PDA

View Full Version : UIL news release Sunday on full contact in football



Scoop27
04-22-2013, 05:34 AM
Uil-committee-recommends-limiting-full-contact-in-football-to-90-minsweek-in-season.ece


From SportsDayHS staff writer Corbett Smith in Austin:

AUSTIN — The days of full-contact drills such as Bull in the Ring and the Oklahoma Drill might be numbered in Texas high school football.

On Sunday, the University Interscholastic League’s Medical Advisory Committee unanimously recommended limiting football programs to 90 minutes of full-contact, game-speed practices per player per week during the regular season and playoffs.

The recommendation, which has to be approved by the UIL Legislative Council in June and signed into effect by the commissioner of education, appears to be in response to House Bill 887, filed by State Rep. Eddie Lucio III, D-Brownsville, that would limit full-contact practices to one per week in an effort to reduce concussion risks.

Since the inception of the Medical Advisory Committee in 2001, every recommendation from the group of doctors, trainers and administrators has been approved.

“It’s been the record of the Medical Advisory Committee since the start to be out front on issues,” UIL athletic director Mark Cousins said, giving as examples requirements for Automated External Defibrillators, concussion protocols, and limiting two-a-day practices to address heat-related concerns. “I think it’s just another example of the fact that they are continually studying these issues to make sure that they are out in front and looking at all the things that are out there to make sure that the game is as safe as it can be.”

The UIL had discussions with Lucio, the bill’s co-sponsor Rep. Greg Bonnen, R-Galveston, and supporter Rep. Scott Turner, R-Rockwall, who played nine seasons in the NFL.

The committee’s recommendation reflects the language that would have been found if the bill was brought to the floor for a vote.

During the debate on the issue, Cousins mentioned that the Ivy League, as well as the NFL with its new collective bargaining agreement, had instituted full-contact restrictions.

Currently, there are limits to the amount of practice time, but nothing that governs how the practice is implemented. Under the language of the recommendation, the new rule would define “full-contact” practices as something done at game speed, with tackling or blocking to the ground.

Texas High School Coaches Association executive director D.W. Rutledge, a member of the committee and former state-title winning football coach, voted for the proposal.

“I think, for the vast majority of the coaches, that fits in their practice schedule without them having to make any adjustments at all,” Rutledge said.

Cedar Hill coach Joey McGuire agreed.

“I think the majority of people, once you hear the full thing, I think they’re pretty much already following that,” McGuire said. “You’re talking about the intent to take somebody to the ground. When we get into district and when we get into the playoffs, we really never have the intent to take anybody to the ground. We’re trying to keep people up.”

The same is true for Class 5A Division I state champion Allen and 4A Division I state champion Denton Guyer. Allen coach Tom Westerberg and Guyer coach John Walsh said their players don’t tackle to the ground during in-season practices.

“I don’t think there are a whole lot of people that are full-contact, live game speed like that much anymore,” Westerberg said.

The committee was careful to place restrictions only on in-season practices. Members John Seals and Albert Hergenroeder, both doctors, expressed reservations for similar restrictions to be placed in spring football or preseason activities. They suggested the majority of teaching and instruction on blocking and tackling techniques would be during those times.

McGuire called the exception “huge.”

“You’ve got to prepare them, and there is a lot of technique work,” McGuire said. “In spring football in a couple of weeks, we’re not game-planning. You’re not sitting there trying to get ready to stop somebody. You’re more working on the fundamentals of football.”

Staff writer Greg Riddle contributed to this report.

---

Corbett Smith has offered additional insight and answered readers' questions on Twitter. Here are some of his tweets:

@corbettsmithDMN: Underlying thread is this: UIL wants to act before the Tex. Legis. does something. Changes better done in-house than by state law #txhsfb

@corbettsmithDMN: The big deal here: there's heat on UIL from legislature on variety of issues, and keeping state house at bay is critical for UIL's future ... For all its faults, UIL serves with interest solely on public education in state. State legislature has motives beyond that.

@ParkerCollins: How long until they make a final decision?
@corbettsmithDMN: June 11 is UIL Legis. Council meeting. No recommendation from the Med. Advisory board has ever failed to pass into rule

@corbettsmithDMN: D.W. Rutledge, exec. dir. of THSCA, voted yes. Said majority of programs in the state already comply with 90-min. rule in-season. #txhsfb
(Cedar Hill football coach Joey McGuire) @Coach_McGuire50: @corbettsmithDMN I trust Coach Rutledge. If he has heard what they call full contact and is good with it so am I.

@sloan_coach: @corbettsmithDMN limiting "full-contact" practices will cause more damage in the long run. Repetition of proper technique is a better choice
@corbettsmithDMN: @sloan_coach That's why rule would apply in-season. Board recognizes need for proper instruction on technique in pre-season/spring.

Old Tiger
04-22-2013, 06:02 AM
This is only going to cause more injuries due to players bodies not being conditioned for contact. For 4a/5a this makes a little sense but in 3a and under where spring practice isn't full pads it doesn't make much sense at all. The only time you can practice technique for smaller schools is during the fall.

Matthew328
04-22-2013, 08:24 AM
This is only going to cause more injuries due to players bodies not being conditioned for contact. For 4a/5a this makes a little sense but in 3a and under where spring practice isn't full pads it doesn't make much sense at all. The only time you can practice technique for smaller schools is during the fall.

3A and under will still get their time during 2-a days....this isn't a perfect ruling but its light years ahead of where Lucio's bill if passed would be...

A lot of schools rarely do 90 minutes of full contact, full pads game speed, tackling to the ground in practice anyway..this will not affect most

cougartino
04-22-2013, 11:01 AM
Friday Night Flag League!

YTBulldogs
04-22-2013, 11:43 AM
Who you think will regulate the contact time during practices?:doh:

NastySlot
04-22-2013, 01:17 PM
Who you think will regulate the contact time during practices?:doh:

I'm sure there will be some parent keeping track So they can someday use it a against the coach and his staff.

YTBulldogs
04-22-2013, 01:21 PM
I'm sure there will be some parent keeping track So they can someday use it a against the coach and his staff.

Might. This can never be regulated. Think the coaches will adhere to it?

jason
04-22-2013, 01:25 PM
Would it be a designated 90 minute slot for full contact or any combination of 90 minutes worth of live plays w/ full contact? If it's any combination then it seems 90 minutes is plenty of time. Assume a single play takes approximately 10 seconds to run at full speed then that's approx 540 full contact plays a team can run each week during practice.

Unless you have to count the time between plays, 90 minutes should be fine.

cougartino
04-22-2013, 02:55 PM
Who you think will regulate the contact time during practices?:doh:

Pay me a decent salary, provide me with a car and lodging, and I'll drive around the state and keep notes.

Matthew328
04-22-2013, 02:56 PM
Generally speaking coaches regulate themselves...there's limits on how long a team can practice, when teams can have pads etc also...who do you think regulates that?

YTBulldogs
04-22-2013, 03:22 PM
My point exactly Matt. Some don't follow those rules you mentioned now. So, this new rule is meaningless, cause some will not adhere to it. But, it does give the UIL some protection if an injury happens. They set the time rule for contact, and the coach failed to follow it.

Matthew328
04-22-2013, 03:43 PM
Pretty much this is a way to say hey we put the rules in place in case of litigation..