigers will probably be contenders for a SC

[Yoe_09]

The Tigers will probably be contenders for a SC

They lose a lot of talent of of this years squad. QB Gibbs, RB Brooks, OL Pelzel (Baylor), LB David (Baylor) are just a few. How did their sub-varsity fair? I believe the 8th grade class probably has the best talent coming up from what I've seen.

[Dogman_1969]

AUSTIN— The University Interscholastic League released the conference cutoff numbers for the 2014-2016 reclassification and realignment today. These numbers provide the range of enrollment for each of the six conferences, including the divisional cutoffs for football.

Conference Cutoffs

6A 2100 and above

5A 1060 – 2099

4A 465 – 1059

3A 220 – 464

2A 105 – 219

1A 104.9 and below

1A – 4A Football Division I and Division II Numbers

1A Division I 55 – 104.9

1A Division II 54 and below

2A Division I 158 – 219

2A Division II 105 – 157

3A Division I 315 – 464

3A Division II 220 – 314

4A Division I 686 – 1059

4A Division II 465 – 685

[Scoop27]

These are no official yet until schools approve them

[1st and goal]

I can't believe how wide a range 5A is. WOW.

[LHPfactory]

I can't believe how wide a range 5A is. WOW.

They should expand 4A up to about 1200 in the 2016-1018 alignment and distribute the additional schools by adjusting the numbers in both divisions of 3A and 4A.

Not for now, I like the looks of the numbers. The next alignment, my oldest will be s senior, don't want to bump classes his last year so 1200 will give LH enough cushion.

[oldtownag]

I know Gilmer is happy.

Maybe now they can be competitive.

[Matthew328]

The schools don't approve the realignment cut lines

[Scoop27]

These are not official until Superintendents approve them

[texas_wildcat]

when will we know when who is in who District

[refereedoc]

February

[jason]

when will we know when who is in who District
You can just look at the list of schools, as long as they are in order by their enrollment, and group them by 6.
As a trial, the UIL isn't doing districts based on their location for this realignment, districts will be solely based on enrollment numbers so that nobody has to play a school that has more than 100 students than they do to keep it all fair.

UIL LINK (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ)

[D'Highlander]

You can just look at the list of schools, as long as they are in order by their enrollment, and group them by 6.
As a trial, the UIL isn't doing districts based on their location for this realignment, districts will be solely based on enrollment numbers so that nobody has to play a school that has more than 100 students than they do to keep it all fair.

UIL LINK (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ)

Thanks for the link Jason. It all makes sense now... :clap:

[Matthew328]

Scoop, The superintendents (ie the schools) have no vote or say in what the UIL cut offs will be for realignment...

[Bug Truck]

Glen Rose stays 3a by 2

[poisoned10]

I know Gilmer is happy.

I know Jasper is sad.


Sent from my iPhone

[Scoop27]

These are not official until approved by superintendents

[Scoop27]

None of the numbers mean anything until the actual team realignments come out in February

[poisoned10]

Matthew318 > Scoop27


Sent from my iPhone

[rb585]

These are not official until approved by superintendents

Wrong again.

[poisoned10]

No matter how many times you say it, it still isn't true.


Sent from my iPhone

[buckeyebob]

Maybe now they can be competitive.

It would be nice...

[87 TIGER]

They lose a lot of talent of of this years squad. QB Gibbs, RB Brooks, OL Pelzel (Baylor), LB David (Baylor) are just a few. How did their sub-varsity fair? I believe the 8th grade class probably has the best talent coming up from what I've seen.
You are correct talent drops off next year, the 8th is loaded .

[ziggy29]

I can't believe how wide a range 5A is. WOW.

In terms of the ratio of smallest to largest enrollment within a classification, 4A (the old 3A) continues to have the widest spread, with the largest schools being up to almost 2.3 times larger than the smallest. I guess there just aren't enough schools scattered around in the right places, but the new 4A and 5A (the old 3A and 4A) probably should be in three classifications, not just two.

[buckeyebob]

I wonder why we have 4A, Div1...Div 2...etc...why do they just not have 1A, 2A,...10A, or Div1, Div 2, Div3...

[toddg]

I wonder why we have 4A, Div1...Div 2...etc...why do they just not have 1A, 2A,...10A, or Div1, Div 2, Div3...
yeah!?

[toddg]

You can just look at the list of schools, as long as they are in order by their enrollment, and group them by 6.
As a trial, the UIL isn't doing districts based on their location for this realignment, districts will be solely based on enrollment numbers so that nobody has to play a school that has more than 100 students than they do to keep it all fair.

UIL LINK (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ)

they do a pretty good job explaining the process they will use...never gonna give, never gonna give up hope that they get it right!!

[Ville-D]

You can just look at the list of schools, as long as they are in order by their enrollment, and group them by 6.
As a trial, the UIL isn't doing districts based on their location for this realignment, districts will be solely based on enrollment numbers so that nobody has to play a school that has more than 100 students than they do to keep it all fair.

UIL LINK (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ)

This link is not official until approved by Scoop

[jason]

This link is not official until approved by Scoop
i forgot about that - don't know what i was thinking

[YTBulldogs]

This link is not official until approved by Scoop

Poor scoop. He'll be the first to know. He once covered the realignment for the Podunk Post in 1950.